Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Characterizing the Effects of Multiple Analogs and Extraneous Information for Novice Designers in Design-by-Analogy

[+] Author and Article Information
Hyeon Ik Song

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
e-mail: hyeoniksong@gatech.edu

Ricardo Lopez

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843-3123
e-mail: r.lopez87@gmail.com

Katherine Fu

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
e-mail: katherine.fu@me.gatech.edu

Julie Linsey

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
e-mail: julie.linsey@me.gatech.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received May 16, 2017; final manuscript received November 15, 2017; published online December 21, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Katja Holtta-Otto.

J. Mech. Des 140(3), 031101 (Dec 21, 2017) (13 pages) Paper No: MD-17-1340; doi: 10.1115/1.4038565 History: Received May 16, 2017; Revised November 15, 2017

This study examines how the quantity of ideas and analog transfer in design-by-analogy (DbA) are affected by multiple analogs and extraneous information, or noise, using a between-subjects, factorial experiment. To evaluate the effects of multiple analogs and noise on ideation, the study uses two metrics in conjunction with one another; namely, number of ideas (most typical in engineering design) and recognition of high-level principle (more common in psychology). The quantity analysis included three components: number of ideas generated, number of ideas that use example products (analogs and noise stimuli), and number of ideas that use analogs. The results indicate two important findings: (1) providing multiple analogs during ideation had a positive impact on ideation quantity and analog transfer. Specifically, the number of analog-based ideas increased with increasing number of analogs but eventually reached a “saturation point”; (2) introducing extraneous information (noise) diminished the successful mapping of analogs to design solutions. The presence of extraneous information did not significantly affect student designers' ability to identify high-level principles in analogs. The study demonstrated that some extraneous information was perceived as surface similar analogs. Any design analog retrieval method or automated tool will produce extraneous information, and more work is needed to understand and minimize its impact.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Topics: Noise (Sound) , Design
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Foray, D. , 2002, “ Intellectual Property and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy,” Can. J. Policy Res. (ISUMA), 3(1), pp. 1–12. http://www.sristi.org/mdpipr2004/desirable_readings/DR%201.pdf
Leclercq, P. , and Heylighen, A. , 2002, “ 5. 8 Analogies Per Hour,” Artificial Intelligence in Design '02, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 285–303. [CrossRef]
Basalla, G. , 1988, The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Linsey, J. , Wood, K. , and Markman, A. , 2008, “ Increasing Innovation: Presentation and Evaluation of the WordTree Design-by-Analogy Method,” ASME Paper No. DETC2008-49317.
Linsey, J. , Markman, A. , and Wood, K. , 2012, “ Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(4), p. 041009. [CrossRef]
Casakin, H. , and Goldshmidt, G. , 1999, “ Expertise and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design Education,” Des. Stud., 20(2), pp. 153–175. [CrossRef]
Christensen, B. T. , and Schunn, C. , 2007, “ The Relationship of Analogical Distance to Analogical Function and Pre-Inventive Structures: The Case of Engineering Design,” Mem. Cognit., 35(1), pp. 29–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mak, T. W. , and Shu, L. H. , 2004, “ Abstraction of Biological Analogies for Design,” CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol., 53(1), pp. 117–120. [CrossRef]
Gick, M. L. , and Holyoak, K. J. , 1980, “ Analogical Problem Solving,” Cognit. Psychol., 12(3), pp. 306–355. [CrossRef]
Keane, M. T. , 1988, Analogical Problem Solving, Wiley, New York.
Gick, M. L. , and Holyoak, K. J. , 1983, “ Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer,” Cognit. Psychol., 15(1), pp. 1–38. [CrossRef]
Markman, A. B. , and Gentner, D. , 1993, “ Structural Alignment During Similarity Comparisons,” Cognit. Psychol., 25(4), pp. 431–467. [CrossRef]
