0
Research Papers: Design of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems

Performing Nonsingular Transitions Between Assembly Modes in Analytic Parallel Manipulators by Enclosing Quadruple Solutions

[+] Author and Article Information
Adrián Peidró

Systems Engineering
and Automation Department,
Miguel Hernández University,
Elche 03202, Spain
e-mail: apeidro@umh.es

José María Marín

Department of Mechanical Engineering
and Energy,
Miguel Hernández University,
Elche 03202, Spain
e-mail: jmarin@umh.es

Arturo Gil

Systems Engineering
and Automation Department,
Miguel Hernández University,
Elche 03202, Spain
e-mail: arturo.gil@umh.es

Óscar Reinoso

Systems Engineering
and Automation Department,
Miguel Hernández University,
Elche 03202, Spain
e-mail: o.reinoso@umh.es

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 4, 2015; final manuscript received August 25, 2015; published online October 15, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Charles Kim.

J. Mech. Des 137(12), 122302 (Oct 15, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1070; doi: 10.1115/1.4031653 History: Received February 04, 2015; Revised August 25, 2015

This paper analyzes the multiplicity of the solutions to forward kinematics of two classes of analytic robots: 2RPR-PR robots with a passive leg and 3-RPR robots with nonsimilar flat platform and base. Since their characteristic polynomials cannot have more than two valid roots, one may think that triple solutions, and hence nonsingular transitions between different assembly modes, are impossible for them. However, the authors show that the forward kinematic problems of these robots always admit quadruple solutions and obtain analytically the loci of points of the joint space where these solutions occur. Then, it is shown that performing trajectories in the joint space that enclose these points can produce nonsingular transitions, demonstrating that it is possible to design simple analytic parallel robots with two and three degrees-of-freedom (DOF) and the ability to execute these transitions.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Macho, E. , Altuzarra, O. , Petuya, V. , and Hernández, A. , 2009, “ Workspace Enlargement Merging Assembly Modes. Application to the 3-RRR Planar Platform,” Int. J. Mech. Control, 10(1), pp. 13–20.
Innocenti, C. , and Parenti-Castelli, V. , 1998, “ Singularity-Free Evolution From One Configuration to Another in Serial and Fully-Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120(1), pp. 73–79. [CrossRef]
McAree, P. , and Daniel, R. , 1999, “ An Explanation of Never-Special Assembly Changing Motions for 3–3 Parallel Manipulators,” Int. J. Rob. Res., 18(6), pp. 556–574. [CrossRef]
Zein, M. , Wenger, P. , and Chablat, D. , 2008, “ Non-Singular Assembly-Mode Changing Motions for 3-RPR Parallel Manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 43(4), pp. 480–490. [CrossRef]
Urízar, M. , Petuya, V. , Altuzarra, O. , and Hernández, A. , 2010, “ Researching Into Non-Singular Transitions in the Joint Space,” Advances in Robot Kinematics: Motion in Man and Machine, J. Lenarcic , and M. M. Stanisic , eds., Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 45–52.
Zein, M. , Wenger, P. , and Chablat, D. , 2007, “ Singular Curves in the Joint Space and Cusp Points of 3-RPR Parallel Manipulators,” Robotica, 25(6), pp. 717–724. [CrossRef]
Moroz, G. , Rouiller, F. , Chablat, D. , and Wenger, P. , 2010, “ On the Determination of Cusp Points of 3-RPR Parallel Manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 45(11), pp. 1555–1567. [CrossRef]
Coste, M. , 2012, “ Asymptotic Singularities of Planar Parallel 3-RPR Manipulators,” Latest Advances in Robot Kinematics, J. Lenarcic , and M. Husty , eds., Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 35–42.
Coste, M. , 2012, “ A Simple Proof That Generic 3-RPR Manipulators Have Two Aspects,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 4(1), p. 011008. [CrossRef]
Husty, M. , Schadlbauer, J. , Caro, S. , and Wenger, P. , 2014, “ The 3-RPS Manipulator Can Have Non-Singular Assembly-Mode Changes,” Computational Kinematics (Mechanisms and Machine Science), Vol. 15, F. Thomas , and A. Pérez Gracia , eds., Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 339–348.
Caro, S. , Wenger, P. , and Chablat, D. , 2012, “ Non-Singular Assembly Mode Changing Trajectories of a 6-DOF Parallel Robot,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-70662.
DallaLibera, F. , and Ishiguro, H. , 2014, “ Non-Singular Transitions Between Assembly Modes of 2-DOF Planar Parallel Manipulators With a Passive Leg,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 77, pp. 182–197. [CrossRef]
Bamberger, H. , Wolf, A. , and Shoham, M. , 2008, “ Assembly Mode Changing in Parallel Mechanisms,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 24(4), pp. 765–772. [CrossRef]
Macho, E. , Altuzarra, O. , Pinto, C. , and Hernández, A. , 2008, “ Transitions Between Multiple Solutions of the Direct Kinematic Problem,” Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Design, J. Lenarcic , and P. Wenger , eds., Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 301–310.
Coste, M. , Chablat, D. , and Wenger, P. , 2014, “ Nonsingular Change of Assembly Mode Without Any Cusp,” Advances in Robot Kinematics, J. Lenarcic , and O. Khatib , eds., Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 105–112.
Kong, X. , and Gosselin, C. M. , 2002, “ Generation and Forward Displacement Analysis of RPR-PR-RPR Analytic Planar Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(2), pp. 294–300. [CrossRef]
Hernández, A. , Altuzarra, O. , Petuya, V. , and Macho, E. , 2009, “ Defining Conditions for Nonsingular Transitions Between Assembly Modes,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 25(6), pp. 1438–1447. [CrossRef]
Chablat, D. , Moroz, G. , and Wenger, P. , 2011, “ Uniqueness Domains and Non Singular Assembly Mode Changing Trajectories,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9–13, pp. 3946–3951.
Moroz, G. , Chablat, D. , Wenger, P. , and Rouiller, F. , 2010, “ Cusp Points in the Parameter Space of RPR-2PRR Parallel Manipulators,” New Trends in Mechanism Science (Mechanisms and Machine Science), Vol. 5, D. Pisla , M. Ceccarelli , M. Husty , and B. Corves , eds., Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 29–37.
Kong, X. , and Gosselin, C. M. , 2001, “ Forward Displacement Analysis of Third-Class Analytic 3-RPR Planar Parallel Manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 36(9), pp. 1009–1018. [CrossRef]
Gosselin, C. M. , and Merlet, J. P. , 1994, “ The Direct Kinematics of Planar Parallel Manipulators: Special Architectures and Number of Solutions,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 29(8), pp. 1083–1097. [CrossRef]
Wenger, P. , Chablat, D. , and Zein, M. , 2006, “ Degeneracy Study of the Forward Kinematics of Planar 3-RPR Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(12), pp. 1265–1268. [CrossRef]
Urízar, M. , Petuya, V. , Altuzarra, O. , and Hernández, A. , 2012, “ Assembly Mode Changing in the Cuspidal Analytic 3-RPR,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 28(2), pp. 506–513. [CrossRef]
Brown, J. W. , and Churchill, R. V. , 2004, Complex Variables and Applications, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Srinivasan, V. , 2003, Theory of Dimensioning: An Introduction to Parameterizing Geometric Models, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Manubens, M. , Moroz, G. , Chablat, D. , Wenger, P. , and Rouillier, F. , 2012, “ Cusp Points in the Parameter Space of Degenerate 3-RPR Planar Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Rob., 4(4), p. 041003. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

