Technical Brief

A Model for the Design of a Pomelo Peel Bioinspired Foam

[+] Author and Article Information
Jonel Ortiz

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station 77840, TX
e-mail: jaortiz16@tamu.edu

Guanglu Zhang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station 77840, TX
e-mail: glzhang@tamu.edu

Daniel A. McAdams

ASME Fellow
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station 77840, TX
e-mail: dmcadams@tamu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 28, 2018; final manuscript received July 11, 2018; published online September 7, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Yan Wang.

J. Mech. Des 140(11), 114501 (Sep 07, 2018) (5 pages) Paper No: MD-18-1160; doi: 10.1115/1.4040911 History: Received February 28, 2018; Revised July 11, 2018

The structure of pomelo peel arouses research interest in recent years because of the outstanding damping and energy dissipating performance of the pomelo peel. Researchers found that pomelo peel has varying pore size through the peel thickness; the pore size gradient is one of the key reasons leading to superior energy dissipation performance of pomelo peel. In this paper, we introduce a method to model pomelo peel bioinspired foams with nonuniform pore distribution. We generate the skeletal open cell structure of the bioinspired foams using Voronoi tessellation. The skeleton of the bioinspired foams is built as three-dimension (3D) beam elements in a full-scale finite element model. The quasi-static and dynamic mechanical behaviors of the pomelo peel bioinspired foams could be derived through a finite element analysis (FEA). We illustrate our method using a case study of pomelo peel bioinspired aluminum foams under quasi-static compression and free fall impact circumstances. The case study results validate our method and demonstrate the superior impact resistance and damping behavior of bioinspired foam with gradient porosity for designers.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Fischer, S. F. , Thielen, M. , Loprang, R. R. , Seidel, R. , Fleck, C. , Speck, T. , and Bührig-Polaczek, A. , 2010, “Pummelos as Concept Generators for Biomimetically Inspired Low Weight Structures With Excellent Damping Properties,” Adv. Eng. Mater., 12(12), pp. B658–B663. [CrossRef]
Thielen, M. , Schmitt, C. N. Z. , Eckert, S. , Speck, T. , and Seidel, R. , 2013, “Structure–Function Relationship of the Foam-Like Pomelo Peel (Citrus Maxima)—An Inspiration for the Development of Biomimetic Damping Materials With High Energy Dissipation,” Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 8(2), p. 025001. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Thielen, M. , Speck, T. , and Seidel, R. , 2013, “Viscoelasticity and Compaction Behaviour of the Foam-Like Pomelo (Citrus Maxima) Peel,” J. Mater. Sci., 48(9), pp. 3469–3478. [CrossRef]
Seidel, R. , Bührig-Polaczek, A. , Fleck, C. , and Speck, T. , 2009, “Impact Resistance of Hierarchically Structured Fruit Walls and Nut Shells in View of Biomimetic Applications,” Sixth Plant Biomechanics Conference, Cayenne, French Guyana, Nov. 16–21, pp. 406–411.
Thielen, M. , Schüler, P. , and Fischer, S. F. , 2013, “Biomimetic Engineering: Learning From Nature,” GIT Lab. J., (epub). https://www.laboratory-journal.com/science/material-science/biomimetic-engineering-learning-nature
Fischer, S. F. , Thielen, M. , Weiß, P. , Seidel, R. , Speck, T. , Bührig-Polaczek, A. , and Bünck, M. , 2014, “Production and Properties of a Precision-Cast Bio-Inspired Composite,” J. Mater. Sci., 49(1), pp. 43–51. [CrossRef]
Ashby, M. F. , and Medalist, R. F. M. , 1983, “The Mechanical Properties of Cellular Solids,” Metall. Trans. A, 14(9), pp. 1755–1769. [CrossRef]
Gong, L. , and Kyriakides, S. , 2005, “Compressive Response of Open Cell Foams—Part II: Initiation and Evolution of Crushing,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(5–6), pp. 1381–1399. [CrossRef]
Gong, L. , Kyriakides, S. , and Jang, W. Y. , 2005, “Compressive Response of Open-Cell Foams—Part I: Morphology and Elastic Properties,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(5–6), pp. 1355–1379. [CrossRef]
Gaitanaros, S. , Kyriakides, S. , and Kraynik, A. M. , 2012, “On the Crushing Response of Random Open-Cell Foams,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 49(19–20), pp. 2733–2743. [CrossRef]
Okabe, A. , 2000, Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams, Wiley, New York.
Rycroft, C. H. , 2018, “Voro++,” University of California, Berkeley, CA, epub, accessed July 24, 2018, http://math.lbl.gov/voro++/
Litewka, P. , 2010, Finite Element Analysis of Beam-to-Beam Contact, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Olovsson, L. , Simonsson, K. , and Unosson, M. , 2005, “Selective Mass Scaling for Explicit Finite Element Analyses,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 63(10), pp. 1436–1445. [CrossRef]
Prior, A. M. , 1994, “Applications of Implicit and Explicit Finite Element Techniques to Metal Forming,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 45(1–4), pp. 649–656. [CrossRef]
Cocchetti, G. , Pagani, M. , and Perego, U. , 2013, “Selective Mass Scaling and Critical Time-Step Estimate for Explicit Dynamics Analyses With Solid-Shell Elements,” Comput. Struct., 127, pp. 39–52. [CrossRef]
ASM, 2002, Atlas of Stress-Strain Curves, ASM International, Russell Township, OH.
Fan, S. , Zhang, T. , Yu, K. , Fang, H. , Xiong, H. , Dai, Y. , Ma, J. , Jiang, D. , and Zhu, H. , 2017, “Compressive Properties and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Open-Cell Nickel Foams,” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 27(1), pp. 117–124. [CrossRef]
Fischer, S. F. , 2016, “Energy Absorption Efficiency of Open-Cell Pure Aluminum Foams,” Mater. Lett., 184, pp. 208–210. [CrossRef]
Yu, S. , Liu, J. , Wei, M. , Luo, Y. , Zhu, X. , and Liu, Y. , 2009, “Compressive Property and Energy Absorption Characteristic of Open-Cell ZA22 Foams,” Mater. Des., 30(1), pp. 87–90. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Composition of pomelo peel (Reproduced with permission from Thielen et al. [5]. Copyright 2013 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Stress contour of specimen with gradient porosity under free fall impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The internal, kinetic, and plastic dissipation energies of specimen with gradient porosity under free fall impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison in cross section of a uniform porosity specimen (left) and specimen with gradient porosity (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stress contour of specimen with uniform porosity under quasi-static compression

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Stress–strain curve of specimen with uniform and gradient porosity under quasi-static compression



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In