Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Evaluation of System Evolvability Based on Usable Excess

[+] Author and Article Information
Jeffrey D. Allen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: jeffallen@byu.edu

Christopher A. Mattson

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu

Scott M. Ferguson

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
North Carolina State University,
Raleigh, NC 27695
e-mail: scott_ferguson@ncsu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received December 4, 2015; final manuscript received June 10, 2016; published online July 18, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Carolyn Seepersad.

J. Mech. Des 138(9), 091101 (Jul 18, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1798; doi: 10.1115/1.4033989 History: Received December 04, 2015; Revised June 10, 2016

Complex, large-scale engineered systems are an integral part of modern society. The cost of these systems is often high, while their ability to react to emergent requirements can be low. This paper proposes evolvability, based on usable excess, as a possible metric to promote system longevity. An equation for the usability of excess, previously defined only in terms of quantity, is improved to include the attributes of type, location, and form as well as quantity. A methodology for evaluating a system's evolvability is also presented. Using an automated assembly line as an example, we show that system evolvability can be modeled as a function of usable excess.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hansen, T. F. , 2002, “ Is Modularity Necessary for Evolvability? Remarks on the Relationship Between Pleiotropy and Evolvability,” Bio Syst., 69, pp. 83–94.
Skiles, S. M. , Singh, V. , Krager, J. , Seepersad, C. C. , Wood, K. L. , and Jensen, D. , 2006, “ Adapted Concept Generation and Computation Techniques for the Application of a Transformer Design Theory,” ASME Paper No. DETC2006-99584.
Singh, V. , Skiles, S. M. , Krager, J. E. , Wood, K. L. , Jensen, D. , and Sierakowski, R. , 2009, “ Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(8), p. 081010. [CrossRef]
Ross, A. M. , and Hasigns, D. E. , 2006, “ Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2006-7255.
Ferguson, S. , Siddiqi, A. , Lewis, K. , and de Weck, O. , 2007, “ Flexible and Reconfigurable Systems: Nomenclature and Review,” ASME Paper No. DETC2007-35745.
Olewnik, A. , Brauen, T. , Ferguson, S. , and Lewis, K. , 2004, “ A Framework for Flexible Systems and Its Implementation in Multiattribute Decision Making,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 126(3), pp. 412–419. [CrossRef]
Keese, D. A. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Wood, K. L. , 2009, “ Product Flexibility Measurement With Enhanced Change Modes and Effects Analysis (CMEA),” Int. J. Mass Customisation, 3(2), pp. 115–145. [CrossRef]
Saleh, J. H. , and Hastings, D. E. , 2000, “ On Flexibility in Design: Analyzing Flexibility of Space Systems,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2000-5098.
Tilstra, A. H. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Wood, K. L. , 2009, “ Analysis of Product Flexibility for Future Evolution Based on Design Guidelines and a High-Definition Design Structure Matrix,” ASME Paper No. DETC2009-87118.
Siddiqi, A. , and de Weck, O. , 2008, “ Modeling Methods and Conceptual Design Principles for Reconfigurable Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 130, p. 101102.
Haldaman, J. , and Parkinson, M. B. , 2010, “ Reconfigurable Products and Their Means of Reconfiguration,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-28528.
Ferguson, S. M. , and Lewis, K. , 2006, “ Effective Development of Reconfigurable Systems Using Linear State-Feedback Control,” AIAA J., 44(4), pp. 868–878. [CrossRef]
Madni, A. M. , and Epstein, D. J. , 2012, “ Adaptable Platform-Based Engineering: Key Enablers and Outlook for the Future,” Systems Engineering, 15(1), pp. 95–107.
Siddiqi, A. , and de Weck, O. L. , 2009, “ Reconfigurability in Planetary Surface Vehicles,” J. Br. Interplanet. Soc., 64, pp. 589–601.
Keese, D. , Tilstra, A. , Seepersad, C. , and Wood, K. , 2007, “ Empirically-Derived Principles for Designing Products With Flexibility for Future Evolution,” ASME Paper No. DETC2007-35695.
Tilstra, A. H. , Backlund, P. B. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Wood, K. L. , 2008, “ Industrial Case Studies in Product Flexibility for Future Evolution: An Application and Evaluation of Design Guidelines,” ASME Paper No. DETC2008-49370.
Bar-Yam, Y. , 2003, “ When Systems Engineering Fails—Toward Complex Systems Engineering,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 2021–2028.
Rouse, W. B. , 2007, “ Complex Engineered, Organizational and Natural Systems,” Syst. Eng., 10(3), pp. 260–271. [CrossRef]
Simpson, T. W. , and Martins, J. R. R. A. , 2011, “ Multidisciplinary Design Optimization for Complex Engineered Systems: Report From a National Science Foundation Workshop,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(10), p. 101002. [CrossRef]
Bloebaum, C. L. , and McGowan, A.-M. R. , 2012, “ The Design of Large-Scale Complex Engineered Systems: Present Challenges and Future Promise,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2012-5571.
