0
Research Papers: Design Automation

Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Confidence-Based Model Validation for Insufficient Experimental Data

[+] Author and Article Information
Min-Yeong Moon

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
College of Engineering,
The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52242
e-mail: minyeong-moon@uiowa.edu

K. K. Choi

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
College of Engineering,
The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52242
e-mail: kyung-choi@uiowa.edu

Hyunkyoo Cho

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
College of Engineering,
The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, IA 52242
e-mail: hyunkyoo-cho@uiowa.edu

Nicholas Gaul

Mem. ASME
RAMDO Solutions, LLC,
Iowa City, IA 52240
e-mail: nicholas-gaul@ramdosolution.com

David Lamb

U.S. Army RDECOM/TARDEC,
Warren, MI 48397-5000
e-mail: david.lamb@us.army.mil

David Gorsich

U.S. Army RDECOM/TARDEC,
Warren, MI 48397-5000
e-mail: david.j.gorsich.civ@mail.mil

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received August 6, 2016; final manuscript received December 22, 2016; published online January 27, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Nam H. Kim.This work is in part a work of the U.S. Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the U.S. Government's contributions

J. Mech. Des 139(3), 031404 (Jan 27, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1560; doi: 10.1115/1.4035679 History: Received August 06, 2016; Revised December 22, 2016

The conventional reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) methods assume that a simulation model is able to represent the real physics accurately. However, this assumption may not always hold as the simulation model could be biased. Accordingly, designed product based on the conventional RBDO optimum may either not satisfy the target reliability or be overly conservative design. Therefore, simulation model validation using output experimental data, which corrects model bias, should be integrated in the RBDO process. With particular focus on RBDO, the model validation needs to account for the uncertainty induced by insufficient experimental data as well as the inherent variability of the products. In this paper, a confidence-based model validation method that captures the variability and the uncertainty, and that corrects model bias at a user-specified target confidence level, has been developed. The developed model validation helps RBDO to obtain a conservative RBDO optimum design at the target confidence level. The RBDO with model validation may have a convergence issue because the feasible domain changes as the design moves (i.e., a moving-target problem). To resolve the issue, a practical optimization procedure is proposed. Furthermore, the efficiency is achieved by carrying out deterministic design optimization (DDO) and RBDO without model validation, followed by RBDO with confidence-based model validation. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed RBDO approach can achieve a conservative and practical optimum design given a limited number of experimental data.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of output PDFs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Contour of cost function and limit states of biased simulation output G(x) and true output Gtrue(x)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Histogram of confidence-based probabilities of failure among 1000 tests: (a) Constraint G1 and (b) constraint G2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

RBDO optimum using confidence-based model validation for insufficient experimental data

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In