Research Papers: Design for Manufacture and the Life Cycle

Design of Three-Dimensional, Triply Periodic Unit Cell Scaffold Structures for Additive Manufacturing

[+] Author and Article Information
Mazher Iqbal Mohammed

School of Engineering,
Deakin University,
75 Pigdons Road,
Waurn Ponds,
Geelong 3216, VIC, Australia
e-mail: Mazher.mohammed@deakin.edu.au

Ian Gibson

School of Engineering,
Deakin University,
75 Pigdons Road,
Waurn Ponds,
Geelong 3216, VIC, Australia
e-mail: ian.gibson@deakin.edu.au

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design for Manufacturing Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 2, 2017; final manuscript received April 17, 2018; published online May 23, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Paul Witherell.

J. Mech. Des 140(7), 071701 (May 23, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-17-1093; doi: 10.1115/1.4040164 History: Received February 02, 2017; Revised April 17, 2018

Highly organized, porous architectures leverage the true potential of additive manufacturing (AM) as they can simply not be manufactured by any other means. However, their mainstream usage is being hindered by the traditional methodologies of design which are heavily mathematically orientated and do not allow ease of controlling geometrical attributes. In this study, we aim to address these limitations through a more design-driven approach and demonstrate how complex mathematical surfaces, such as triply periodic structures, can be used to generate unit cells and be applied to design scaffold structures in both regular and irregular volumes in addition to hybrid formats. We examine the conversion of several triply periodic mathematical surfaces into unit cell structures and use these to design scaffolds, which are subsequently manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF) additive manufacturing. We present techniques to convert these functions from a two-dimensional surface to three-dimensional (3D) unit cell, fine tune the porosity and surface area, and examine the nuances behind conversion into a scaffold structure suitable for 3D printing. It was found that there are constraints in the final size of unit cell that can be suitably translated through a wider structure while still allowing for repeatable printing, which ultimately restricts the attainable porosities and smallest printed feature size. We found this limit to be approximately three times the stated precision of the 3D printer used this study. Ultimately, this work provides guidance to designers/engineers creating porous structures, and findings could be useful in applications such as tissue engineering and product light-weighting.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Huang, G. L. , Zhou, S. G. , and Chio, T. H. , 2016, “ Lightweight Perforated Horn Antenna Enabled by 3-D Metal-Direct-Printing,” IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Fajardo, Puerto Rico, June 26–July 1, pp. 481–482.
Rezaie, R. , Badrossamay, M. , Ghaie, A. , and Moosavi, H. , 2013, “ Topology Optimization for Fused Deposition Modeling Process,” Procedia CIRP, 6, pp. 521–526. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q. , Zhang, K. , and Hu, G. , 2016, “ Smart Three-Dimensional Lightweight Structure Triggered From a Thin Composite Sheet Via 3D Printing Technique,” Sci. Rep., 6(1), p. 22431. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hutmacher, D. W. , 2001, “ Scaffold Design and Fabrication Technologies for Engineering Tissues—State of the Art and Future Perspectives,” J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed., 12(1), pp. 107–124. [CrossRef]
Domingos, M. , Chiellini, F. , Gloria, A. , Ambrosio, L. , Bartolo, P. , and Chiellini, E. , 2012, “ Effect of Process Parameters on the Morphological and Mechanical Properties of 3D Bioextruded Poly (ϵ-Caprolactone) Scaffolds,” Rapid Prototyping J., 18(1), pp. 56–67. [CrossRef]
Hollister, S. J. , 2005, “ Porous Scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering,” Nat. Mater., 4(7), pp. 518–524. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Roohani-Esfahani, S.-I. , Newman, P. , and Zreiqat, H. , 2016, “ Design and Fabrication of 3D Printed Scaffolds With a Mechanical Strength Comparable to Cortical Bone to Repair Large Bone Defects,” Sci. Rep., 6(1), p. 19468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, X.-Y. , Fang, G. , and Zhou, J. , 2017, “ Additively Manufactured Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and the Prediction of Their Mechanical Behavior: A Review,” Materials, 10(1), p. 50. [CrossRef]
Dean, L. T. , and Pei, E. , 2012, “ Experimental 3D Digital Techniques in Design Practice,” Second International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC), Glasgow, UK, Sept. 18–20, pp. 220–226.
Atkinson, P. , Unver, E. , Marshall, J. , and Dean, L. T. , 2009, “ Post Industrial Manufacturing Systems: The Undisciplined Nature of Generative Design,” Design Research Society Conference, Sheffield, UK, July 16–19.
Buswell, R. A. , Soar, R. C. , Gibb, A. G. F. , and Thorpe, A. , 2007, “ Freeform Construction: Mega-Scale Rapid Manufacturing for Construction,” Autom. Constr., 16(2), pp. 224–231. [CrossRef]
Lim, S. , Buswell, R. A. , Le, T. T. , Austin, S. A. , Gibb, A. G. F. , and Thorpe, T. , 2012, “ Developments in Construction-Scale Additive Manufacturing Processes,” Autom. Constr., 21, pp. 262–268. [CrossRef]
Michielsen, K. , and Stavenga, D. G. , 2008, “ Gyroid Cuticular Structures in Butterfly Wing Scales: Biological Photonic Crystals,” J. R. Soc., Interface, 5(18), pp. 85–94. [CrossRef]
Cao, X. , Xu, D. , Yao, Y. , Han, L. , Terasaki, O. , and Che, S. , 2016, “ Interconversion of Triply Periodic Constant Mean Curvature Surface Structures: From Double Diamond to Single Gyroid,” Chem. Mater., 28(11), pp. 3691–3702. [CrossRef]
