0
Research Papers: Design Automation

Design Exploration of Reliably Manufacturable Materials and Structures With Applications to Negative Stiffness Metamaterials and Microstereolithography1

[+] Author and Article Information
Clinton Morris, Carolyn C. Seepersad

Mechanical Engineering Department,
The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712

Logan Bekker

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Livermore, CA 94550

Michael R. Haberman

Mechanical Engineering Department
and Applied Research Laboratories,
The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received April 2, 2018; final manuscript received August 7, 2018; published online September 12, 2018. Assoc. Editor: James K. Guest.

J. Mech. Des 140(11), 111415 (Sep 12, 2018) (14 pages) Paper No: MD-18-1286; doi: 10.1115/1.4041251 History: Received April 02, 2018; Revised August 07, 2018

One of the challenges in designing metamaterials for additive manufacturing (AM) is accounting for the differences between as-designed and as-built geometries and material properties. From a designer's perspective, these differences can lead to degradation of part and metamaterial performance, which is especially difficult to accommodate in small-lot or one-of-a-kind production. In this context, each part is unique, and therefore, extensive iteration is costly. Designers need a means of exploring the design space while simultaneously considering the reliability of additively manufacturing particular candidate designs. In this work, a design exploration approach, based on Bayesian network classifiers (BNC), is extended to incorporate manufacturing variation into the design exploration process and identify designs that reliably meet performance requirements when this variation is taken into account. The example application is the design of negative stiffness (NS) metamaterials, in which small volume fractions of NS inclusions are embedded within a host material. The resulting metamaterial or composite exhibits macroscopic mechanical stiffness and loss properties that exceed those of the base matrix material. The inclusions are fabricated with microstereolithography with features on the scale of tens of microns, but variability is observed in material properties and dimensions from specimen to specimen. This variability is measured and modeled via design, fabrication, and characterization of metrology parts. The quantified manufacturing variability is incorporated into the BNC approach as a manufacturability classifier to identify candidate designs that achieve performance targets reliably, even when manufacturing variability is taken into account.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gibson, I. , Rosen, D. W. , and Stucker, B. , 2010, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer, Boston, MA.
Salzbrenner, B. C. , Rodelas, J. M. , Madison, J. D. , Jared, B. H. , Swiler, L. P. , Shen, Y. L. , and Boyce, B. L. , 2017, “ High-Throughput Stochastic Tensile Performance of Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 241, pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Bourell, D. L. , Watt, T. J. , Leigh, D. K. , and Fulcher, B. , 2014, “ Performance Limitation in Polymer Laser Sintering,” Phys. Procedia, 56, pp. 147–156. [CrossRef]
Allison, J. , Sharpe, C. , and Seepersad, C. C. , 2017, “ A Test Part for Evaluating the Accuracy and Resolution of a Polymer Powder Bed Fusion Process,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 139(10), p. 100902.
Everton, S. K. , Hirsch, M. , Stravroulakis, P. , Leach, R. K. , and Clare, A. T. , 2016, “ Review of In-Situ Process Monitoring and In-Situ Metrology for Metal Additive Manufacturing,” Mater. Des., 95, pp. 431–445. [CrossRef]
Castillo, L. , 2005, Study About the Rapid Manufacturing of Complex Parts of Stainless Steel and Titanium, TNO Industrial Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Mahesh, M. , Wong, Y. , Fuh, J. Y. H. , and Loh, H. T. , 2004, “ Benchmarking for Comparative Evaluation of RP Systems and Processes,” Rapid Prototyp. J., 10(2), pp. 123–135. [CrossRef]
Govett, T. , Kim, K. , Pinero, D. , and Lundin, M. , 2012, Design Rules for Selective Laser Sintering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Moylan, S. , Slotwinski, J. , Cooke, A. , Jurrens, K. , and Donmez, M. A. , 2014, “ An Additive Manufacturing Test Artifact,” J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 119, pp. 429–459. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sigmund, O. , 2009, “ Manufacturing Tolerant Topology Optimization,” Acta Mech. Sin., 25(2), pp. 227–239. [CrossRef]
Chen, S. , Chen, W. , and Lee, S. , 2010, “ Level Set Based Robust Shape and Topology Optimization Under Random Field Uncertainties,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 41(4), pp. 507–524. [CrossRef]
Schevenels, M. , Lazarov, B. S. , and Sigmund, O. , 2011, “ Robust Topology Optimization Accounting for Spatially Varying Manufacturing Errors,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 200(49–52), pp. 3613–3627. [CrossRef]
Thompson, M. K. , Moroni, G. , Vaneker, T. , Fadel, G. , Campbell, R. I. , Gibson, I. , Bernard, A. , Schulz, J. , Graf, P. , Ahuja, B. , and Martina, F. , 2016, “ Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends Opportunities, Considerations, and Constraints,” CIRP Annals, 65(2), pp. 737–760. [CrossRef]
Yang, S. , and Zhao, Y. F. , 2015, “ Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Design Theory and Methodology: A Critical Review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 80(1–4), pp. 327–342. [CrossRef]
