Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Mapping Software Augments Engineering Design Thinking

[+] Author and Article Information
Nathan Eng

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Imperial College London,
Exhibition Road, South Kensington Campus,
London SW7 2AZ, UK
e-mail: pointlinebox@gmail.com

Marco Aurisicchio

Dyson School of Design Engineering,
Imperial College London,
Exhibition Road, South Kensington Campus,
London SW7 2AZ, UK
e-mail: m.aurisicchio@imperial.ac.uk

Rob Bracewell

Rolls-Royce plc.,
7 Thomas Court,
Derby DE1 1AJ, UK
e-mail: rob.bracewell@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 11, 2016; final manuscript received February 9, 2017; published online April 4, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Shapour Azarm.

J. Mech. Des 139(5), 051103 (Apr 04, 2017) (16 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1117; doi: 10.1115/1.4036129 History: Received February 11, 2016; Revised February 09, 2017

Maps are visual design representations used by engineers to model the information behind a design. This paper evaluates the application of mapping methods supported by the Decision Rationale editor (DRed) in aerospace engineering industry. Specifically, the research investigates what DRed mapping methods are used, where engineers find them useful and why. DRed was selected because it has been formally embedded in the design processes of the partner company and all engineering staff have access to it. The tool was investigated using semistructured interviews with 14 engineers, each already trained with DRed through their work and representing diverse departments and experience levels. Nineteen use cases were collected, ranging from high-profile, multistakeholder projects to everyday individual work. Collected cases were analyzed for the methods applied, common contexts of use, and reasons for use. The results validate baseline DRed mapping methods to capture design rationale and analyze the root causes of engineering problems. Further, it provides empirical evidence for new DRed mapping methods to manage requirements, analyze functional interactions in complex systems and manage personal information. The contexts where mapping methods are most used involve: system-level information that cuts across subsystem boundaries; irregular intervals between map applications; dealing with loosely structured information; individual use or small team collaborations; and addressing on-going problems. The reasons stated by engineers for using maps focus on engineering design thinking, communication, and planning support. Using empirical evidence of its recurrent use, this research establishes that DRed is a powerful and versatile tool for engineers in industry and its mapping methods aid important and otherwise unsupported work. The range and impact of the use cases found in practice suggest that engineers need better support for work with loosely structured information. Organizations involved in the design of complex systems should make greater use of semiformal, graph-based visual tools like DRed. The understanding of mapping software gained through this research demonstrates a shift in emphasis from the enrichment of the engineering record to the provision of immediate cognitive benefits for engineers. The results also support an incremental, adaptive approach for deploying this emerging class of tools in other organizations.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Turk, Z. , 2001, “ Phenomenologial Foundations of Conceptual Product Modelling in Architecture, Engineering and Construction,” Artif. Intell. Eng., 15(2), pp. 83–92. [CrossRef]
Crowder, R. , Fowler, D. , Reul, Q. , Sleeman, D. , Shadbolt, N. , and Wills, G. , 2012, “ An Information System to Support the Engineering Designer,” J. Intell. Manuf., 23(5), pp. 1545–1558. [CrossRef]
McAlpine, H. , Hicks, B. , and Tiryakioglu, C. , 2011, “ The Digital Divide: Investigating the Personal Information Management Practices of Engineers,” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Copenhagen, Denmark, Aug. 15–19, pp. 31–32.
Asiedu, Y. , and Gu, P. , 1998, “ Product Life Cycle Cost Analysis: State of the Art Review,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 36(4), pp. 883–908. [CrossRef]
Conklin, J. , and Begeman, M. L. , 1988, “ gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion,” ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 6(4), pp. 303–331. [CrossRef]
Buzan, T. , and Griffiths, C. , 2010, Mind Maps for Business: Revolutionise Your Business Thinking and Practice, Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK.
