Research Papers: Variability/Uncertainty in D3

Modeling the Variability of Glenoid Geometry in Intact and Osteoarthritic Shoulders

[+] Author and Article Information
Charlotte M. de Vries

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University Erie,
Erie, PA 16510
e-mail: devries@psu.edu

Matthew B. Parkinson

Engineering Design Program,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: parkinson@psu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received January 27, 2017; final manuscript received July 19, 2017; published online October 2, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Charlie C. L. Wang.

J. Mech. Des 139(11), 111410 (Oct 02, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: MD-17-1066; doi: 10.1115/1.4037408 History: Received January 27, 2017; Revised July 19, 2017

The objective of this research is to model the geometric variability of the glenoid of the scapula. The glenoid is the “socket” component of the “ball and socket” connection of the shoulder joint. The model must capture the observed variability with sufficient resolution such that it informs both operative and design decisions. Creating the model required the application of existing mathematical and statistical modeling approaches, including geometric fitting, radial basis functions (RBFs), and principal component analysis (PCA). The landmark identification process represented the glenoid in a new manner. This work was validated against existing approaches and computed tomography (CT) scans from 42 patients. Information on the range of shoulder geometries can assist with preoperative planning as well as implant design for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). PCA was used to quantify the variability of shape across landmarks used to represent the glenoid shape. These landmark locations could be used to generate full surface meshes of existing glenoids or new glenoid models synthesized by changing principal components (PC). The process of creation of these shoulder geometries may be useful for the study of other joints. The models created will help surgeons and engineers to understand the effects of osteoarthritis on bone geometry, as well as the range of variability present in healthy shoulders.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Harryman, D. , Sidles, J. , Clark, J. , McQuade, K. , Gibb, T. , and Matsen, F. , 1990, “ Translation of the Humeral Head on the Glenoid With Passive Glenohumeral Motion,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol., 72(9), pp. 1334–1343. [CrossRef]
Kelkar, R. , Wang, V. , Flatow, E. , Newton, P. , Ateshian, G. , Bigliani, L. , Pawluk, R. , and Mow, V. , 2001, “ Glenohumeral Mechanics: A Study of Articular Geometry, Contact, and Kinematics,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 10(1), pp. 73–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Soslowsky, L. , Flatow, E. , Bigliani, L. , and Mow, V. , 1992, “ Articular Geometry of the Glenohumeral Joint,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 285, pp. 181–190.
Bryce, C. , Davison, A. , Okita, N. , Lewis, G. , Sharkey, N. , and Armstrong, A. , 2010, “ A Biomechanical Study of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss and Humeral Head Translation,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 19(7), pp. 994–1002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Torchia, M. E. , Cofield, R. H. , and Settergren, C. R. , 1997, “ Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With the Neer Prosthesis: Long-Term Results,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 6(6), pp. 495–505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sperling, J. W. , Cofield, R. H. , and Rowland, C. M. , 1998, “ Neer Hemiarthroplasty and Neer Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Fifty Years Old or Less. Long-Term Results,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. (Am.), 80(4), pp. 464–473. [CrossRef]
Boileau, P. , Avidor, C. , Krishnan, S. G. , Walch, G. , Kempf, J.-F. , and Molé, D. , 2002, “ Cemented Polyethylene Versus Uncemented Metal-Backed Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Study,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 11(4), pp. 351–359. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Papadonikolakis, A. , and Matsen, F. A. , 2014, “ Metal-Backed Glenoid Components Have a Higher Rate of Failure and Fail by Different Modes in Comparison With All-Polyethylene Components,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 96(12), pp. 1041–1047. [CrossRef]
Wallace, A. L. , Walsh, W. R. , and Sonnabend, D. H. , 1999, “ Dissociation of the Glenoid Component in Cementless Total Shoulder Arthroplasty,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 8(1), pp. 81–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nyffeler, R. W. , Sheikh, R. , Atkinson, T. S. , Jacob, H. A. , Favre, P. , and Gerber, C. , 2006, “ Effects of Glenoid Component Version on Humeral Head Displacement and Joint Reaction Forces: An Experimental Study,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 15(5), pp. 625–629. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bryce, C. , Pennypacker, J. , Kulkarni, N. , Paul, E. , Hollenbeak, C. , Mosher, T. , and Armstrong, A. , 2008, “ Validation of Three-Dimensional Models of In Situ Scapulae,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 17(5), pp. 825–832. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Budge, M. , Lewis, G. , Schaefer, E. , Coquia, S. , Flemming, D. , and Armstrong, A. , 2011, “ Comparison of Standard Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Corrected Glenoid Version Measurements,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 20(4), pp. 577–583. