0
Research Papers: Design Education

Enhancing Engineering Students' Performance on Design Task: The Box of Parts

[+] Author and Article Information
Diana Bairaktarova

Mem. ASME
Department of Engineering Education,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
State University,
635 Prices Fork Road,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: dibairak@vt.edu

William Graziano

Professor
School of Psychological Sciences,
Purdue University,
703 Third Street,
West Lafayette, IN 47907
e-mail: graziano@purdue.edu

Monica Cox

Professor
Department of Engineering Education,
Ohio State University,
2070 Neil Avenue,
Columbus, OH 43210
e-mail: cox.1192@osu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Education Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received January 12, 2016; final manuscript received December 29, 2016; published online March 23, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Gul E. Okudan Kremer.

J. Mech. Des 139(5), 052001 (Mar 23, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1018; doi: 10.1115/1.4036128 History: Received January 12, 2016; Revised December 29, 2016

Most definitions of engineering give machines and mechanical objects a central role. Engineers are makers and users of mechanical objects in their environment. Research supports the notion that interactions with engineered artifacts enhance engineering learning. This study introduces a task simulating a real-world engineering application and uses this task to examine how aptitudes, interests, and direct manipulation of mechanical objects influence performance. We hypothesized that engineering students would generate better assembly instructions when they had the box of component parts (BOP) than when they had the engineering drawing only. We also hypothesized that student's mechanical aptitude (MA) and interests in things each would interact with experimental condition's impact on performance. First-year engineering students (N = 383) created assembly instructions in a mixed experimental and correlational design. A random half was assigned to create instructions with a drawing only, whereas the other half created with both a drawing and a box of component parts present. Assembly instructions were evaluated by professional engineers blind to experimental conditions. They rated instructions from the BOP group as superior to those coming from the control group. Students with greater mechanical aptitude received better evaluations, but there was no evidence the experimental variable was moderated either by mechanical aptitude or by thing orientation (TO). This study suggests that mechanical objects can enhance engineering instruction, especially when they are aligned with professional practice.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Baker, L. R. , 2006, “ On the Twofold Nature of Artefacts,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 37(1), pp. 132–136. [CrossRef]
Houkes, W. , and Meijers, A. , 2006, “ The Ontology of Artefacts: The Hard Problem,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 37(1), pp. 118–131. [CrossRef]
Piaget, J. , 1970, The Child's Conception of Movement, Ballantine Books, New York.
Hammond, L. D. , Austin, K. , Orcutt, S. , and Rosso, J. , 2001, “How People Learn: Introduction to Learning Theories,” Stanford University School of Education, Stanford, CA, p. 11.
Bandura, A. , 1969, “ Social Learning Theory of Identificatory Processes,” Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, D. A. Goslin , ed., Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 216–262.
Vygotsky, L. S. , 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Brophy, J. E. , 2004, Motivating Students to Learn, Routledge, London.
Turkle, S. , 2010, Evocative Objects Things We Think With, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Greeno, J. G. , Collins, A. , and Resnick, L. B. , 1996, “ Cognition and Learning,” Handbook of Educational Psychology, D. C. Berliner , and R. C. Calfee , eds., Macmillan, New York, pp. 15–46.
Skibo, J. M. , and Schiffer, M. B. , 2008, People and Things: A Behavioral Approach to Material Culture, Springer, New York.
Schiffer, M. B. , 1976, Behavioral Archeology, Academic Press, New York.
Gentner, D. , and Stevens, A. L. , eds., 1983, Mental Models, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. , 1983, Mental Models—Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Newell, A. , and Simon, H. A. , 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Cathcart, R. B. , 1998, “ Land Art as Global Warming or Cooling Antidote,” Speculations Sci. Technol., 21(2), pp. 65–72. [CrossRef]
Redish, E. F. , and Smith, K. A. , 2008, “ Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., 97(3), pp. 295–307. [CrossRef]
Vosniadou, S. , and Kyriakopoulou, N. , 2006, “ The Problem of Metaconceptual Awareness in Theory Revision,” 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 26–29, pp. 2329–2334.
Cathcart, D. , and Horseman, T. , 1998, “ A Mathematical Modeling Course for Elementary Education Majors: Instructors' Thoughts,” Journeys of Transformation, Maryland Collaborative for Teacher Preparation, M. Gardner , and D. Ayres , eds., UMCP, Arlington, VA, pp. 71–85.
Johri, A. , and Olds, B. , 2011, “ Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” J. Eng. Educ., 100(1), pp. 151–185. [CrossRef]
Brereton, M. F. , and McGarry, B. , 2000, “ An Observational Study of How Objects Support Engineering Design Thinking and Communication: Implications for the Design of Tangible Media,” SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Hauge, The Netherlands, Apr. 1–6, pp. 217–224.
Simpson, T. W. , Lewis, K. E. , Stone, R. B. , and Regli, W. C. , 2007, “ Using Cyberinfrastructure to Enhance Product Dissection in the Classroom,” Industrial Engineering Research Conference (IERC), Nashville, TN.
Dalrymple, O. , Sears, D. , and Evangelou, D. , 2011, “ The Motivational and Transfer Potential of Disassemble/Analyze/Assemble Activities,” J. Eng. Educ., 100(4), pp. 741–759. [CrossRef]
Grantham, K. , Okudan, G. , Simpson, T. , and Ashour, O. , 2010, “ A Study on Situated Cognition: Product Dissection's Effect on Redesign Activities,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-28334.