Qu, Y. , and Furnas, G. W. , 2005, “ Sources of Structure in Sensemaking,” Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA), Portland, OR, Apr. 2–7, pp. 1989–1992.
Buckingham-Shum, S. J. , and Hammond, N. , 1994, “ Argumentation-Based Design Rationale: What Use at What Cost?,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 40(4), pp. 603–652. [CrossRef]
Buckingham-Shum, S. J. , Selvin, A. M. , Sierhuis, M. , Conklin, J. , Haley, C. B. , and Nuseibeh, B. , 2006, “ Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on From gIBIS and QOC,” Rationale Management in Software Engineering, A. Dutoit , R. Mccall , I. Mistrik , and B. Paech , eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 111–132.
Bracewell, R. H. , Wallace, K. M. , Moss, M. , and Knott, D. , 2009, “ Capturing Design Rationale,” Comput. Aided Des., 41(3), pp. 173–186. [CrossRef]
Aurisicchio, M. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Hooey, B. L. , 2016, “ Rationale Mapping and Functional Modelling Enhanced Root Cause Analysis,” Saf. Sci., 85, pp. 241–257. [CrossRef]
REF2014: Research Excellence Framework Impact Case Studies, 2014, “ The Decision Rationale Editor (Case Study 14057),” Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), London, accessed, Nov. 26, 2015, http://impact.ref.ac.uk/casestudies2/refservice.svc/getcasestudypdf/14057
Kunz, W. , and Rittel, H. W. J. , 1970, “ Issues as Elements of Information Systems,” Centre for Planning and Development Research, Berkeley, CA.
Bracewell, R. H. , and Wallace, K. M. , 2003, “ A Tool for Capturing Design Rationale,” The 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Stockholm, Sweden, Aug. 19–21, Paper No. DS31_1437FPB.
Eng, N. L. , Aurisicchio, M. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Armstrong, G. , 2011, “ More Space to Think: Eight Years of Visual Support for Rationale Capture, Creativity and Knowledge Management in Aerospace Engineering,” ASME Paper No. DETC2011-47911.
Eng, N. L. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2009, “ Concept Diagramming Software for Engineering Design Support: A Review and Synthesis of Studies,” ASME Paper No. DETC2009-86840.
Aurisicchio, M. , and Bracewell, R. H. , 2013, “ Capturing an Integrated Design Information Space With a Diagram-Based Approach,” J. Eng. Des., 24(6), pp. 397–428. [CrossRef]
Eng, N. L. , Aurisicchio, M. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Armstrong, G. , 2012, “ Mapping for Design Thinking Support in Industry,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-70959.
Aurisicchio, M. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Armstrong, G. , 2013, “ Supporting Communication in the Supply Chain With Design Rationale Maps,” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Seoul, South Korea, Aug. 19–22, pp. 335–344.
Perry, M. , and Sanderson, D. , 1998, “ Coordinating Joint Design Work: The Role of Communication and Artefacts,” Des. Stud., 19(3), pp. 273–288. [CrossRef]
Ewenstein, B. , and Whyte, J. , 2009, “ Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects’,” Organ. Stud., 30(1), pp. 07–30. [CrossRef]
McAlpine, H. , Hicks, B. , Culley, S. J. , and Huet, G. , 2006, “ An Investigation Into the Use and Content of the Engineer’s Logbook,” Des. Stud., 27(4), pp. 481–504. [CrossRef]
Kurtz, C. F. , and Snowden, D. J. , 2003, “ The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-Making in a Complex and Complicated World,” IBM Syst. J., 42(3), pp. 462–483. [CrossRef]
Novak, J. D. , and Cañas, A. J. , 2008, “ The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them,” Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008.
Cao, Y. , Liu, Y. , and Paredis, C. J. J. , 2011, “ System-Level Model Integration of Design and Simulation for Mechatronic Systems Based on SysML,” Mechatronics, 21(6), pp. 1063–1075. [CrossRef]
Stone, R. B. , Wood, K. L. , and Crawford, R. H. , 2000, “ A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures,” Des. Stud., 21(1), pp. 5–31. [CrossRef]
Henderson, K. , 1999, On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kokotovich, V. , 2008, “ Problem Analysis and Thinking Tools: An Empirical Study of Non-Hierarchical Mind Mapping,” Des. Stud., 29(1), pp. 49–69. [CrossRef]
Marshall, C. C. , Shipman, F. M. , and Coombs, J. H. , 1994, “ VIKI: Spatial Hypertext Supporting Emergent Structure,” ACM European Conference on Hypermedia Technology (ECHT), Edinburgh, Scotland, Sept. 19–23, pp. 13–23.
Bush, V. , 1945, “ As We May Think,” The Atlantic Monthly, Washington, DC, accessed Jan. 23, 2017, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/