McDowell, D. L. , Panchal, J. , Choi, H. J. , Seepersad, C. , Allen, J. , and Mistree, F. , 2009, Integrated Design of Multiscale, Multifunctional Materials and Products, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA.
Olson, G. B. , 1997, “ Computational Design of Hierarchically Structured Materials,” Science, 277(5330), pp. 1237–1242. [CrossRef]
Matthews, J. , Klatt, T. , Morris, C. , Seepersad, C. C. , Haberman, M. R. , and Shahan, D. W. , 2016, “ Hierarchical Design of Negative Stiffness Metamaterials Using a Bayesian Network Classifier,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 138(4), p. 041404.
Klatt, T. , and Haberman, M. R. , 2013, “ A Nonlinear Negative Stiffness Metamaterial Unit Cell and Small-On-Large Multiscale Material Model,” J. Appl. Phys., 114(3), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Cortes, S. , Allison, J. , Morris, C. , Haberman, M. R. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Kovar, D. , 2017, “ Design, Manufacture, and Quai-Static Testing of Metallic Negative Stiffness Structures Within a Polymer Matrix,” Exp. Mech., 57(8), pp. 1183–1191. [CrossRef]
Shahan, D. W. , and Seepersad, C. C. , 2012, “ Bayesian Network Classifiers for Set-Based Collaborative Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(7), p. 071001.
Ward, A. , Liker, J. K. , Cristiano, J. J. , and Sobek, D. K. , 1995, “ The Second Toyota Paradox,” Sloan Manage. Rev., 36(3), pp. 43–61. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-second-toyota-paradox-how-delaying-decisions-can-make-better-cars-faster/
Sobek, D. K. , Ward, A. C. , and Liker, J. K. , 1999, “ Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering,” Sloan Manage. Rev., 40(2), pp. 67–84. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/toyotas-principles-of-setbased-concurrent-engineering/
Chang, T. S. , Ward, A. C. , Lee, J. , and Jacox, E. H. , 1994, “ Conceptual Robustness in Simultaneous Engineering: An Extension of Taguchi's Parameter Design,” Res. Eng. Des., 6(4), pp. 211–222. [CrossRef]
Chen, W. , 1999, “ A Robust Design Approach for Achieving Flexibility in Multidisciplinary Design,” AIAA J., 37(8), pp. 982–989. [CrossRef]
Kalsi, M. , Hacker, K. , and Lewis, K. , 1999, “ A Comprehensive Robust Design Approach for Decision Trade-Offs in Complex System Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 123(1), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Hu, Q. , Yu, D. , Liu, J. , and Wu, C. , 2008, “ Neighborhood Rough Set Based Heterogeneous Feature Subset Selection,” Inf. Sci., 178(18), pp. 3577–3594. [CrossRef]
Panchal, J. H. , Fernández, M. G. , Christiaan, J. J. , Paredis, J. K. , and Mistree, F. , 2007, “ An Interval-Based Constraint Satisfaction (IBCS) Method for Decentralized Collaborative Multifunctional Design,” Concurrent Eng., 15(3), pp. 309–323. [CrossRef]
Hartl, D. J. , Galvan, E. , Malak, R. J. , and Baur, J. W. , 2016, “ Parameterized Design Optimization of a Magnetohydrodynamic Liquid Metal Active Cooling Concept,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 138(3), p. 031402. [CrossRef]
Zeliff, K. , Bennette, W. , and Ferguson, S. , 2017, “ Benchmarking the Performance of a Machine Learning Classifier Enabled Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm on Six Standard Test Functions,” ASME Paper No. DETC2017-68332.
Chen, W. , and Fuge, M. , 2017, “ Beyond the Known: Detecting Novel Feasible Domains Over an Unbounded Design Space,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 139(11), p. 111405. [CrossRef]
Rosen, D. W. , 2015, “ A Set-Based Design Method for Material-Geometry Structures by Design Space Mapping,” ASME Paper No. DETC2015-46760.
Matthews, J. , Klatt, T. , Seepersad, C. C. , Haberman, M. R. , and Shahan, D. W. , 2013, “ Hierarchical Design of Composite Materials With Negative Stiffness Inclusions Using a Bayesian Network Classifier,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-13128.
Scott, D. W. , 1992, Multivariate Density Estimates, Wiley, New York.
Perez, A. , Larranaga, P. , and Inza, I. , 2009, “ Bayesian Classifiers Based on Kernel Density Estimation: Flexible Classifiers,” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 50(2), pp. 341–362. [CrossRef]
Friedman, N. , Geiger, D. , and Goldzsmidt, M. , 1997, “ Bayesian Network Classifiers,” Mach. Learn., 29(2/3), pp. 131–163. [CrossRef]
Hoffmann, R. , and Tresp, V. , 1995, “ Discovering Structure in Continuous Variable Using Bayesian Networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
John, G. , and Langley, P. , 1995, “ Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers,” 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QC, Canada Aug. 18–20. http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~honavar/bayes-continuous.pdf
Bosman, P. , and Thierens, D. , 2000, “ IDEAs Based on the Normal Kernels Probability Density Function,” Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Soong, T. T. , 2004, Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Haberman, M. R. , Berthelot, Y. H. , and Cherkaoui, M. , 2006, “ Micromechanical Modeling of Particulate Composite for Damping of Acoustic Waves,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 128(3), pp. 320–329. [CrossRef]
Koutsawa, Y. , Haberman, M. R. , and Cherkaoui, M. , 2009, “ Multiscale Design of a Rectangular Sandwich Plate With Viscoelastic Materials,” Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des., 5(1), pp. 29–44. [CrossRef]
Wojnar, C. S. , and Kochmann, D. M. , 2013, “ A Negative-Stiffness Phase in Elastic Composites Can Produce Stable Extreme Effective Dynamic but Not Static Stiffness,” Philos. Mag., 94(6), pp. 532–555. [CrossRef]
