0
Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

An Evaluation Methodology for Design Concept Communication Using Digital Prototypes

[+] Author and Article Information
Soheil Arastehfar

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
9 Engineering Drive 1,
Singapore 117575
e-mail: soheil@u.nus.edu

Ying Liu

Mem. ASME
Institute of Mechanical
and Manufacturing Engineering,
School of Engineering,
Cardiff University,
Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
e-mail: Liuy81@cardiff.ac.uk

Wen Feng Lu

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
9 Engineering Drive 1,
Singapore 117575
e-mail: mpelwf@nus.edu.sg

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received April 28, 2015; final manuscript received December 15, 2015; published online February 1, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kristina Shea.

J. Mech. Des 138(3), 031103 (Feb 01, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1330; doi: 10.1115/1.4032396 History: Received April 28, 2015; Revised December 15, 2015

Digital prototypes (DPs) allow designers to communicate design concepts to users by rendering physical characteristics of the concepts. To enhance user understanding of the concepts, it is important that the users be able to make better estimates of the values of the characteristics. Correctness of the estimates can depend on two crucial factors: the ability of DPs to render the physical characteristics and the way the DPs are used to communicate the physical characteristics. However, little attention has been paid to the latter. A DP can be used in different ways, e.g., it can be projected on different backgrounds, or be manipulated using different input/output devices. Hence, it is important to identify an effective way of using DPs, via an assessment of the effectiveness of various ways. This paper introduces a methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of communication of physical characteristics to users using DPs. The methodology is used to assess the degree to which users can correctly and quickly estimate the values of the characteristics through interactions with DPs. Such assessments are then analyzed with statistical methods and hypothesis tests to reveal the effectiveness. To validate the proposed methodology, the size of hand-held electronic consumer products, such as smartphones, is considered in a case study. In the study, the effectiveness of two communication setups is evaluated. The same DP is used in both setups, while the environments and input devices are different. The experimental results show that the evaluated effectiveness can reflect how successful the setups are, and can help select the best way of using the DP, i.e., by providing a better environment, a better input device, or a combination of both.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Henderson, M. R. , 1993, “ Representing Functionality and Design Intent in Product Models,” Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications (SMA '93), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, ACM, New York, pp. 387–396.
Desmet, P. M. , and Hekkert, P. , 2007, “ Framework of Product Experience,” Int. J. Des., 1(1), pp. 57–66.
Maier, A. M. , 2007, “ A Grid-Based Assessment Method of Communication in Engineering Design,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Crilly, N. , Maier, A. M. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2008, “ Representing Artefacts as Media: Modelling the Relationship Between Designer Intent and Consumer Experience,” Int. J. Des., 2(3), pp. 15–27.
Maier, A. M. , and Kleinsmann, M. , 2013, “ Studying and Supporting Design Communication,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf., 27(02), pp. 87–90. [CrossRef]
Agost, M.-J. , and Vergara, M. , 2014, “ Relationship Between Meanings, Emotions, Product Preferences and Personal Values. Application to Ceramic Tile Floorings,” Appl. Ergon., 45(4), pp. 1076–1086. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Arastehfar, S. , Liu, Y. , and Lu, W. F. , “ On Design Concept Validation Through Prototyping: Challenges and Opportunities,” 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Seoul Korea, Aug. 19–22, Design for Harmonies, Vol. 6: Design Information and Knowledge, U. Lindemann , S. V, Yong Se Kim , S. W. Lee , J. Clarkson , and G. Cascini , eds., The Design Society, Paper No. DS 75-6.
Poirson, E. , Petiot, J.-F. , Boivin, L. , and Blumenthal, D. , 2013, “ Eliciting User Perceptions Using Assessment Tests Based on an Interactive Genetic Algorithm,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(3), pp. 031004–031020. [CrossRef]
Artacho, M. A. , Ballester, A. , and Alcántara, E. , 2009, “ Analysis of the Impact of Slight Changes in Product Formal Attributes on User's Emotions and Configuration of an Emotional Space for Successful Design,” J. Eng. Des., 21(6), pp. 693–705. [CrossRef]
Reid, T. N. , MacDonald, E. F. , and Du, P. , 2013, “ Impact of Product Design Representation on Customer Judgment,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(9), pp. 091008–091020. [CrossRef]
Crilly, N. , Moultrie, J. , and Clarkson, P. J. , 2004, “ Seeing Things: Consumer Response to the Visual Domain in Product Design,” Des. Stud., 25(6), pp. 547–577. [CrossRef]
