When there is a debonding at the bone-implant interface, the difference in stiffness between the implant and the bone can result in micromotion, allowing existing gaps to open further or new gaps to be created during physiological loading. It has been suggested that periprosthetic fluid flow and high pressure may play an important role in osteolysis development in the proximity of these gaps. To explain this phenomenon, the concepts of “effective joint space” and “pumping stem” have been cited in many studies. However, there is no clear understanding of the factors causing, or contributing to, these mechanisms. It is likely that capsular pressure, gap dimensions, and micromotion of the gap during cyclic loading of an implant can play a defining role in inducing periprosthetic flow. In order to obtain a better understanding of the main influences on periprosthetic flows and the development of osteolysis, steady state and transient 2D computational fluid dynamic simulations were performed for the joint capsule of the lateral side of a stem-femur system, and a gap in communication with the capsule and the surrounding bone. It was shown that high capsular pressure may be the main driving force for high fluid pressure and flow in the bone surrounding the gap, while micromotion of only very long and narrow gaps can cause significant pressure and flow in the bone. At low capsular pressure, micromotion induced large flows in the gap region; however, the flow in the bone tissue was almost unaffected. The results also revealed the existence of high velocity spikes in the bone region at the bottom of the gap. These velocity spikes can exert excessive fluid shear stress on the bone cells and disturb the local biological balance of the surrounding interstitial fluid which can result in osteolysis development. High capsular pressure was observed to be the main cause of these velocity spikes whereas, at low capsular pressure, gap micromotion of only very long and narrow gaps generated significant velocity spikes in the bone at the bottom of the gaps.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: N.W.Bressloff@soton.ac.uk
Article navigation
December 2011
Research Papers
Do Capsular Pressure and Implant Motion Interact to Cause High Pressure in the Periprosthetic Bone in Total Hip Replacement?
Hamidreza Alidousti,
Hamidreza Alidousti
School of Engineering Sciences,
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, UK
, SO17 1BJ
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Taylor,
Mark Taylor
School of Engineering Sciences,
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, UK
, SO17 1BJ
Search for other works by this author on:
Neil W. Bressloff
Neil W. Bressloff
School of Engineering Sciences,
e-mail: N.W.Bressloff@soton.ac.uk
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, UK
, SO17 1BJ
Search for other works by this author on:
Hamidreza Alidousti
School of Engineering Sciences,
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, UK
, SO17 1BJ
Mark Taylor
School of Engineering Sciences,
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, UK
, SO17 1BJ
Neil W. Bressloff
School of Engineering Sciences,
University of Southampton
, Highfield, Southampton, UK
, SO17 1BJe-mail: N.W.Bressloff@soton.ac.uk
J Biomech Eng. Dec 2011, 133(12): 121001 (10 pages)
Published Online: December 21, 2011
Article history
Received:
May 17, 2011
Revised:
November 10, 2011
Online:
December 21, 2011
Published:
December 21, 2011
Citation
Alidousti, H., Taylor, M., and Bressloff, N. W. (December 21, 2011). "Do Capsular Pressure and Implant Motion Interact to Cause High Pressure in the Periprosthetic Bone in Total Hip Replacement?." ASME. J Biomech Eng. December 2011; 133(12): 121001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005455
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Simultaneous Prediction of Multiple Unmeasured Muscle Activations Through Synergy Extrapolation
J Biomech Eng (March 2025)
Quantification of Internal Disc Strain Under Dynamic Loading Via High-Frequency Ultrasound
J Biomech Eng (March 2025)
Related Articles
Design of an Endoreactor for the Cultivation of a Joint-Like-Structure
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Substrate Deformation Levels Associated With Routine Physical Activity Are Less Stimulatory to Bone Cells Relative to Loading-Induced Oscillatory Fluid Flow
J Biomech Eng (August,2000)
Bone Resorption Induced by Fluid Flow
J Biomech Eng (September,2009)
Micromechanically Based Poroelastic Modeling of Fluid Flow in Haversian Bone
J Biomech Eng (February,2003)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Chapter 15 | Regenerative Engineering: Fulfilling the Tissue Engineering Promise to Bone Regeneration
Bone Graft Substitutes and Bone Regenerative Engineering
List of Commercial Codes
Introduction to Finite Element, Boundary Element, and Meshless Methods: With Applications to Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow
Comparative Study of Bone Cell Culture Methods for Tissue Engineering Applications
Tissue Engineered Medical Products (TEMPs)