0
Research Papers: Design Automation

Modeling and Analysis of a Precise Multibeam Flexural Pivot

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhao Hongzhe

Robotics Institute,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: hongzhezhao@gmail.com

Han Dong

Robotics Institute,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: sy1607604@buaa.edu.cn

Bi Shusheng

Robotics Institute,
Beihang University,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: bishusheng@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received October 28, 2016; final manuscript received April 27, 2017; published online June 15, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Nam H. Kim.

J. Mech. Des 139(8), 081402 (Jun 15, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1726; doi: 10.1115/1.4036836 History: Received October 28, 2016; Revised April 27, 2017

The center shift, a common problem existing in rotating flexural pivots, is diminished in a multibeam flexural pivot by the internal interaction among these beams. The objectives of this paper are to develop a model for this flexural pivot and to analyze the interaction. First, the calculus of variations with a Lagrange multiplier is exploited to develop the model based on energy approach. Then, the properties of a conservative system are utilized to analyze the constraint characteristics of these beams, and two different load sequences are taken into account to formulate the rotating stiffness of the flexural pivot. The three methods that are used to develop the same model are compared to show their respective advantages, and the analysis of the internal constraints offers several significant qualitative and quantitative design insights. Furthermore, the circular arc motion is expanded to the elliptic arc motion, and an approximate replacement is therefore presented. Furthermore, the circular arc motion is expanded to the elliptic arc motion, and an approximate replacement is therefore presented.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Howell, L. L. , 2001, Compliant Mechanisms, Wiley, New York.
Smith, S. T. , 2000, Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
Lobontiu, N. , 2002, Compliant Mechanisms: Design of Flexure Hinges, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Li, J. P. , Zhao, H. W. , Qu, H. , Cui, T. , Fu, L. , Huang, H. , Ren, L. Q. , and Fan, Z. Q. , 2013, “ A Piezoelectric-Driven Rotary Actuator by Means of Inchworm Motion,” Sens. Actuators, A, 194, pp. 269–276. [CrossRef]
Trease, B. , Moon, Y. , and Kota, S. , 2005, “ Design of Large-Displacement Compliant Joints,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(7), pp. 788–798. [CrossRef]
Xu, Q. , 2016, Design and Implementation of Large-Range Compliant Micropositioning Systems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Wittrick, W. H. , 1951, “ The Properties of Crossed Flexural Pivots, and the Influence of the Point at Which the Strips Cross,” Aeronaut. Q., 2(4), pp. 272–292. [CrossRef]
Jensen, B. D. , and Howell, L. L. , 2002, “ The Modeling of Cross-Axis Flexural Pivots,” Mech. Theory, 37(5), pp. 461–476. [CrossRef]
Zhao, H. Z. , and Bi, S. S. , 2010, “ Accuracy Characteristics of the Generalized Cross-Spring Pivot,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45(10), pp. 1434–1448. [CrossRef]
Henein, S. , Spanoudakis, P. , Droz, S. , Myklebust, L. I. , and Onillon, E. , 2003, “ Flexure Pivot for Aerospace Mechanisms,” Tenth European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium (ESMATS), San Sebastián, Spain, Sept. 24–26, Paper No. ESA SP-524.
Xu, Q. , 2015, “ Design of a Large-Range Compliant Rotary Micropositioning Stage With Angle and Torque Sensing,” IEEE Sens. J., 15(4), pp. 2419–2430. [CrossRef]
Xu, Q. , 2013, “ Design and Implementation of a Novel Rotary Micropositioning System Driven by Linear Voice Coil Motor,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 84(5), p. 055001. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xu, Q. S. , 2015, “ Design, Fabrication, and Testing of an MEMS Microgripper With Dual-Axis Force Sensor,” IEEE Sens. J., 15(10), pp. 6017–6026. [CrossRef]
Fowler, R. M. , Maselli, A. , Pluimers, P. , Magleby, S. P. , and Howell, L. L. , 2014, “ Flex-16: A Large-Displacement Monolithic Compliant Rotational Hinge,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 82, pp. 203–217. [CrossRef]
Henein, S. , 2012, “ Short Communication: Flexure Delicacies,” Mech. Sci., 3(1), pp. 1–4. [CrossRef]
Calvet, R. J. , 2000, “ Rotary Flexure,” U.S. Patent No. 6146044.
Bi, S. , Zhao, S. , and Zhu, X. , 2010, “ Dimensionless Design Graphs for Three Types of Annulus-Shaped Flexure Hinges,” Precis. Eng., 34(3), pp. 659–666.
Zhao, H. Z. , and Bi, S. S. , 2010, “ Stiffness and Stress Characteristics of the Generalized Cross-Spring Pivot,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45(3), pp. 378–391. [CrossRef]
Awtar, S. , and Sen, S. , 2010, “ A Generalized Constraint Model for Two-Dimensional Beam Flexures: Nonlinear Strain Energy Formulation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(8), p. 081009. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The loads and displacements of a deformed beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Parameter definitions of a multibeam flexural pivot: (a) geometric parameters, (b) loads and displacements, and (c) the configuration with a negative λ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Deformed configuration in step 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Deformed configuration in steps 2 and 3 (load sequence 1): (a) step 2 (beam end is NOT at the circle) and (b) step 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Deformed configuration in steps 2 and 3 (load sequence 2): (a) step 2 (beam end is NOT at the circle) and (b) step 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Differences between load sequences 1 and 2: (a) differences between steps 1 and 3, (b) load sequence 1, and (c) load sequence 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Boundary constraints for step 3: (a) pinned end and (b) fixed end

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Different boundary constraints in the overall flexural pivot: (a) boundary constraints and axial forces and (b) axial forces are replaced by symmetric constraints

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Boundary constraint of elliptic arc motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Two elliptic arcs are approximately replaced by two circular arcs: (a) elliptic arc 1 and (b) elliptic arc 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

FEA versus the developed model: (a) pivots 1–3 and (b) pivots 4–7

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In