Gentner, D. , and Structure, M. , 1983, “ A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognit. Sci., 7(2), pp. 155–170. [CrossRef]
Eckert, C. , and Stacey, M. , 2000, “ Sources of Inspiration: A Language of Design,” Des. Stud., 21(5), pp. 523–538. [CrossRef]
Namy, L. L. , and Gentner, D. , 2002, “ Making a Silk Purse Out of Two Sow's Ears: Young Children's Use of Comparison in Category Learning,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen., 131(1), pp. 5–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reeves, L. M. , and Weisberg, R. W. , 1994, “ The Role of Content and Abstract Information in Analogical Transfer,” Psychol. Bull., 115(3), pp. 381–400. [CrossRef]
Holyoak, K. J. , and Thagard, P. , 1989, “ Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction,” Cognit. Sci., 13(3), pp. 295–355. [CrossRef]
Ross, B. H. , 1987, “ This Is Like That: The Use of Earlier Problems and the Separations of Similarity Effects,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit., 13(4), pp. 629–639. [CrossRef]
Goel, A. K. , 1997, “ Design, Analogy, and Creativity,” IEEE Expert, 12(3), pp. 62–70. [CrossRef]
Nersessian, N. J. , 1999, Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. [CrossRef]
Gentner, D. , and Markman, A. B. , 1997, “ Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity,” Am. Psychol., 52(1), pp. 45–56. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J. , 2007, “ Design-by-Analogy and Representation in Innovative Engineering Concept Generation,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/3787
Otto, K. , and Wood, K. , 2001, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design, and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Ross, B. , and Kilbane, M. C. , 1997, “ Effects of Principle Explanation and Superficial Similarity on Analogical Mapping in Problem Solving,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit., 23(2), pp. 427–440. [CrossRef]
Bernardo, A. B. I. , 2001, “ Principle Explanation and Strategic Schema Abstraction in Problem Solving,” Mem. Cognit., 29(4), pp. 627–633. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Richland, L. E. , and McDonough, I. M. , 2010, “ Learning by Analogy: Discriminating Between Potential Analogs,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 35(1), pp. 28–43. [CrossRef]
Lopez de Mantaras, R. , McSherry, D. , Bridge, D. , Leake, D. , Smyth, B. , Craw, S. , Faltings, B. , Maher, M. L. , Cox, M. T. , Forbus, K. , Keane, M. , Aamodt, A. , and Watson, I. , 2005, “ Retrieval, Reuse, Revision, and Retention in Case-Based Reasoning,” Knowl. Eng. Rev., 20(3), pp. 215–240. [CrossRef]
Holyoak, K. , and Koh, K. , 1987, “ Surface and Structural Similarity in Analogical Transfer,” Mem. Cognit., 15(4), pp. 332–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ross, B. , 1984, “ Remindings and Their Effects in Learning a Cognitive Skill,” Cognit. Psychol., 16(3), pp. 371–416. [CrossRef]
Gilovich, T. , 1981, “ Seeing the Past in the Present: The Effect of Associations to Familiar Events on Judgments and Decisions,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 40(5), p. 797. [CrossRef]
Chi, M. T. H. , Feltovich, P. J. , and Glaser, R. , 1981, “ Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices,” Cognit. Sci., 5(2), pp. 121–152. [CrossRef]
Dahl, D. W. , and Moreau, P. , 2002, “ The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation,” J. Mark. Res., 39(1), pp. 47–60. [CrossRef]
Wilson, J. O. , Rosen, D. , Nelson, B. A. , and Yen, J. , 2010, “ The Effects of Biological Examples in Idea Generation,” Des. Stud., 31(2), pp. 169–186. [CrossRef]
Loewenstein, J. , Thompson, L. , and Gentner, D. , 1999, “ Analogical Encoding Facilitates Knowledge Transfer in Negotiation,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 6(4), pp. 586–597. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Linsey, J. S. , Tseng, I. , Fu, K. , Cagan, J. , Wood, K. L. , and Schunn, C. , 2010, “ A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(4), p. 041003. [CrossRef]
Gentner, D. , Loewenstein, J. , and Thompson, L. , 2003, “ Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding,” J. Educ. Psychol., 95(2), pp. 393–405. [CrossRef]
Perttula, M. K. , and Liikkanen, L. A. , 2006, “ Structural Tendencies and Exposure Effects in Design Idea Generation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2006-99123.
Vasconcelos, L. A. , and Crilly, N. , 2016, “ Inspiration and Fixation: Questions, Methods, Findings, and Challenges,” Des. Stud., 42, pp. 1–32. [CrossRef]