Engelbardt, D. C. , 1962, “ Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework,” Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, CA, Report No. AFOSR-3233.
Licklider, J. , and Taylor, R. , 1968, “ The Computer as a Communication Device,” Sci. Technol., 72(2), pp. 21–41.
Nelson, T. H. , 1965, “ Complex Information Processing: A File Structure for the Complex, the Changing and the Indeterminate,” 20th National ACM Conference (ACM), Cleveland, OH, Aug. 24–26, pp. 84–100.
Bernstein, M. , 2003, “ Collage, Composites, Construction,” 14th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT), Nottingham, UK, Aug. 26–30, pp. 122–123.
Shipman, F. M. , Hsieh, H. , Maloor, P. , and Moore, M. , 2001, “ The Visual Knowledge Builder: A Second Generation Spatial Hypertext,” 12th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (HT), Arhus, Denmark, Aug. 14–18, pp. 113–122.
Bernstein, M. , 1999, “ Structural Patterns and Hypertext Rhetoric,” J. ACM Comput. Surv., 31(4), p. 19.
Conklin, J. , 2006, Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Müller, J. , Polansky, D. , Novak, P. , Foltin, C. , and Polivaev, D. , 2016, “ FreeMind—Free Mind Mapping Software,” Sourceforge.net, accessed Jan. 23, 2017, http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/main_page
DesignVUE, 2017, “ Imperial College London Design Engineering Group,” London, accessed Jan. 23, 2017, http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/designengineering/tools/designvue
Compendium Institute, 2012, “ Compendium Institute,” Open University Knowldge Media Institute, Milton Keynes, UK, accessed Jan. 23, 2017, http://compendium.open.ac.uk/institute/
Larkin, J. H. , and Simon, H. A. , 1987, “ Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words,” Cognit. Sci., 11(1), pp. 65–100. [CrossRef]
Liu, Y. , McMahon, C. A. , Ramani, K. , and Schaefer, D. , 2011, “ Editorial for the Special Issue of Information Mining and Retrieval in Design,” Adv. Eng. Inf., 25(2), pp. 117–118. [CrossRef]
Buckingham-Shum, S. J. , MacLean, A. , Bellotti, V. M. E. , and Hammond, N. V. , 1997, “ Graphical Argumentation and Design Cognition,” Hum. Comput. Interact., 12(3), pp. 267–300. [CrossRef]
Eppler, M. J. , and Kernbach, S. , 2016, “ Dynagrams: Enhancing Design Thinking Through Dynamic Diagrams,” Des. Stud., 47, pp. 91–117. [CrossRef]
Conklin, J. , 2003, “ Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study,” Visualising Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, P. Kirschner, S. Buckingham Shum, and C. Carr, eds., Springer, London, pp. 117–136.
Eng, N. L. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2008, “ Studying the Role of Narrative Across Aerospace Knowledge Management Systems,” 59th International Astronautical Congress (IAC’08), Glasgow, UK, Sept. 29–Oct. 3, Paper No. IAC-08-D5.2.10.
Aurisicchio, M. , and Bracewell, R. H. , 2009, “ Engineering Design by Integrated Diagrams,” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Stanford, CA, Aug. 24–27, pp. 301–312.
Blessing, L. T. M. , Chakrabarti, A. , and Wallace, K. M. , 1998, “ An Overview of Descriptive Studies in Relation to a General Design Research Methodology,” Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development, E. Frankenberger , H. Birkhofer , and P. Badke-Schaub , eds., Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 42–56.
Bracewell, R. H. , Gourtovaia, M. , Moss, M. , Knott, D. , Wallace, K. M. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2009, “ DRed 2.0: A Method and Tool for Capture and Communication of Design Knowledge Deliberated in the Creation of Technical Products,” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Palo Alto, CA, Aug. 24–27, pp. 223–234.
Hales, C. , 1991, Analysis of an Engineering Design Process in an Industrial Context, Gants Hill Publications, Hants, UK.
Bucciarelli, L. L. , 1994, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Vinck, D. , 2003, Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gorman, G. E. , Clayton, P. , and Rice-Lively, M. L. , 1997, Qualitative Research for the Information Professional: A Practical Introduction, Library Association Publishing, London.
Vasconcellos, M. , 2008, “ An Experience of the Use of the Cognitive Mapping Method in Qualitative Research,” Knowledge Cartography: Software Tools and Mapping Techniques, A. Okada , S. J. Buckingham-Shum , and T. Sherborne , eds., Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 335–355.
