Research Papers: Design of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems

A Versatile 3R Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Initially Curved and Straight Compliant Beams of Uniform Cross section

[+] Author and Article Information
Venkatasubramanian Kalpathy Venkiteswaran

Department of Biomechanical Engineering,
University of Twente,
Drienerlolaan 5,
Enschede 7522 NB, The Netherlands
e-mail: v.kalpathyvenkiteswaran@utwente.nl

Hai-Jun Su

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH 43210
e-mail: su.298@osu.edu

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 8, 2018; final manuscript received June 9, 2018; published online July 9, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Dar-Zen Chen.

J. Mech. Des 140(9), 092305 (Jul 09, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: MD-18-1111; doi: 10.1115/1.4040628 History: Received February 08, 2018; Revised June 09, 2018

Rigid-body discretization of continuum elements was developed as a method for simplifying the kinematics of otherwise complex systems. Recent work on pseudo-rigid-body (PRB) models for compliant mechanisms has opened up the possibility of using similar concepts for synthesis and design, while incorporating various types of flexible elements within the same framework. In this paper, an idea for combining initially curved and straight beams within planar compliant mechanisms is developed to create a set of equations that can be used to analyze various designs and topologies. A PRB model with three revolute joints is derived to approximate the behavior of initially curved compliant beams, while treating straight beams as a special case (zero curvature). The optimized model parameter values are tabled for a range of arc angles. The general kinematic and static equations for a single-loop mechanism are shown, with an example to illustrate accuracy for shape and displacement . Finally, this framework is used for the design of a compliant constant force mechanism to illustrate its application, and comparisons with finite element analysis (FEA) are provided for validation.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Howell, L. L. , 2001, Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York.
Howell, L. L. , Magleby, S. P. , and Olsen, B. M. , 2013, Handbook of Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York. [CrossRef]
Hopkins, J. B. , and Culpepper, M. L. , 2010, “ Synthesis of Multi-Degree of Freedom, Parallel Flexure System Concepts Via Freedom and Constraint Topology (FACT)—Part II: Practice,” Precis. Eng., 34(2), pp. 271–278. [CrossRef]
Hopkins, J. B. , and Culpepper, M. L. , 2010, “ Synthesis of Multi-Degree of Freedom, Parallel Flexure System Concepts Via Freedom and Constraint Topology (FACT)—Part I: Principles,” Precis. Eng., 34(2), pp. 259–270. [CrossRef]
Kim, C. J. , Moon, Y.-M. , and Kota, S. , 2008, “ A Building Block Approach to the Conceptual Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Utilizing Compliance and Stiffness Ellipsoids,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 130(2), p. 022308. [CrossRef]
Su, H.-J. , Dorozhkin, D. , and Vance, J. , 2009, “ A Screw Theory Approach for the Conceptual Design of Flexible Joints for Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 1(4), p. 041009. [CrossRef]
Su, H.-J. , 2011, “ Mobility Analysis of Flexure Mechanisms Via Screw Algebra,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 3(4), p. 041010. [CrossRef]
Awtar, S. , Slocum, A. H. , and Sevincer, E. , 2006, “ Characteristics of Beam-Based Flexure Modules,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(6), pp. 625–639. [CrossRef]
Ma, F. , and Chen, G. , 2015, “ Modeling Large Planar Deflections of Flexible Beams in Compliant Mechanisms Using Chained Beam-Constraint-Model,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(2), p. 021018. [CrossRef]
Frecker, M. I. , Ananthasuresh, G. K. , Nishiwaki, S. , Kikuchi, N. , and Kota, S. , 1997, “ Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Multi-Criteria Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119(2), pp. 238–245. [CrossRef]
Kota, S. , Joo, J. , Li, Z. , Rodgers, S. M. , and Sniegowski, J. , 2001, “ Design of Compliant Mechanisms: Applications to MEMS,” Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process., 29(1/2), pp. 7–15. [CrossRef]
Howell, L. L. , and Midha, A. , 1994, “ A Method for the Design of Compliant Mechanisms With Small-Length Flexural Pivots,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116(1), pp. 280–290. [CrossRef]
Dado, M. H. , 2001, “ Variable Parametric Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Large-Deflection Beams With End Loads,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 36(7), pp. 1123–1133. [CrossRef]
Saxena, A. , and Kramer, S. N. , 1998, “ A Simple and Accurate Method for Determining Large Deflections in Compliant Mechanisms Subjected to End Forces and Moments,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120(3), pp. 392–400. [CrossRef]
Kimball, C. , and Tsai, L.-W. , 2002, “ Modeling of Flexural Beams Subjected to Arbitrary End Loads,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(2), pp. 223–235. [CrossRef]
Edwards, B. T. , Jensen, B. D. , and Howell, L. L. , 1999, “ A Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Initially-Curved Pinned-Pinned Segments Used in Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 123(3), pp. 464–468. [CrossRef]
