Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Design for Sustainable Use of Appliances: A Framework Based on User Behavior Observations

[+] Author and Article Information
Chathura Withanage

SUTD-MIT International Design Centre,
Singapore University of Technology
and Design (SUTD),
Singapore 487372, Singapore
e-mail: chathoo@gmail.com

Katja Hölttä-Otto

Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Aalto University,
Espoo 02150, Finland
e-mail: katja.holtta-otto@aalto.fi

Kevin Otto

Adjunct Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Aalto University,
Espoo 02150, Finland
e-mail: kevin.otto@aalto.fi

Kristin Wood

Professor and Head of the Pillar
Engineering Product Development (EPD) Pillar,
Singapore University of Technology
and Design (SUTD),
Singapore 487372, Singapore
e-mail: kristinwood@sutd.edu.sg

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received October 15, 2015; final manuscript received June 22, 2016; published online August 30, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Mathew I. Campbell.

J. Mech. Des 138(10), 101102 (Aug 30, 2016) (12 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1706; doi: 10.1115/1.4034084 History: Received October 15, 2015; Revised June 22, 2016

User behavior can determine over one third of the energy consumed in the residential energy market. Thus, user behavior has become a primary focus in sustainable mechanical device, appliance, and smart-energy systems design. Wasteful user behaviors, termed energy overuse failure modes (EOFMs), offer an opportunity for design engineers to direct users toward more sustainable behavior through design strategies. There are fundamentally two intervention strategies: (1) product or systems solution led or (2) behavioral led. Both are used to achieve increased sustainable user behavior. To ensure expected intervention outcomes, it is equally important to both identify the EOFMs as well as their underlying causes. However, the prevailing sustainable design approaches, such as design for sustainable behavior (DfSB) and ecodesign, depend on stated responses to elicit underlying causes of behavior. Consequently, the outcomes of these approaches are susceptible to response biases. In this paper, a new revealed behavior based framework is introduced to elicit underlying causes of EOFMs and to propose potential intervention strategies to address them. We focus on uncovering two underlying causes that correspond to the intervention strategies: (1) high energy consuming habits and (2) lack of energy awareness. In the proposed framework, user behavior categorization matrices are formulated using a two-phase user study approach with a request to lower the energy use in-between the phases. Based on the observed behavior, each EOFM is matrix categorized on two axes of change and correctness. With this data, the matrices thereby indicate the dominant underlying causes of EOFMs. The EOFMs and proposed interventions can then be prioritized based on the likelihood of occurrence, severity, magnitude or a combinatorial strategy to suit the sustainability objectives. A case study is presented with seven EOFMs that are found in typical day-to-day household electromechanical appliance use including inefficient appliance setup, inefficient selection, inefficient operation, standby energy consumption, and inefficient settings of conditions. Lack of user awareness of energy and power interactions among appliances and household settings is identified as the key underlying cause of considered EOFMs. Potential design solution strategies are also considered to overcome the EOFMs based on likelihoods, severities, and magnitudes, respectively. Each solution strategy carries a varying level of knowledgeable decision-making required of the user, compared with alternatively designing into the product or systems restrictions on use.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A revealed behavior-based framework for identification and categorization of design opportunities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

User behavior categorization matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Future living lab setup, (b) a participant making cereal, and (c) a participant watching the news

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The experimental procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Tasks to be completed as shown in the cards

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Activity flow diagram with energy/power measurements of EOFMs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Occurrence of energy overconsumption failure modes in regular use (first phase) and when trying to reduce consumption (second phase)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Behavior categorization matrices, severities, likelihoods, and magnitudes




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In