Jansson, D. G. , and Smith, S. M. , 1991, “ Design Fixation,” Des. Stud., 12(1), pp. 3–11. [CrossRef]
Valacich, J. S. , Mennecke, B. E. , Wachter, R. , and Wheeler, B. C. , 1993, “ Computer-Mediated Idea Generation: The Effects of Group Size and Group Heterogeneity,” 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, Jan. 8, pp. 152–160.
Diehl, M. , and Stroebe, W. , 1987, “ Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups—Toward the Solution of a Riddle,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 53(3), pp. 497–509. [CrossRef]
Gallupe, R. B. , Dennis, A. R. , Cooper, W. H. , Valacich, J. S. , Bastianutti, L. M. , and Nunamaker, J. F. , 1992, “ Electronic Brainstorming and Group-Size,” Acad. Manage. J., 35(2), pp. 350–369. [CrossRef]
Milliken, G. A. , and Johnson, D. E. , 2009, Analysis of Messy Data, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [CrossRef]
Tseng, I. , Moss, J. , Cagan, J. , and Kotovsky, K. , 2008, “ The Role of Timing and Analogical Similarity in the Stimulation of Idea Generation in Design,” Des. Stud., 29(3), pp. 203–221. [CrossRef]
Yoon, H. J. , Sung, S. Y. , Choi, J. N. , Lee, K. , and Kim, S. , 2015, “ Tangible and Intangible Rewards and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Situational Extrinsic Motivation,” Creativity Res. J., 27(4), pp. 383–393. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, S. , Wallace, K. M. , and Blessing, L. T. , 2003, “ Understanding the Differences Between How Novice and Experienced Designers Approach Design Tasks,” Res. Eng. Des., 14(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Chrysikou, E. G. , and Weisberg, R. W. , 2005, “ Following the Wrong Footsteps: Fixation Effects of Pictorial Examples in a Design Problem-Solving Task,” J. Exp. Psychol.-Learn. Mem. Cognit., 31(5), pp. 1134–1148. [CrossRef]
Cheng, P. Y. , Mugge, R. , and Schoormans, J. P. L. , 2014, “ A New Strategy to Reduce Design Fixation: Presenting Partial Photographs to Designers,” Des. Stud., 35(4), pp. 374–391. [CrossRef]
Crilly, N. , 2015, “ Fixation and Creativity in Concept Development: The Attitudes and Practices of Expert Designers,” Des. Stud., 38, pp. 54–91. [CrossRef]
Sio, U. N. , Kotovsky, K. , and Cagan, J. , 2015, “ Fixation or Inspiration? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Role of Examples on Design Processes,” Des. Stud., 39, pp. 70–99. [CrossRef]
Lopez, R. , 2011, “ Characterizing the Effects of Noise and Domain Distance in Analogous Design,” Master of Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Lopez, R. , Linsey, J. S. , and Smith, S. M. , 2011, “ Characterizing the Effect of Domain Distance in Design-by-Analogy,” ASME Paper No. DETC2011-48428.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the analogical reasoning process. Adapted from Ref. [16].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Drawing of locking mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Design problem statement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Analogs used as stimuli in study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Number of ideas generated, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pure noise used as stimuli in study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Noise with elasticity as surface feature used as stimuli in study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Number of ideas that use example products, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Number of ideas that analogs, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sample ideation sketches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Percentage of high-level principle recognition rate in stage I

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The mean similarity ratings between ideas and example product, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Rating of example product's usefulness, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Number of ideas that use analogs, pure noise, and noise w/surface feature over time, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Rating of difficulty of similarity task, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Number of analogs used in idea generation, error bars show ± one standard error

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Rating of use of given example products, error bars show ± one standard error



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In