Melchels, F. P. W. , Bertoldi, K. , Gabbrielli, R. , Velders, A. H. , Feijen, J. , and Grijpma, D. W. , 2010, “ Mathematically Defined Tissue Engineering Scaffold Architectures Prepared by Stereolithography,” Biomaterials, 31(27), pp. 6909–6916. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mohammed, M. I. , Badwal, P. S. , and Gibson, I. , 2017, “ Design and Fabrication Considerations for Three Dimensional Scaffold Structures,” KnE Eng., 2(2), pp. 120–126. [CrossRef]
Wang, Y. , 2007, “ Periodic Surface Modeling for Computer Aided Nano Design,” Comput.-Aided Des., 39(3), pp. 179–189. [CrossRef]
Kadkhodapour, J. , Montazerian, H. , and Raeisi, S. , 2014, “ Investigating Internal Architecture Effect in Plastic Deformation and Failure for TPMS-Based Scaffolds Using Simulation Methods and Experimental Procedure,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: C, 43, pp. 587–597. [CrossRef]
Karcher, H. , and Polthier, K. , 1996, “ Construction of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A, 354(1715), pp. 2077–2104. [CrossRef]
Yoo, D.-J. , 2011, “ Computer-Aided Porous Scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering Using Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 12(1), pp. 61–71. [CrossRef]
Yoo, D.-J. , 2012, “ Heterogeneous Porous Scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering Using Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 13(4), pp. 527–537. [CrossRef]
Shin, J. , Kim, S. , Jeong, D. , Lee, H. G. , Lee, D. , Lim, J. Y. , and Kim, J. , 2012, “ Finite Element Analysis of Schwarz P Surface Pore Geometries for Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds,” Math. Probl. Eng., 2012, p. 694194. [CrossRef]
Afshar, M. , Anaraki, A. P. , Montazerian, H. , and Kadkhodapour, J. , 2016, “ Additive Manufacturing and Mechanical Characterization of Graded Porosity Scaffolds Designed Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Architectures,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 62, pp. 481–494. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yang, N. , Quan, Z. , Zhang, D. , and Tian, Y. , 2014, “ Multi-Morphology Transition Hybridization CAD Design of Minimal Surface Porous Structures for Use in Tissue Engineering,” Comput.-Aided Des., 56, pp. 11–21. [CrossRef]
Schoen, A. H. , 1970, “ Infinite Periodic Minimal Surfaces Without Self-Intersections,” NASA Electronics Research Center, Cambridge, MA, Technical Report No. NASA-TN-D-5541. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19700020472
Yoo, D. J. , 2011, “ Porous Scaffold Design Using the Distance Field and Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Models,” Biomaterials, 32(31), pp. 7741–7754. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gibson, I. , Rosen, D. , and Stucker, B. , 2014, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, Springer, New York.
Fukuda, A. , Takemoto, M. , Saito, T. , Fujibayashi, S. , Neo, M. , Pattanayak, D. K. , Matsushita, T. , Sasaki, K. , Nishida, N. , Kokubo, T. , and Nakamura, T. , 2011, “ Osteoinduction of Porous Ti Implants With a Channel Structure Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting,” Acta Biomater., 7(5), pp. 2327–2336. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mohammed, M. I. , Fitzpatrick, A. P. , and Gibson, I. , 2017, “ Customised Design of a Patient Specific 3D Printed Whole Mandible Implant,” KnE Eng., 2(2), pp. 104–111. [CrossRef]
Chin Ang, K. , Fai Leong, K. , Kai Chua, C. , and Chandrasekaran, M. , 2006, “ Investigation of the Mechanical Properties and Porosity Relationships in Fused Deposition Modelling‐Fabricated Porous Structures,” Rapid Prototyping J., 12(2), pp. 100–105. [CrossRef]
Yan, C. , Hao, L. , Hussein, A. , and Young, P. , 2015, “ Ti–6Al–4V Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Structures for Bone Implants Fabricated Via Selective Laser Melting,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 51, pp. 61–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Fitzpatrick, A. , Mohammed, M. I. , Collins, P. K. , and Gibson, I. , 2017, “ Design of a Patient Specific, 3D Printed Arm Cast,” KnE Eng., 2(2), pp. 135–142. [CrossRef]
Taha, A. , 2016, “ MathMod 4.1,” accessed May 15, 2018, https://sourceforge.net/projects/mathmod/
Materialise, 2017, “ 3-Matic STL,” 11.0 ed., Materialise, Leuven, Belgium.
Materialise, 2017, “ Magics,” 21st ed., Materialise, Leuven, Belgium.
Cengiz, I. F. , Pitikakis, M. , Cesario, L. , Parascandolo, P. , Vosilla, L. , Viano, G. , Oliveira, J. M. , and Reis, R. L. , 2016, “ Building the Basis for Patient-Specific Meniscal Scaffolds: From Human Knee MRI to Fabrication of 3D Printed Scaffolds,” Bioprinting, 1–2, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Materialise, 2017, “ Mimics,” 19th ed., Materialise, Leuven, Belgium.
Mohammed, M. I. , Tatineni, J. , Cadd, B. , Peart, G. , and Gibson, I. , 2017, “ Advanced Auricular Prosthesis Development by 3D Modelling and Multi-Material Printing,” KnE Eng., 2(2), pp. 37–43. [CrossRef]
Mohammed, M. I. , Cadd, B. , Peart, G. , and Gibson, I. , 2018, “ Augmented Patient-Specific Facial Prosthesis Production Using Medical Imaging Modelling and 3D Printing Technologies for Improved Patient Outcomes,” Virtual Phys. Prototyping, epub.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Various unit cell renderings, comprising (i) Schwarz P surface, (ii) Schwarz D surface, (iii) Schoen I-WP surface, (iv) Schwarz P branching unit, (v) Schwarz D branching unit, and (vi) Schoen I-WP branching unit. (b) A table summarizing the mathematical formula and boundary conditions used to render the respective unit cell.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Methodology for the construction of surface style unit cells, (b) methodology for the construction of branching style unit cells, (c) a table illustrating the baseline properties of the unit cells developed in this study, and (d) methodology for the construction of a given scaffold structure, highlighting the wrapping methodology by which the porosity can be adjusted