Arastehfar, S. , Liu, Y. , and Lu, W. F. , 2014, “ A Framework for Concept Validation in Product Design Using Digital Prototyping,” J. Ind. Prod. Eng., 31(5), pp. 286–302.
Sylcott, B. , Cagan, J. , and Tabibnia, G. , 2013, “ Understanding Consumer Tradeoffs Between Form and Function Through Metaconjoint and Cognitive Neuroscience Analyses,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(10), p. 101002. [CrossRef]
Maropoulos, P. G. , and Ceglarek, D. , 2010, “ Design Verification and Validation in Product Lifecycle,” CIRP Ann.–Manuf. Technol., 59(2), pp. 740–759. [CrossRef]
Gironimo, G. D. , Lanzotti, A. , and Vanacore, A. , 2006, “ Concept Design for Quality in Virtual Environment,” Comput. Graph., 30(6), pp. 1011–1019. [CrossRef]
Şahin, A. , Bøe, M. , Terpenny, J. , and Bøhn, J. H. , 2007, “ A Study to Understand Perceptual Discrepancies Using Visual Illusions and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA),” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(7), pp. 744–752. [CrossRef]
Arastehfar, S. , 2015, “ A Framework for Concept Validation in Design Using Digital Prototyping,” Doctor of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Virzi, R. A. , Sokolov, J. L. , and Karis, D. , 1996, “ Usability Problem Identification Using Both Low-and High-Fidelity Prototypes,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, Apr. 13–18, ACM, New York, pp. 236–243.
Thomke, S. H. , 1997, “ The Role of Flexibility in the Development of New Products: An Empirical Study,” Res. Policy, 26(1), pp. 105–119. [CrossRef]
Sauer, J. , and Sonderegger, A. , 2009, “ The Influence of Prototype Fidelity and Aesthetics of Design in Usability Tests: Effects on User Behaviour, Subjective Evaluation and Emotion,” Appl. Ergon., 40(4), pp. 670–677. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, Q. , Vonderembse, M. A. , and Cao, M. , 2009, “ Product Concept and Prototype Flexibility in Manufacturing: Implications for Customer Satisfaction,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 194(1), pp. 143–154. [CrossRef]
Barbieri, L. , Angilica, A. , Bruno, F. , and Muzzupappa, M. , 2013, “ Mixed Prototyping With Configurable Physical Archetype for Usability Evaluation of Product Interfaces,” Comput. Ind., 64(3), pp. 310–323. [CrossRef]
Tovares, N. , Boatwright, P. , and Cagan, J. , 2014, “ Experiential Conjoint Analysis: An Experience-Based Method for Eliciting, Capturing, and Modeling Consumer Preference,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(10), pp. 101404–101416. [CrossRef]
Kim, D. B. , and Lee, K. H. , 2011, “ Computer-Aided Appearance Design Based on BRDF Measurements,” Comput.-Aided Des., 43(9), pp. 1181–1193. [CrossRef]
Artacho-Ramirez, M. , Diego-Mas, J. , and Alcaide-Marzal, J. , 2008, “ Influence of the Mode of Graphical Representation on the Perception of Product Aesthetic and Emotional Features: An Exploratory Study,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 38(11), pp. 942–952. [CrossRef]
Park, H. , Son, J.-S. , and Lee, K.-H. , 2008, “ Design Evaluation of Digital Consumer Products Using Virtual Reality-Based Functional Behaviour Simulation,” J. Eng. Des., 19(4), pp. 359–375. [CrossRef]
Gyi, D. , Cain, R. , and Campbell, I. , 2009, “ The Value of Computer-Based Product Representations in Co-Designing With Older Users,” J. Eng. Des., 21(2–3), pp. 305–313.
Söderman, M. , 2005, “ Virtual Reality in Product Evaluations With Potential Customers: An Exploratory Study Comparing Virtual Reality With Conventional Product Representations,” J. Eng. Des., 16(3), pp. 311–328. [CrossRef]
Iansiti, M. , and MacCormack, A. , 1996, “ Developing Products on Internet Time,” Harv. Bus. Rev., 75(5), pp. 108–117.
Eisenhardt, K. M. , and Tabrizi, B. N. , 1995, “ Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry,” Administrative Sci. Q., 40(1), pp. 84–110. [CrossRef]
Takala, R. , 2005, “ Product Demonstrator: A System for Up-Front Testing of User-Related Product Features,” J. Eng. Des., 16(3), pp. 329–336. [CrossRef]
Ford, D. N. , and Sobek, D. K. , 2005, “ Adapting Real Options to New Product Development by Modeling the Second Toyota Paradox,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 52(2), pp. 175–185. [CrossRef]
Ren, Y. , and Papalambros, P. Y. , 2011, “ A Design Preference Elicitation Query as an Optimization Process,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(11), pp. 111004–111013. [CrossRef]
Gonzales, R. C. , and Woods, R. , 2002, Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. [PubMed] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

An example of V for color, (a) values and (b) their d

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

An example of evaluation of communication of color by using the methodology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

How to enhance DP vs. how to use DP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The graphical illustration of Tr

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The timing of the experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Screenshots of user–DP interactions in COM-M

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The effectiveness, (a) COM-V and (b) COM-M

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In