Research Papers: Design of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems

Effect of Ramp Angle on the Anti-Loosening Ability of Wedge Self-Locking Nuts Under Vibration

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianhua Liu

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District,
Beijing 100081, China
e-mail: jeffliu@bit.edu.cn

Hao Gong

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District,
Beijing 100081, China
e-mail: gongh0220@163.com

Xiaoyu Ding

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
5 South Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District,
Beijing 100081, China
e-mail: xiaoyu.ding@bit.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 28, 2017; final manuscript received April 19, 2018; published online May 23, 2018. Assoc. Editor: David Myszka.

J. Mech. Des 140(7), 072301 (May 23, 2018) (8 pages) Paper No: MD-17-1661; doi: 10.1115/1.4040167 History: Received September 28, 2017; Revised April 19, 2018

Recently, the wedge self-locking nut, a special anti-loosening product, is receiving more attention because of its excellent reliability in preventing loosening failure under vibration conditions. The key characteristic of a wedge self-locking nut is the special wedge ramp at the root of the thread. In this work, the effect of ramp angle on the anti-loosening ability of wedge self-locking nuts was studied systematically based on numerical simulations and experiments. Wedge self-locking nuts with nine ramp angles (10 deg, 15 deg, 20 deg, 25 deg, 30 deg, 35 deg, 40 deg, 45 deg, and 50 deg) were modeled using a finite element (FE) method, and manufactured using commercial production technology. Their anti-loosening abilities under transversal vibration conditions were analyzed based on numerical and experimental results. It was found that there is a threshold value of the initial preload below which the wedge self-locking nuts would lose their anti-loosening ability. This threshold value of initial preload was then proposed for use as a criterion to evaluate the anti-loosening ability of wedge self-locking nuts quantitatively and to determine the optimal ramp angle. Based on this criterion, it was demonstrated, numerically and experimentally, that a 30 deg wedge ramp resulted in the best anti-loosening ability among nine ramp angles studied. The significance of this study is that it provides an effective method to evaluate the anti-loosening ability of wedge self-locking nuts quantitatively, and determined the optimal ramp angle in terms of anti-loosening ability. The proposed method can also be used to optimize other parameters, such as the material properties and other dimensions, to guarantee the best anti-loosening ability of wedge self-locking nuts.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Topics: Vibration , Wedges , Thread
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Junker, G. H. , 1969, “ New Criteria for Self-Loosening of Fasteners Under Vibration,” SAE Paper No. 690055.
Bickford, J. H. , and Saunders, H. , 1995, An Introduction to the Design and Behaviour of Bolted Joints, 3rd ed., M. Dekker, New York.
Pai, N. G. , and Hess, D. P. , 2002, “ Experimental Study of Loosening of Threaded Fasteners Due to Dynamic Shear Loads,” J. Sound Vib., 253(3), pp. 585–602. [CrossRef]
Pai, N. G. , and Hess, D. P. , 2002, “ Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Threaded Fastener Loosening Due to Dynamic Shear Load,” Eng. Failure. Anal., 9(4), pp. 383–402. [CrossRef]
Izumi, S. , Yokoyama, T. , Iwasaki, A. , and Sakai, S. , 2005, “ Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Tightening and Loosening Mechanism of Threaded Fastener,” Eng. Failure. Anal., 12(4), pp. 604–615. [CrossRef]
Izumi, S. , Kimura, M. , and Sakai, S. , 2007, “ Small Loosening of Bolt-Nut Fastener Due to Micro Bearing-Surface Slip: A Finite Element Method Study,” J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng., 1(11), pp. 1374–1384. [CrossRef]
Dinger, G. , and Friedrich, C. , 2011, “ Avoiding Self-Loosening Failure of Bolted Joints With Numerical Assessment of Local Contact State,” Eng. Failure Anal., 18(8), pp. 2188–2200. [CrossRef]
Lowy, J., 2010, “ NTSB: Cockpit Fire in Boeing 757 From Window Heater, Took 2 Extinguishers to Stop,” The Seattle Times, Seattle, WA, accessed May 10, 2018, https://www.seattletimes.com/business/ntsb-cockpit-fire-in-boeing-757-from-window-heater-took-2-extinguishers-to-stop/
Sase, N. , Nishioka, K. , Koga, S. , and Fujii, H. , 1998, “ An Anti-Loosening Screw-Fastener Innovation and Its Evaluation,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 77(1–3), pp. 209–215. [CrossRef]
