0
Research Papers: Design of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems

Nonlinear Assembly Tolerance Design for Spatial Mechanisms Based on Reliability Methods

[+] Author and Article Information
Yin Yin

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and
Control of Mechanical Structures,
Nanjing University of
Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Nanjing 210016, China
e-mail: yinyinjordan@163.com

Nie Hong

Professor
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and
Control of Mechanical Structures,
Nanjing University of
Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Nanjing 210016, China
e-mail: hnie@nuaa.edu.cn

Feng Fei

China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology,
Beijing 100076, China
e-mail: 114066524@qq.com

Wei Xiaohui

Professor
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and
Control of Mechanical Structures,
Nanjing University of
Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Nanjing 210016, China
e-mail: wei_xiaohui@nuaa.edu.cn

Ni Huajin

China COMAC Shanghai Aircraft Design and
Research Institute,
Shanghai 201210, China
e-mail: nihuajin@comac.cc

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received June 6, 2016; final manuscript received November 21, 2016; published online January 12, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Xiaoping Du.

J. Mech. Des 139(3), 032301 (Jan 12, 2017) (11 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1419; doi: 10.1115/1.4035433 History: Received June 06, 2016; Revised November 21, 2016

Assembly tolerance design for spatial mechanisms is a complex engineering problem that involves a highly nonlinear dimension chain equation and challenges in simplifying the spatial mechanism matrix equation. To address the nonlinearity of the problem and the difficulty of simplifying the dimension chain equation, this paper investigates the use of the Rackwitz–Fiessler (R–F) reliability analysis method and several surrogate model methods, respectively. The tolerance analysis results obtained for a landing gear assembly problem using the R–F method and the surrogate model methods indicate that compared with the extremum method and the probability method, the R–F method allows more accurate and efficient computation of the successful assembly rate, a reasonable tolerance allocation design, and cost reductions of 37% and 16%, respectively. Moreover, the surrogate-model-based computation results show that the support vector machine (SVM) method offers the highest computational accuracy among the three investigated surrogate methods but is more time consuming, whereas the response surface method and the back propagation (BP) neural network method offer relatively low accuracy but higher calculation efficiency. Overall, all of the surrogate model methods provide good computational accuracy while requiring far less time for analysis and computation compared with the simplification of the dimension chain equation or the Monte Carlo method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Tolerance design process for spatial mechanisms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of the method for creating D–H coordinate systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flow chart of assembly tolerance design based on the R–F method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Retracting mechanism for the landing gear

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Kinematic diagram of the landing gear

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Distribution histogram for the upper drag brace, h5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Test prototype of the landing gear: (a) Test prototype I and (b) test prototype II

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Flow chart of assembly tolerance analysis based on surrogate models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Schematic diagram of Bucher sampling design under two-dimensional conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

BP neural network structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Nonlinear mapping from a sample space to a characteristic space

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In