Venkiteswaran, V. K. , and Su, H.-J. , 2016, “ Pseudo-Rigid-Body Models for Circular Beams Under Combined Tip Loads,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 106, pp. 80–93. [CrossRef]
Pei, X. , Yu, J. , Zong, G. , and Bi, S. , 2010, “ An Effective Pseudo-Rigid-Body Method for Beam-Based Compliant Mechanisms,” Precis. Eng., 34(3), pp. 634–639. [CrossRef]
Su, H.-J. , 2009, “ A Pseudorigid-Body 3r Model for Determining Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams Subject to Tip Loads,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 1(2), p. 021008. [CrossRef]
Yu, Y.-Q. , Feng, Z.-L. , and Xu, Q.-P. , 2012, “ A Pseudo-Rigid-Body 2r Model of Flexural Beam in Compliant Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 55, pp. 18–33. [CrossRef]
Venkiteswaran, V. K. , and Su, H.-J. , 2016, “ A Three-Spring Pseudorigid-Body Model for Soft Joints With Significant Elongation Effects,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 8(6), p. 061001. [CrossRef]
Venkiteswaran, V. K. , and Su, H.-J. , 2016, “ Extension Effects in Compliant Joints and Pseudo-Rigid-Body Models,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 138(9), p. 092302. [CrossRef]
Venkiteswaran, V. K. , Turkkan, O. A. , and Su, H.-J. , 2017, “ Speeding Up Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms With Pseudo-Rigid-Body Models,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 9(4), p. 041007. [CrossRef]
Lu, K.-J. , and Kota, S. , 2005, “ An Effective Method of Synthesizing Compliant Adaptive Structures Using Load Path Representation,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 16(4), pp. 307–317. [CrossRef]
Roach, G. M. , and Howell, L. L. , 2002, “ Evaluation and Comparison of Alternative Compliant Overrunning Clutch Designs,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(3), pp. 485–491. [CrossRef]
Qiu, J. , Lang, J. , and Slocum, A. , 2004, “ A Curved-Beam Bistable Mechanism,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 13(2), pp. 137–146. [CrossRef]
Wang, N. , Liang, X. , and Zhang, X. , 2014, “ Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model for Corrugated Cantilever Beam Used in Compliant Mechanisms,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 27(1), pp. 122–129. [CrossRef]
Midha, A. , Kuber, R. S. , and Bapat, S. G. , 2015, “ Development of a Methodology for Pseudo-Rigid-Body Models of Compliant Beams With Inserts, and Experimental Validation,” ASME. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Volume 5A: 39th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference), Boston, MA, Aug 2–5.
Venkiteswaran, V. K. , and Su, H.-J. , 2015, “ A Parameter Optimization Framework for Determining the Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model of Cantilever-Beams,” Precis. Eng., 40, pp. 46–54. [CrossRef]
Craig, J. J. , 2005, Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, Pearson Education, Incorporated, London. [PubMed] [PubMed]
Turkkan, O. A. , and Su, H.-J. , 2016, “ DAS-2d: A Concept Design Tool for Compliant Mechanisms,” Mech. Sci., 7(2), pp. 135–148. [CrossRef]
Boyle, C. , Howell, L. L. , Magleby, S. P. , and Evans, M. S. , 2003, “ Dynamic Modeling of Compliant Constant-Force Compression Mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 38(12), pp. 1469–1487. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y.-H. , and Lan, C.-C. , 2012, “ An Adjustable Constant-Force Mechanism for Adaptive End-Effector Operations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(3), p. 031005. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A straight beam can act as a line constraint between two points (assuming no buckling), whereas a curved beam has behavior similar to a stiff prismatic joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Initially curved beam subject to tip loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Symmetric 3R PRB model for initially curved beams before and after deformation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Plots showing the variation of the optimal PRB parameters as a function of the arc angle, ψ in radians. The result at ψ = 0 represents a straight beam. The optimization was performed at 15 deg intervals. The curves are polynomial fitting functions presented at the end of Sec. 2.3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic of a single-loop compliant mechanism with multiple beams subjected to a load of force F and moment M (above) and one beam shown separately for defining variables (below)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Shape of a three beam compliant mechanism with two curved and one straight beam calculated using FEA and the PRB model described in this paper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of displacement of P2 from Fig. 6 under the action of load F

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of one half of a symmetric compliant mechanism. Each half has three beams, which may be curved or straight. The thick black dotted lines represent one possible topology with two curved beams and one straight beam.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The optimized version of the constant-force mechanism analyzed using FEA. The undeformed mechanism is shown in white, and the stress variation is illustrated in the deformed mechanism.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of results from FEA and PRB analysis. The plot at the top shows the change in strain energy versus the displacement and the one at the bottom is the plot for force.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In