McGuire, W. J. , 1983, “ A Contextualist Theory of Knowledge: Its Implications for Innovation and Reform in Psychological Research,” Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 16, pp. 1–47.
McGuire, W. J. , 1999, Constructing Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Crossley, M. J. , Ashby, F. G. , and Maddox, W. T. , 2013, “ Erasing the Engram: The Unlearning of Procedural Skills,” J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen., 142(3), pp. 710–741. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ericsson, K. A. , 2006, “ Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking During Expert Performance on Representative Tasks,” Cambridge Handbook of Expertise & Expert Performance, K. A. Ericsson , N. Charness , P. J. Feltovich , and R. R. Hoffman , eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 223–241.
Ferguson, E. S. , 1993, “ How Engineers Lose Touch,” Invent. Technol., 8(3), pp. 16–24.
Petroski, H. , 1985, “ From Slide Rule to Computer: Forgetting How It Used to Be Done,” To Engineer Is Human, St. Martin's Press, New York, pp. 189–203.
Feisel, L. , and Rosa, A. , 2005, “ The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 121(1), pp. 121–130. [CrossRef]
Campbell, P. B. , Patterson, E. A. , Busch Vishniac, I. , and Kibler, T. , 2008, “ Integrating Applications in the Teaching of Fundamental Concepts,” Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22–25, Paper No. AC 2008-499.
Levy, J. , and Levy, N. , 1999, Arco Mechanical Aptitude and Spatial Relations Tests, Arco Publishing, Lawrenceville, NJ.
Muchinsky, P. , 1993, “ Validation of Intelligence and Mechanical Aptitude Tests in Selecting Employees for Manufacturing Jobs,” J. Bus. Psychol., 7(4), pp. 373–382. [CrossRef]
Wiesen, J. P. , 1997, Technical Manual for the Wiesen Test of Mechanical Aptitude (WTMA), Applied Personnel Research, Newton, MA.
Snow, R. E. , 1992, “ Aptitude Theory: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow,” Educ. Psychol., 27(1), pp. 5–32. [CrossRef]
Hidi, S. , and Renninger, K. A. , 2006, “ The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development,” Educ. Psychol., 41(2), pp. 111–127. [CrossRef]
Huff, J. L. , 2014, “ Psychological Journeys of Engineering Identity From School to Workplace: How Students Become Engineers Among Other Forms of Self,” Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Graziano, W. G. , Habashi, M. M. , and Woodcock, A. , 2011, “ Exploring and Measuring Differences in Person-Thing Orientation,” Pers. Individ. Differ., 51(1), pp. 28–33. [CrossRef]
Woodcock, A. , Graziano, W. G. , Branch, S. E. , Habashi, M. M. , Ngambeki, I. , and Evangelou, D. , 2012, “ Person and Thing Orientations: Psychological Correlates and Predictive Utility,” Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci., 4(1), pp. 116–123. [CrossRef]
Woodcock, A. , Graziano, W. G. , Branch, S. , Ngambeki, I. , and Evangelou, D. , 2012, “ Engineering Students' Beliefs About Research: Sex Differences, Personality and Career Plans,” J. Eng. Educ., 101(3), pp. 495–511. [CrossRef]
Hedges, L. V. , and Nowell, A. , 1995, “ Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High-Scoring Individuals,” Science, 269(5220), pp. 41–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bucciarelli, L. L. , 1988, “ An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design,” Des. Stud., 9(3), pp. 159–169. [CrossRef]
Bechky, B. , 2003, “ Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor,” Organ. Sci., 14(3), pp. 312–330. [CrossRef]
Pahl, G. , and Beitz, W. , 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd ed., K. Wallace , ed., Springer, London.
Juran, J. M. , 2004, Architect of Quality: The Autobiography of Dr. Joseph M. Juran, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Miles, L. , 1989, Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill Text, New York.
Camburn, B. , Dunlap, B. , Gurjar, T. , Hamon, C. , Green, M. , Jensen, D. , Crawford, R. , Otto, K. , and Wood, K. , 2015, “ A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 137(8), p. 081102. [CrossRef]
Jang, J. , and Schunn, C. D. , 2012, “ Physical Design Tools Support and Hinder Innovative Engineering Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(4), p. 041001. [CrossRef]
Hannah, R. , Michaelraj, A. , and Summers, J. D. , 2008, “ A Proposed Taxonomy for Physical Prototypes: Structure and Validation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2008-49976.
Johnson, D. G. , Genco, N. , Saunders, M. N. , Williams, P. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Hölttä-Otto, K. , 2014, “ An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Empathic Experience Design for Innovative Concept Generation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(5), p. 051009. [CrossRef]
Viswanathan, V. K. , and Linsey, J. S. , 2010, “ Physical Models in Idea Generation: Hindrance or Help?,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-28327.
Cohen, J. , 1987, Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
KidWind Org., “ The KidWind Project,” Saint Paul, MN, accessed Dec. 15, 2016, https://www.kidwind.org/products
Qualtrics Survey Software, “ Qualtrics,” Provo, UT, accessed Mar. 19, 2016, https://www.itap.purdue.edu/learning/tools/qualtrics.html
Aiken, L. S. , and West, S. G. , 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, UK.
Brown, P. C. , Roediger, H. L., III , and McDaniel, M. A. , 2014, Make it Stick: The Science of Successful Learning, Belknap, Cambridge, MA.
Roediger, H. L. , and Karpicke, J. D. , 2006, “ Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention,” Psychol. Sci., 17(3), pp. 249–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Soderstrom, N. C. , and Bjork, R. A. , 2013, “ Learning Versus Performance,” Oxford Bibliographies Online: Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Control and experimental groups (mean values)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Thing orientation and condition. Scale:  Y−axis   is  one  of  the  criteria  for  performance  1 to  5; X−axis  is  the  thing  orientation  scale  1 to  5.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mechanical aptitude and condition. Scale:  Y−axis  is  one  of  the  criteria  for  performance  1 to  5;  X−axis  is  the  mechanical  aptitude  score  scale  0 to  54.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In