Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Relationship Between Product Aesthetic Subject Preference and Quantified Gestalt Principles in Automobile Wheel Rims

[+] Author and Article Information
José E. Lugo

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Puerto Rico - Mayagüez Campus,
Mayagüez, PR 00681
e-mail: jose.lugo2@upr.edu

James P. Schmiedeler

Department of Aerospace and
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: schmiedeler.4@nd.edu

Stephen M. Batill

Department of Aerospace and
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: batill@nd.edu

Laura Carlson

Department of Psychology,
University of Notre Dame,
Notre Dame, IN 46556
e-mail: lcarlson@nd.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 24, 2015; final manuscript received February 10, 2016; published online March 17, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kristina Shea.

J. Mech. Des 138(5), 051101 (Mar 17, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1667; doi: 10.1115/1.4032775 History: Received September 24, 2015; Revised February 10, 2016

Birkhoff proposed that order divided by complexity is a formula for esthetic measurement. In that context, this work proposes to measure order with a method to quantify Gestalt principles in 2D product representations. These principles establish how humans visually group elements of a shape together, and they have been used in architecture, product design and art as guidelines for a good design. A human subject study was conducted to test the hypothesis that if complexity is held constant across different versions of the same basic concept, Gestalt can serve as a direct measurement of the relative esthetics of those candidate designs. In a survey, subjects were asked to evaluate their preferences for multiple individual 2D representations of automotive wheel rims from a variety of styles. The wheel rims within each style were designed in pairs, one pair with lower and one pair with higher Gestalt. Complexity was held constant by only comparing subject ratings within wheel rim styles. The results show that a positive change in Gestalt has a positive effect on aesthetic subject preference and that preferences are not significantly different for designs differing in geometry but having the same Gestalt. The implications of these results for designers and for future work are discussed.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Design , Wheels , Preferences
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Nagamachi, M. , 2010, Kansei/Affective Engineering, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Lehrer, J. , 2010, How We Decide, 1 reprint ed., Mariner Books, New York.
Moon, P. , and Spencer, D. E. , 1944, “ Aesthetic Measure Applied to Color Harmony,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 34(4), pp. 234–242. [CrossRef]
Hsiao, S.-W. , Chiu, F.-Y. , and Chen, C. S. , 2008, “ Applying Aesthetics Measurement to Product Design,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 38(1112), pp. 910–920. [CrossRef]
Orsborn, S. , Cagan, J. , and Boatwright, P. , 2009, “ Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(6), p. 061001. [CrossRef]
Sofiane Achiche, S. A.-K. , 2011, “ Genetic Fuzzy Modeling of User Perception of Three-Dimensional Shapes,” AI EDAM, 25(1), pp. 93–107.
Reid, T. N. , Gonzalez, R. D. , and Papalambros, P. Y. , 2010, “ Quantification of Perceived Environmental Friendliness for Vehicle Silhouette Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(10), p. 101010. [CrossRef]
Tseng, I. , Kotovsky, K. , and Cagan, J. , 2012, “ Concurrent Optimization of Computationally Learned Stylistic Form and Functional Goals,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(11), p. 111006. [CrossRef]
Sylcott, B. , Cagan, J. , and Tabibnia, G. , 2013, “ Understanding Consumer Tradeoffs Between Form and Function Through Metaconjoint and Cognitive Neuroscience Analyses,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(10), p. 101002. [CrossRef]
Breemen, E. J. J. V. , Horvth, I. , Knoop, W. G. , Vergeest, J. S. M. , and Pham, B. , 1998, “ Developing a Methodology for Design for Aesthetics Based on Analogy of Communication,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference.
Schütte, S. , 2005, “ Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design: Kansei Engineering in Development,” Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University, Machine Design, The Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden.
Yanagisawa, H. , and Fukuda, S. , 2005, “ Interactive Reduct Evolutional Computation for Aesthetic Design,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 5(1), pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Birkhoff, G. D. , 1933, Aesthetic Measure, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Wertheimer, M. , 1923, “ Untersuchungen zur lehre von der gestalt,” Psycol. Forsch., 2(4), pp. 301–350. [CrossRef]
Norman, D. , 2005, Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, 1st ed., Basic Books, New York.
Lauer, D. , and Pentak, S. , 2011, Design Basics, 8th ed., Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
Lugo, J. , Batill, S. , and Carlson, L. , 2012, “ Modeling Product Form Preference Using Gestalt Principles, Semantic Space, and Kansei,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-70434, pp. 529–539.
Lugo, J. E. , Schmiedeler, J. P. , Batill, S. M. , and Carlson, L. , 2015, “ Quantification of Classical Gestalt Principles in Two-Dimensional Product Representations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 137(9), p. 094502. [CrossRef]
Wertheimer, M. , and Ellis, W. D. , 1938, “ Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms,” A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York, pp. 71–88.
