0
Technical Brief

Probabilistic Factor Graph Based Approach for Automatic Material Assignments to Three-Dimensional Objects

[+] Author and Article Information
Binbin Zhang

Manufacturing and Design Lab (MADLab),
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
Buffalo, NY 14260
e-mail: bzhang25@buffalo.edu

Rahul Rai

Manufacturing and Design Lab (MADLab),
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
Buffalo, NY 14260
e-mail: rahulrai@buffalo.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 9, 2015; final manuscript received September 19, 2016; published online October 14, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kristina Shea.

J. Mech. Des 139(1), 014501 (Oct 14, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1635; doi: 10.1115/1.4034838 History: Received September 09, 2015; Revised September 19, 2016

There are strong correlations between material assignment, shape, and functionality of a part in an overall product/assembly. However, these strong correlations are rarely exploited for automated material assignment. We present a probabilistic graphical model to assign materials to the parts (components) of a 3D object (assembly) by identifying the relations between shape, functionality, and material of the parts. By learning the context-dependent correlation with supervision from a set of objects and their segmented parts, the learned model can be used to assign engineering materials to the parts of a query object. Our primary contributions are (a) the engineering materials definition and assignment and (b) assigning engineering materials based on the behavior and form of the parts in the object. The performance of the proposed computational approach is demonstrated by the results of material assignment on various query objects with prespecified engineering performance requirements.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Jain, A. , Thormählen, T. , Ritschel, T. , and Seidel, H.-P. , 2012, “ Material Memex: Automatic Material Suggestions for 3D Objects,” ACM Trans. Graphics, 31(6), pp. 143–150. [CrossRef]
Ullman, D. G. , 1992, The Mechanical Design Process, Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Malisiewicz, T. , and Efros, A. , 2009, “ Beyond Categories: The Visual Memex Model for Reasoning About Object Relationships,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1222–1230.
Kollar, D. , and Friedman, N. , 2009, Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Shilane, P. , Min, P. , Kazhdan, M. , and Funkhouser, T. , 2004, “ The Princeton Shape Benchmark,” Shape Modeling Applications, IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, June 7–9, pp. 167–178.
Gal, R. , and Cohen-Or, D. , 2006, “ Salient Geometric Features for Partial Shape Matching and Similarity,” ACM Trans. Graphics, 25(1), pp. 130–150. [CrossRef]
Chen, D.-Y. , Tian, X.-P. , Shen, Y.-T. , and Ouhyoung, M. , 2003, “ On Visual Similarity Based 3D Model Retrieval,” Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 22, Wiley Online Library, Malden, MA, pp. 223–232.
Ashby, M. F. , and Cebon, D. , 1993, “ Materials Selection in Mechanical Design,” J. Phys. IV, 3(C7), pp. C7–C1.
Parametric Technology Corporation, 2016, “ Creo,” PTC Software, Needham, MA, accessed June 3, 2016, http://www.ptc.com/cad/creo
Mooij, J. M. , and Kappen, H. J. , 2007, “ Sufficient Conditions for Convergence of the Sum–Product Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 53(12), pp. 4422–4437. [CrossRef]
Kschischang, F. R. , Frey, B. J. , and Loeliger, H.-A. , 2001, “ Factor Graphs and the Sum-Product Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 47(2), pp. 498–519. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Automatic material assignment: office chair. (a) Input 3D model with desired behavior and (b) result of our automatic material assignment process based on shape and behavior.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Technical approach overview

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Segmentation and database memex graph examples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Steps for defining the behavior of a database object

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Database object: office chair. (a) Material allocation and the maximum allowable loads on the seat and seat back and (b) Von Mises stress (the yield strength of alloy steel is 6.20422 × 108 N/m2).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Steps for defining the behavior of the query object

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Verification process for the query object

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Query memex graph and factor graph example. (This is an extension of Jain et al. [1]. For the query memex graph, the behavioral similarity edge is added, which takes the behavior aspect of parts into consideration. Correspondingly, in the factor graph, a pairwise factor ψB is included.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The marginal probability values for assigning different materials to chair seat, one-layer house roof, and two-layer house roof

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Eight different query objects

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Material assignment result for objects depicted in Fig. 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Material assignment result on a bicycle model: (a) model without material and (b) result of automatic material assignment

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In