Huh, D. S. , and Cooper, S. L. , 1971, ¸“ Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane Block Polymers,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 77(5), pp. 369–376. [CrossRef]
Qiu, J. , Lang, J. H. , and Slocum, A. H. , 2004, “ A Curved-Beam Bistable Mechanism,” J. Microeletromechanical Syst., 13(2), pp. 137–146. [CrossRef]
Lakes, R. S. , 2001, “ Extreme Damping in Composite Materials With a Negative Stiffness Phase,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(13), pp. 2897–2900. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Morris, C. , Cormack, J. M. , Hamilton, M. F. , Haberman, M. R. , and Seepersad, C. C. , 2017, “ Ultrasonic Characterization of the Complex Young's Modulus of Polymer Parts Produced With Microstereolithography,” Rapid Prototyping J., (in press).
Young, W. C. , Budynas, R. G. , and Sadegh, A. M. , 2011, Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Massey, F. J. , 1951, “ The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 46(253), pp. 68–78. [CrossRef]
Mani, M. , Feng, S. , Lane, B. , Donmez, A. , Moylan, S. , and Fesperman, R. , 2015, “ Measurement Science Needs for Real-Time Control of Additive Manufacturing Powder Bed Fusion Processes,” US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Kernel density estimate from random distribution of bivariate data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparing the posterior class probabilities identifies regions of satisfactory or unsatisfactory design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Classified satisfactory and unsatisfactory training data generate posterior class probabilities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of the BNC approach partitioning design spaces into regions of satisfactory and unsatisfactory design for a multilevel design problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flowchart illustrating the workflow of incorporating manufacturing variability in the BNC approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flowchart describing classification scheme for incorporating manufacturing variation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Illustration of the geometric interpretation of the relationship between the manufacturing variation and BNC satisfactory region. The manufacturing variation distribution is formed via Monte Carlo sampling from the multivariate manufacturing distribution centered on the candidate point. If the hyper volume of the manufacturing distribution bounded by the BNC decision boundary is greater than a manufacturability threshold specified by the designer, the candidate point is considered reliably manufacturable.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Proposed geometry for a NS inclusion (top right) with associated force–displacement curve for a loaded beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Schematic illustrating the multilevel nature of the design of negative stiffness metamaterials (top). Flowchart illustrating the connectivity of the design and performance spaces (bottom).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Classification of the macroscale performance space (top) propagated to the microscale design space (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Plot illustrating that sufficient samples have been obtained for thickness and apex height measurements to converge to a stable thickness variation distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Decision boundary of the microscale design space formed by the BNC approach (top) and 2D projection of design space to highlight the shape of the classification boundary (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Decision boundary of the microscale design space (left) with two unsatisfactory designs highlighted and a projection of the satisfactory designs and two selected unsatisfactory designs into the mesoscale performance space (right), indicating that the satisfactory designs exhibit a linear relationship between C11Inc and C12Inc that is not provided by the unsatisfactory designs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Scanning electron microscope images of a NS inclusion (bottom) in which a cubic spline is fit to the boundary of a NS beam. Arrows indicate the normal direction used to measure beam thickness (top).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Illustration of a cubic spline fit to the boundary of a NS beam that can be used to determine the apex height of the beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Negative stiffness inclusion geometry parameterized by design variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Kernel density estimates generated from beam thickness measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Mappings of the satisfactory decision boundaries for the microscale design space

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Mappings of the reliably manufacturable decision boundaries illustrating the impact of varying the reliability threshold

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Mappings of the performance space predicting satisfactory and attainable performance for the highlighted performance requirement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Visual workflow illustrating the complete incorporation of manufacturing variation into the BNC approach for a NS metamaterials design problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Kernel density estimates generated from beam thickness measurements of new design (left) compared to original distribution (right)

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In