0
Research Papers: Design for Manufacture and the Life Cycle

A Method for Improving the Process and Cost of Nondestructive Disassembly

[+] Author and Article Information
Ile Mircheski

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
University Ss. Cyril and Methodius,
Skopje 1000, Republic of Macedonia
e-mail: ile.mircheski@mf.edu.mk

Remon Pop-Iliev

Mem. ASME
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science,
UOIT-University of Ontario Institute
of Technology,
Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
e-mail: remon.pop-iliev@uoit.ca

Tatjana Kandikjan

Mem. ASME
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
University Ss. Cyril and Methodius,
Skopje 1000, Republic of Macedonia
e-mail: tatjana.kandikjan@mf.edu.mk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design for Manufacturing Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received January 22, 2016; final manuscript received July 29, 2016; published online September 14, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Rikard Söderberg.

J. Mech. Des 138(12), 121701 (Sep 14, 2016) (15 pages) Paper No: MD-16-1065; doi: 10.1115/1.4034469 History: Received January 22, 2016; Revised July 29, 2016

The ever-increasing global environmental concerns demand that strong emphasis be given to the decision-making process pertaining to the strategy of design for nondestructive disassembly during the product evaluation stage. The ultimate objective is to considerably increase the percentage of product components and materials suitable for recycling, recovery, and/or reuse. In this context, this paper proposes a method for improving the nondestructive disassembly of a final product. This method analyzes the nondestructive disassembly by determining a disassembly interference matrix, feasible disassembly sequences, and improved nondestructive disassembly sequences. The innovative element of the nondestructive disassembly method proposed in this paper is integrating the generated conceptual design solutions for a given technical device with a software package developed for determining its improved disassembly sequence embedded within a 3D CAD platform. The developed procedure is based on information obtained from a 3D CAD model of a product, such as geometric constraints, automatic identification of fasteners and components, determination of component-to-component and component-to-fastener connection graphs, and AND/OR logic operations. The goal is for product designers to predict, evaluate, and define improved disassembly sequences while minimizing the cost of disassembly operations as early in the design stage as possible after a CAD model of the product becomes available. The applicability of the integrated method for determining the improved disassembly sequence is presented through an illustrative example.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Gungor, A. , and Gupta, S. M. , 1999, “ Issues in Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing and Product Recovery: A Survey,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 36(4), pp. 811–853. [CrossRef]
Hentschel, C. , 1993, “ The Greening of Products and Production, A New Challenge for Engineers,” APMS '93 Advances in Production Management Systems, IFIP TC5/WG5.7, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 39–46.
European Commission, 2016, “ Life Cycle Thinking and Assessment for Waste Management,” European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, accessed Aug. 6, 2016, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/publications/pdf/Making_Sust_Consumption.pdf
Lambert, A. J. D. , and Gupta, S. M. , 2005, Disassembly Modeling for Assembly, Maintenance, Reuse, and Recycling, CRC Press, New York, pp. 287–336.
Giudice, F. , Guido, L. R. , and Risitano, A. , 2006, Product Design for the Environment—A Life Cycle Approach, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 375–404.
Sodhi, R. , Sonnenberg, and M. , Das, S. , 2004, “ Evaluating the Unfastening Effort in Design for Disassembly and Serviceability,” J. Eng. Des., 15(1), pp. 69–90. [CrossRef]
Xanthopoulos, A. , and Iakovou, E. , 2009, “ On the Optimal Design of the Disassembly and Recovery Processes,” Waste Manage., 29(5), pp. 1702–1711. [CrossRef]
Lambert, A. J. D. , 1997, “ Optimal Disassembly of Complex Products,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 35(9), pp. 2509–2523. [CrossRef]
Lambert, A. J. D. , 2002, “ Determining Optimum Disassembly Sequences in Electronic Equipment,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 43(3), pp. 553–575. [CrossRef]
Lambert, A. J. D. , and Gupta, S. M. , 2008, “ Methods for Optimum and Near Optimum Disassembly Sequencing,” Int. J. Prod. Res, 46(11), pp. 2845–2865. [CrossRef]
Cappelli, F. , Delogu, M. , Pierini, M. , and Schiavone, F. , 2007, “ Design for Disassembly a Methodology for Identifying the Optimal Disassembly Sequence,” J. Eng. Des., 18(6), pp. 563–575. [CrossRef]
Giudice, F. , and Fargione, G. , 2007, “ Disassembly Planning of Mechanical Systems for Service and Recovery a Genetic Algorithms Based Approach,” J. Intell. Manuf., 18(3), pp. 313–329. [CrossRef]
Giudice, F. , 2010, “ Disassembly Depth Distribution for Ease of Service: A Rule-Based Approach,” J. Eng. Des., 21(4), pp. 375–411. [CrossRef]
Rong, L. J. , Wang, Q. , and Hui Huang, P. , 2012, “ An Integrated Disassembly Constraint Generation Approach for Product Design Evaluation,” Int. J. Com. Int., 25(7), pp. 565–577. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y. M. , and Chun, T. H. , 2002, “ Disassembly Matrix for Disassembly Processes of Products,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 40(2), pp. 255–273. [CrossRef]
Hu, D. , Hu, Y. , and Li, C. , 2002, “ Mechanical Product Disassembly Sequence and Path Planning Based on Knowledge and Geometric Reasoning,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 19(9), pp. 688–696. [CrossRef]
Pomares, J. , Puente, S. T. , Torres, F. , Candelas, F. A. , and Gil, P. , 2004, “ Virtual Disassembly of Products Based on Geometric Models,” Comput. Ind., 55(1), pp. 1–14. [CrossRef]
Luis, S. , Homem De Mello , and Sukhan, L. , 2012, Computer-Aided Mechanical Assembly Planning, Springer, New York, pp. 15–39.
Ninaji, B. O. , 2012, Theory of Automatic Robot Assembly and Programming, Springer, New York, pp. 136–149.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flowchart of the proposed I-DIS method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Exploded view and cross-sectional view of the example pump subassembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The contact matrix and diagrams for (a) contacts between components and (b) contacts between components and fasteners in the sample product subassembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

List of disassembly operations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Transition matrix for the presented example

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

List of all feasible disassembly sequences

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

A sample screenshot of the 3D CAD integration performed by the I-DIS method using a VBA macro in solid works to determine the lists of components and fasteners (including their respective materials and weights), contact pairs, and the resulting disassembly interference matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The I-DIS software tool interface when determining the improved disassembly sequences for (a) recycling and (b) product maintenance

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In