Sase, N. , and Fujii, H. , 2001, “ Optimizing Study of SLBs for Higher Anti-Loosening Performance,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 119(1–3), pp. 174–179. [CrossRef]
Ranjan, B. S. C. , Vikranth, H. N. , and Ghosal, A. , 2013, “ A Novel Prevailing Torque Threaded Fastener and Its Analysis,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(10), p. 101007. [CrossRef]
Tremsin, A. S. , Yau, T. Y. , and Kockelmann, W. , 2016, “ Non-Destructive Examination of Loads in Regular and Self-Locking Spiralock® Threads Through Energy Resolved Neutron Imaging,” Strain, 52(6), pp. 548–558. [CrossRef]
Boettcher, A. , 2006, “ Ramp Breaks Common Thread of Fastener Failures,” Mach. Des., 78(19), pp. 82–88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293761807_Ramp_breaks_common_thread_of_fastener_failures
Stanley, 2012, “ Stanley Engineered Fastening,” Stanley, accessed May 10, 2018, https://www.stanleyengineeredfastening.com/product-brands/spiralock/
Holmes, H. D. , 1977, “ Locking Thread Forming Tap,” U.S. Patent No. 4023914. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4023914
Fukuoka, T. , and Nomura, M. , 2008, “ Proposition of Helical Thread Modeling With Accurate Geometry and Finite Element Analysis,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 130(1), p. 011204. [CrossRef]
Zhu, L. , Hong, J. , Yang, G. , Li, B. , and Yang, Z. , 2012, “ The Slippage Analysis at Bearing Surface of Bolted Joints Due to Cyclic Transverse Loads,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2012-86808.
DIN, 2002, “ Aerospace Series-Dynamic Testing of the Locking Characteristics of Fasteners Under Transverse Loading Conditions,” German Institute for Standardization, Berlin, Standard No. DIN 65151.
Jiang, Y. , Zhang, M. , and Lee, C. H. , 2003, “ A Study of Early Stage Self-Loosening of Bolted Joints,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(3), pp. 518–526. [CrossRef]
TFLOCK, 2009, “ TFLOCK, Small thing, Big spirit,” DTFLOCK International Co., Naperville, IL.
Zhu, Y. S. , Song, N. X. , and Huang, Y. T. , 2012, “ Application of Spiralock Thread to Drive Axle Housing,” J. Qingdao Tech. Univ., 34(5), pp. 92–95.
VDI, 2014, “ Systematic Calculation of High Duty Bolted Joints: Joints With One Cylindrical Bolt,” Norm of the Association of German Engineers, Dusseldorf, Germany, Standard No. VDI 2230-1.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of engagement between: (a) a wedge self-locking nut and a regular bolt and (b) a regular nut and bolt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Thread profile of a typical wedge self-locking nut along the axis within a pitch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Key dimensions of the wedge self-locking thread and the regular thread

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Finite element mesh: (a) a wedge self-locking nut, regular bolt, and moving plate and (b) cross section of the threaded part

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relationship between residual preload and vibration cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationship between λt and vibration cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Change in preloads with an increase in vibration cycle under different initial preloads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Building different ramp angles: (a) the thread profile for a wedge self-locking nut and (b) nine typical types of ramp angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Relationship between the threshold value of the initial preload and the ramp angle obtained based on FE models (it should be noted that the curves for sets 1 and 2 are identical)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Nine types of manufactured screw tap and wedge self-locking nut

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Junker test apparatus: (a) picture of the apparatus and (b) schematic of the test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Change in the preload with an increase in vibration cycles for three specimens with 30 deg wedge ramp (initial preload was 7 kN)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experimental results of the preload change with an increase in the vibration cycle for different initial preloads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Relationship between the slope value and initial preload

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Experimental results on the relationship between the threshold value of initial preload and ramp angle




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In