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Thickness color maps for (i) the Schoen branching style unit cell and (ii) the resulting scaffold of the Schoen branching unit cell. (b) Graphs illustrating the change in porosity increases scaffold thickness for (i) the surface style unit cells and (ii) the branching style unit cells. (c) Graphs illustrating the change in surface area resulting from the changes in the scaffold porosity for (i) the surface style unit cells and (ii) the branching style unit cells.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) (i) Design of a test standard tessellation language file to examine the print precision for structures of varying widths and heights where vertical lines are of widths a = 600 μm, b = 400 μm, c = 200 μm, d = 100 μm and heights 1 = 400 μm, 2 = 200 μm, and 3 = 100 μm. Each “star” structure comprises lines of equal width and height, as stated in the diagram. (ii) The resulting print of the test structure on the examined FFF 3D printer, highlighting structures that were not printed. (b) Three-dimensional height color maps of a (i) flat and (ii) straight raised printed section of the test structures. (c) A table summarizing the designed and printed geometrical features found on the test structure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) An example of a hybrid scaffold comprising a superimposed 2 × 2 and 3 × 3 unit cell derived cylindrical scaffold. (b) (i) CT scan image of a patients upper body, with the highlighted region of the bone in the arms and (ii) digital model of the extracted humerus, the segmented humerus with integrated anatomy specific scaffolds and the resulting 3D printed model of the scaffolds and bone.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) (i) Scaffold thickness tests using the Schwarz Primitive surface based unit cell for wrap closing distances of 0.1 = 0.38 mm, 0.2 = 0.53 mm, and 0.3 = 0.67 mm thickness scaffolds. (ii) Print tests of the lower precision limit for scaffold pore size, comprising the Schwarz Diamond branching unit cell for a uniform x = y = z unit cell size of 1 mm (pore of 0.9 mm), 2 mm (pore of 1.3 mm), and 3 mm (pore of 1.95 mm). (b) Test example prints for the designed Schwarz P, Schwarz D, and Schoen I-WP scaffolds for a unit cell size of 10 mm, within a cylinder of radius 25 mm, height 30 mm, and a wrap gap closing distance of 0.5.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In