Koffka, K. , 1935, Principles of Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt Brace and Co., Rahway, NJ.
Sarkar, S. , and Boyer, K. , 1994, “ A Computational Structure for Preattentive Perceptual Organization: Graphical Enumeration and Voting Methods,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 24(2), pp. 246–267. [CrossRef]
Ching, F. , 1995, A Visual Dictionary of Architecture, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Palmer, S. E. , 1999, Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Orsborn, S. , Boatwright, P. , and Cagan, J. , 2007, “ Identifying Product Shape Relationships Using Principal Component Analysis,” Res. Eng. Des., 18(4), pp. 163–180. [CrossRef]
Kovcs, I. , and Julesz, B. , 1993, “ A Closed Curve is Much More Than an Incomplete One: Effect of Closure in Figure-Ground Segmentation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90(16), pp. 7495–7497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zwickel, T. , Wachtler, T. , and Eckhorn, R. , 2007, “ Coding the Presence of Visual Objects in a Recurrent Neural Network of Visual Cortex,” Biosystems, 89(13), pp. 216–226. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wörgötter, F. , Krger, N. , Pugeault, N. , Calow, D. , Lappe, M. , Pauwels, K. , Van Hulle, M. , Tan, S. , and Johnston, A. , 2004, “ Early Cognitive Vision: Using Gestalt-Laws for Task-Dependent, Active Image-Processing,” Nat. Comput., 3(3), pp. 293–321. [CrossRef]
Elder, J. , and Zucker, S. , 1993, “ The Effect of Contour Closure on the Rapid Discrimination of Two-Dimensional Shapes,” Vision Res., 33(7), pp. 981–991. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Veryzer, R. W. , and Hutchinson, J. W. , 1998, “ The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs,” J. Consum. Res., 24(4), pp. 374–385. [CrossRef]
Hsiao, S.-W. , and Chou, J.-R. , 2006, “ A Gestalt-Like Perceptual Measure for Home Page Design Using a Fuzzy Entropy Approach,” Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 64(2), pp. 137–156. [CrossRef]
Aesthetics, 2013, “ Merriam-Webster,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aesthetics
Davis, R. C. , 1936, “ An Evaluation and Test of birkhoff's Aesthetic Measure Formula,” J. Gen. Psychol., 15(2), pp. 231–240.
Rigau, J. , Feixas, M. , and Sbert, M. , 2007, “ Conceptualizing Birkhoff's Aesthetic Measure Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity,” Proceedings of the Third Eurographics Conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, Computational Aesthetics'07, Eurographics Association, Banff, Alberta, Canada, Jun. 20–22, pp. 105–112.
Yao, L. , Suryanarayan, P. , Qiao, M. , Wang, J. Z. , and Li, J. , 2012, “ OSCAR: On-Site Composition and Aesthetics Feedback Through Exemplars for Photographers,” Int. J. Comput. Vision, 96(3), pp. 353–383. [CrossRef]
Datta, R. , Joshi, D. , Li, J. , and Wang, J. Z. , 2006, “ Studying Aesthetics in Photographic Images Using a Computational Approach,” Computer Vision ECCV 2006, A. Leonardis , H. Bischof , and A. Pinz , eds., No. 3953 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, pp. 288–301.
Wong, L.-K. , and Low, K.-L. , 2009, “ Saliency-Enhanced Image Aesthetics Class Prediction,” 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 997–1000.
Wu, Y. , Bauckhage, C. , and Thurau, C. , 2010, “ The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Predicting Aesthetic Image Labels,” 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 1586–1589.
Orendovici, R. , and Wang, J. Z. , 2010, “ Training Data Collection System for a Learning-Based Photographic Aesthetic Quality Inference Engine,” Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, ACM, Firenze, Italy, Oct. 25–29, pp. 1575–1578.
Schmidhuber, J. , 1997, “ Low-Complexity Art,” Leonardo, 30(2), pp. 97–103. [CrossRef]
Schmidhuber, J. , 2007, “ Simple Algorithmic Principles of Discovery, Subjective Beauty, Selective Attention, Curiosity and Creativity,” Discovery Science, V. Corruble , M. Takeda , and E. Suzuki , eds., Springer, Berlin, pp. 26–38. [PubMed] [PubMed]
Sylcott, B. , Michalek, J. J. , and Cagan, J. , 2013, “ Towards Understanding the Role of Interaction Effects in Visual Conjoint Analysis,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-12622, p. V03AT03A012.
Paolacci, G. , Chandler, J. , and Ipeirotis, P. , 2010, “ Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk,” Judgment Decis. Making, 5(5), pp. 411–419.
Buhrmester, M. , Kwang, T. , and Gosling, S. D. , 2011, “ Amazon's Mechanical Turk a New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 6(1), pp. 3–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mason, W. , and Suri, S. , 2012, “ Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk,” Behav. Res. Methods, 44(1), pp. 1–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horton, J. J. , and Chilton, L. B. , 2010, “ The Labor Economics of Paid Crowdsourcing,” Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, (EC), ACM, Cambridge, MA, Jun. 7–11, p. 209218.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of individual Gestalt principles: (a) no grouping, (b) proximity, (c) similarity, (d) symmetry, (e) parallelism, (f) continuity, and (g) closure. Adapted from Ref. [23].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Photographs of four wheel rim styles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

2D representations of the wheel rim styles in Figs.2(a)2(d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Atomistic elements of the wheel rim styles in Fig. 2(a) through Fig. 2(d) (numbered circles indicate locations of continuity quantification)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Y-spoke style Gestalt principles: (a) angular proximity and (b) parallelism




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In