Subrahmanian, E. , Reich, Y. , Konda, S. L. , Dutoit, A. , Cunningham, D. , Patrick, R. , Thomas, M. , and Westerberg, A. W. , 1997, “ The n-dim Approach to Creating Design Support Systems,” ASME Paper No. DETC97/DTM-3873.
Gopsill, J. A. , McAlpine, H. C. , and Hicks, B. J. , 2013, “ A Social Media Framework to Support Engineering Design Communication,” Adv. Eng. Inf., 27(4), pp. 580–597. [CrossRef]
Hooey, B. L. , Aurisicchio, M. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Foyle, D. C. , 2014, “ Evidence-Based Error Analysis: Supporting the Design of Error-Tolerant Systems,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 8512, pp. 401–412.
Aurisicchio, M. , and Bracewell, R. H. , 2013, “ The Function Analysis Diagram: Intended Benefits and Co-Existence With Other Functional Models,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 27(3), pp. 249–257. [CrossRef]
Aurisicchio, M. , Bracewell, R. H. , and Armstrong, G. , 2012, “ The Function Analysis Diagram,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-70944.
Dai, W. , Aurisicchio, M. , and Armstrong, G. , 2012, “ An IBIS Based Approach for the Analysis of Non Functional Requirements,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-71023.
Dai, W. , and Aurisicchio, M. , 2013, “ An Empirical Investigation of Requirement Evolution in an Industrial Project,” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Seoul, South Korea, Aug. 19–22, pp. 369–378.
Datchary, C. , and Licoppe, C. , 2007, “ La Multi-Activité et Ses Appuis: L’Exemple de la ‘Présence Obstinée’ des Messages Dans l’Environnnement de Travail,” Activités, 4(1), Paper No. 1370.
Klein, G. , Moon, B. , and Hoffman, R. R. , 2006, “ Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model,” IEEE Intell. Syst., 21(5), pp. 88–92. [CrossRef]
Durugbo, C. , 2013, “ Integrated Product-Service Analysis Using SysML Requirement Diagrams,” Syst. Eng., 16(1), pp. 111–123. [CrossRef]
INCOSE, 2007, “ Systems Engineering Vision 2020,” International Council on Systems Engineering, San Diego, CA, Doc. No. INCOSE-TP-2004-004-02, accessed Sep. 10, 2016, http://oldsite.incose.org/productspubs/pdf/sevision2020_20071003_v2_03.pdf
Poenisch, V. , and Clark, A. , 2006, “ Elements of an Interface Standard for Knowledge Sources in Knowledge-Based Engineering,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 6(1), pp. 78–83. [CrossRef]
VanSchaik, J. , Scanlan, J. , Keane, A. , Takeda, K. , Gorissen, D. , and Schaik, J. Van , 2011, “ Improving Design Rationale Capture During Embodiment Design,” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Copenhagen, Denmark, Aug. 15–19, pp. 436–445.
Baroni, P. , Romano, M. , Toni, F. , Aurisicchio, M. , and Bertanza, G. , 2013, “ An Argumentation-Based Approach for Automatic Evaluation of Design Debates,” Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 8143, J. Leite , T. C. Son , P. Torroni , L. van der Torre , and W. S., eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 340–356.
Baroni, P. , Romano, M. , Toni, F. , Aurisicchio, M. , and Bertanza, G. , 2015, “ Automatic Evaluation of Design Alternatives With Quantitative Argumentation,” Argument Comput., 6(1), pp. 24–49. [CrossRef]
Clegg, C. , Axtell, C. , Damodaran, L. , Farbey, B. , Hull, R. , Lloyd-Jones, R. , Nicholls, J. , Sell, R. , and Tomlinson, C. , 1997, “ Information Technology: A Study of Performance and the Role of Human and Organizational Factors,” Ergonomics, 40(9), pp. 851–871. [CrossRef]
Dinar, M. , Shah, J. J. , Cagan, J. , Leifer, L. , Linsey, J. , Smith, S. M. , and Hernandez, N. V. , 2015, “ Empirical Studies of Designer Thinking: Past, Present, and Future,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 137(2), p. 21101. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Example of IBIS map implemented in DRed to visualize an engineering design problem [9,10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Mind map using Freemind [38]; Spatial hypertext map in designVUE [39]; Concept map generation process using IHMC CmapTools [24]; Hypermedia diagramming in Compendium [40]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Elements and links in DRed maps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Situation of study within DRM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Requirements management example map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Function analysis diagram example map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Design rationale capture example map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Root cause analysis example map



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In