Siddiqi, A. , de Weck, O. L. , Robinson, B. , and Keller, R. , 2011, “ Characterizing the Dynamics of Design Change,” International Conference on Engineering Design.
Summers, J. D. , and Shah, J. J. , 2010, “ Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(2), p. 021004. [CrossRef]
Brown, O. , Long, A. , Shah, N. , Eremenko, P. , and Hamilton, B. A. , 2007, “ System Lifecycle Cost Under Uncertainty as a Design Metric Encompassing the Value of Architectural Flexibility,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2007-6023.
Lewis, K. E. , and Collopy, P. D. , 2012, “ The Role of Engineering Design in Large-Scale Complex Systems,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2012-5573.
Bloebaum, C. L. , Collopy, P. D. , and Hazelrigg, G. A. , 2012, “ NSF/NASA Workshop on the Design of Large-Scale Complex Engineered Systems—From Research to Product Realization,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2012-5572.
Tackett, M. W. P. , Mattson, C. A. , and Ferguson, S. M. , 2014, “ A Model for Quantifying System Evolvability Based on Excess and Capacity,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135, p. 051002. [CrossRef]
Alfaris, A. , Siddiqi, A. , Rizk, C. , and de Weck, O. , 2010, “ Hierarchical Decomposition and Multidomain Formulation for the Design of Complex Sustainable Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(9), p. 091003. [CrossRef]
Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P. , Otto, K. N. , and Baker, J. D. , 2000, “ A Method for Architecting Product Platforms,” Res. Eng. Des., 12(2), pp. 61–72. [CrossRef]
Smaling, R. , and de Weck, O. , 2007, “ Assessing Risks and Opportunities of Technology Infusion in System Design,” Syst. Eng., 10(1), pp. 1–25. [CrossRef]
Sha, Z. , and Panchal, J. H. , 2014, “ Estimating Local Decision-Making Behavior in Complex Evolutionary Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(6), p. 061003. [CrossRef]
Tilstra, A. H. , Seepersad, C. C. , and Wood, K. , 2010, “ The Repeatability of High Definition Design Structure Matrix (HDDSM) Models for Representing Product Architecture,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-28717.
Browning, T. R. , 2001, “ Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 48(3), pp. 292–306. [CrossRef]
Suh, E. S. , Furst, M. R. , Mihalyov, K. J. , and de Weck, O. , 2009, “ Technology Infusion for Complex Systems: A Framework and Case Study,” Syst. Eng., 13, pp. 186–203.
Sandborn, P. A. , Thomas, E. , Herald, J. , Houston, J. , and Houston, J. , 2003, “ Optimum Technology Insertion Into Systems Based on the Assessment of Viability,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., 26(4), pp. 734–738. [CrossRef]
Salis, G. , 2012, “ LEDs Are Making Inroads on Automotive Lighting Systems,” Power Electron. Technol., 38, pp. 8–13.
Silver, M. R. , and de Weck, O. L. , 2007, “ Time-Expanded Decision Networks: A Framework for Designing Evolvable Complex Systems,” Syst. Eng., 10(2), pp. 167–186. [CrossRef]
Messac, A. , 2000, “ From Dubious Construction of Objective Functions to the Application of Physical Programming,” AIAA J., 38(1), pp. 155–163. [CrossRef]
Ramanathan, R. , and Ganesh, L. , 1994, “ Group Preference Aggregation Methods Employed in AHP: An Evaluation and an Intrinsic Process for Deriving Members' Weightages,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 79(2), pp. 249–265. [CrossRef]
Pawson, R. , Wong, G. , and Owen, L. , 2011, “ Known Knowns, Known Unknowns, Unknown Unknowns: The Predicament of Evidence-Based Policy,” Am. J. Eval., 32(4), pp. 518–546.
Hanisch, C. , and Munz, G. , 2008, “ Evolvability and the Intangibles,” Assem. Autom., 28(3), pp. 194–199. [CrossRef]
Ferreira, P. , Lohse, N. , Razon, M. , Larizza, P. , and Triggiani, G. , 2012, “ Skill Based Configuration Methodology for Evolvable Mechatronic Systems,” IECON 2012-38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 4366–4371.
Bryan, A. , Hu, S. J. , and Koren, Y. , 2013, “ Assembly System Reconfiguration Planning,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 135(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Spicer, P. , and Carlo, H. J. , 2007, “ Integrating Reconfiguration Cost Into the Design of Multi-Period Scalable Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129(1), pp. 202–210. [CrossRef]
Hopkins, J. , 1950, “ A Procedure for Quantifying Subjective Appraisals of Odor, Flavor and Texture of Foodstuffs,” Biometrics, 6(1), pp. 1–16. [CrossRef]
Baker, N. , and Freeland, J. , 1975, “ Recent Advances in r&d Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods,” Manage. Sci., 21(10), pp. 1164–1175. [CrossRef]
Kolich, M. , 2008, “ A Conceptual Framework Proposed to Formalize the Scientific Investigation of Automobile Seat Comfort,” Appl. Ergon., 39(1), pp. 15–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Automated assembly station layouts. A = Tray conveyor, B = tray (incoming), C = end effector, D = vertical actuator, E = tray (empty), F = main conveyor, G = pallet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Station timing layout



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In