Research Papers: Design Automation

A Methodology to Synthesize Gearbox and Control Design for Increased Power Production and Blade Root Stress Mitigation in a Small Wind Turbine1

[+] Author and Article Information
Hamid Khakpour Nejadkhaki

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
State University of New York,
Buffalo, NY 14260
e-mail: hamidkha@buffalo.edu

Amrita Lall

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC 27606
e-mail: alall@ncsu.edu

John F. Hall

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
State University of New York,
Buffalo, NY 14260
e-mail: johnhall@buffalo.edu

2Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received August 30, 2016; final manuscript received May 18, 2017; published online June 27, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Massimiliano Gobbi.

J. Mech. Des 139(8), 081404 (Jun 27, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1605; doi: 10.1115/1.4036998 History: Received August 30, 2016; Revised May 18, 2017

Large wind turbines typically have variable rotor speed capability that increases power production. However, the cost of this technology is more significant for small turbines, which have the highest cost-per-watt of energy produced. This work presents a low-cost system for applications where cost and reliability are of concern. The configuration utilizes the fixed-speed squirrel cage induction generator. It is combined with a variable ratio gearbox (VRG) that is based on the automated-manual automotive transmission. The design is simple, low cost and implements reliable components. The VRG increases efficiency in lower wind speeds through three discrete rotor speeds. In this study, it is implemented with active blades. The contribution of this work is a methodology that synthesizes the selection of the gearbox ratios with the control design. The design objectives increase the power production while mitigating the blade stress. Top-down dynamic programming reduces the computational expense of evaluating the performance of multiple gearbox combinations. The procedure is customizable to the wind conditions at an installation site. A case study is presented to demonstrate the ability of the strategy. It employs a 300 kW wind turbine drivetrain model that simulates power production. Two sets of wind data representing low and high wind speed installation sites were used as the input. The results suggest a VRG can improve energy production by up to 10% when the system operates below the rated wind speed. This is also accompanied by a slight increase in the blade-root stress. When operating above the rated speed, the stress decreases through the optimal selection of gear combinations.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

VRG-enabled drivetrain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Procedure for finding aerodynamic loads with BEM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Torque and thrust for wind speed 13 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Mechanical system model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flapwise and edgewise binding

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Control problem formulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Decision-making structure for control

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Power (top) and stress (bottom) for each combination and weight factor for site 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pareto frontier for VRG combinations evaluated at site 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Power (top), stress (middle), and applied gear ratio (bottom) in relation to wind speed, based on site 2 simulation results




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In