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lewis, G. , and Armstrong, A. , 2011, “ Glenoid Spherical Orientation and Version,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 20(1), pp. 3–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kirane, Y. , Lewis, G. , Sharkey, N. , and Armstrong, A. , 2011, “ Mechanical Characteristics of a Novel Posterior-Step Prosthesis for Biconcave Glenoid Defects,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 21(1), pp. 105–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Walch, G. , Vezeridis, P. S. , Boileau, P. , Deransart, P. , and Chaoui, J. , 2015, “ Three-Dimensional Planning and Use of Patient-Specific Guides Improve Glenoid Component Position: An In Vitro Study,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 24(2), pp. 302–309. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sabesan, V. , Callanan, M. , Sharma, V. , and Iannotti, J. P. , 2014, “ Correction of Acquired Glenoid Bone Loss in Osteoarthritis With a Standard Versus an Augmented Glenoid Component,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 23(7), pp. 964–973. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nadadur, G. , and Parkinson, M. , 2008, “ Extrapolation of Anthropometric Measures to New Populations,” SAE Paper No. 2008-01-1858.
Chu, C.-H. , Tsai, Y.-T. , Wang, C. C. , and Kwok, T.-H. , 2010, “ Exemplar-Based Statistical Model for Semantic Parametric Design of Human Body,” Comput. Ind., 61(6), pp. 541–549. [CrossRef]
Parkinson, M. , and Reed, M. , 2009, “ Creating Virtual User Populations by Analysis of Anthropometric Data,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 40(1), pp. 106–111. [CrossRef]
Mahfouz, M. , Fatah, E. E. A. , Bowers, L. S. , and Scuderi, G. , 2012, “ Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Knee Reveals Ethnic Differences,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 470(1), pp. 172–185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dai, Y. , and Bischoff, J. E. , 2013, “ Comprehensive Assessment of Tibial Plateau Morphology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Influence of Shape and Size on Anthropometric Variability,” J. Orthop. Res., 31(10), pp. 1643–1652. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Carr, J. C. , Beatson, R. K. , Cherrie, J. B. , Mitchell, T. J. , Fright, W. R. , McCallum, B. C. , and Evans, T. R. , 2001, “ Reconstruction and Representation of 3D Objects With Radial Basis Functions,” 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, Aug. 12–17, pp. 67–76.
Ohtake, Y. , Belyaev, A. , and Seidel, H.-P. , 2003, “ A Multi-Scale Approach to 3D Scattered Data Interpolation With Compactly Supported Basis Functions,” IEEE Shape Modeling International (SMI), Seoul, South Korea, May 12–15, pp. 153–161.
Morse, B. S. , Yoo, T. S. , Rheingans, P. , Chen, D. T. , and Subramanian, K. R. , 2005, “ Interpolating Implicit Surfaces From Scattered Surface Data Using Compactly Supported Radial Basis Functions,” ACM SIGGRAPH Courses, Los Angeles, CA, July 31–Aug. 4, p. 78.
Noe, K. O. , Tanderup, K. , and Sorensen, T. , 2011, “ Surface Membrane Based Bladder Registration for Evaluation of Accumulated Dose During Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer,” IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Chicago, IL, Mar. 30–Apr. 2, pp. 1253–1256.
Bennink, H. , Korbeeck, J. , Janssen, B. , and ter Haar Romeny, B. M. , 2007, “ Warping a Neuro-Anatomy Atlas on 3D MRI Data With Radial Basis Functions,” Third Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Dec. 11–14, pp. 28–32.
Li, Z. , Hu, J. , Reed, M. P. , Rupp, J. D. , Hoff, C. N. , Zhang, J. , and Cheng, B. , 2011, “ Development, Validation, and Application of a Parametric Pediatric Head Finite Element Model for Impact Simulations,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 39(12), pp. 2984–2997. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Turk, M. , and Pentland, A. , 1991, “ Eigenfaces for Recognition,” J. Cognit. Neurosci., 3(1), pp. 71–86. [CrossRef]
Allen, B. , Curless, B. , and Popović, Z. , 2003, “ The Space of Human Body Shapes: Reconstruction and Parameterization From Range Scans,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 22(3), pp. 587–594. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The lateral and dorsal views of a healthy left scapula labeled with the parts described in this report. A directional compass is listed at the bottom right of each view. This image was created in osirix using the CT scan of a patient.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The osirix 3D volume rendering of a CT scan of a patient, with the bone CT scan presets. The scapula is not isolated, but is seen with the humerus, clavicle, and rib cage. The humerus and scapula are labeled, along with the glenoid and humeral head at the joint.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Overview of the method used to create the glenoid models and validate them. This paper discusses the four tasks completed using the processed CT scans: quantify geometry, meshless representation, quantify variability, and synthesize new glenoids. A description of each task can be found in Sec. 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

To determine the orientation of the glenoid relative to the scapula, a sphere is fit to the concave face of the glenoid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The process to validate the each glenoid used to represent base glenoid mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The glenoid and vault created using the mean version of the data. All other shoulders are used by adding linear combinations of the PCs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The curvature, version, and inclination of the synthesized shoulders created by varying PC 1 and PC 2: (a) curvature, (b) version, and (c) inclination

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

A visualization of the transformed glenoids created by varying PC 1 and PC 2. The darker shading represents the PC score density of the intact population. The lighter shading in the bottom right corner represents the PC score density of osteoarthritic shoulders.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In