An analytic 2RPR-PR parallel robot

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Zeros of P(ψ) in (−1, 1) with different multiplicities: (a) simple zero, (b) double zero (singularity), and (c) triple zero (cusp point)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Simple (left) and double (right) zeros of P(ψ) at ψ = −1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Joint space of an analytic 2RPR-PR robot, without cusps or α-curves. (b) Polar plots of the evolution of the six solutions σi (i = 1,…,6) to forward kinematics along the circular trajectory abcdefgha of the joint space.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Rectangular (left) and polar (right) representations of ϕ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Polar plots of the solutions to forward kinematics when approaching the point λπ along tπ (left). Solutions at λπ (right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Polar plots of the solutions to forward kinematics when approaching the point λ0 along t0 (left). Real quadruple solution at λ0 (right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Trajectory of the solution σ4 in the reduced configuration space

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Configuration of the analytic 2RPR-PR robot for the solution σ4 along the circular trajectory abcdefgha of Fig. 4(a)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The analytic 3-RPR robot with flat base and platform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Joint space of the analytic 3-RPR robot, with the singularity locus and the γ-curves. Dotted lines indicate lines hidden by the singularity surface. (b) Polar diagrams with the evolution of the six solutions σi (i = 1,…,6) to forward kinematics along the trajectory t0 that encircles the curve γ0−.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Evolution of the configuration of the 3-RPR robot for the solution σ1 along the nonsingular assembly mode changing trajectory t0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) Slice of the joint space of Fig. 11(a) at ρ2 = 1. (b) Polar plots with the evolution of the six solutions σi (i = 1,…,6) to forward kinematics along the circle centered at d, shown in Fig. 13(a).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Trajectory of the solution σ1 in the reduced configuration space of the 3-RPR robot, for the trajectory of Eq. (48) and ρ2 = 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Trajectory of the solution σ1 in the output space of the 3-RPR robot, for the trajectory of Eq. (48) and ρ2 = 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Conics C1 (continuous line) and C2 (dashed line) for different values of 0 < ψ < 1. For ψ = 0.999, C1 and C2 almost intersect, as shown in the zoomed areas.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In