Research Papers: Design Automation

A Methodology for Modular and Changeable Design Architecture and Application in Automotive Framing Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Hoda ElMaraghy

Intelligent Manufacturing Systems Centre,
University of Windsor,
Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada

Tarek AlGeddawy

Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
University of Minnesota Duluth,
Duluth, MN 55812

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received January 16, 2015; final manuscript received August 24, 2015; published online October 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Harrison M. Kim.

J. Mech. Des 137(12), 121403 (Oct 16, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1028; doi: 10.1115/1.4031549 History: Received January 16, 2015; Revised August 24, 2015

This paper presents a design methodology to modularize integrated fixtures, such as automotive framing systems, to be quickly and cost effectively reconfigured to accommodate a variety of products. Automotive assembly framing systems are used to accurately position and spot-weld the loosely pre-assembled body-in-white (BIW) car body parts. Auto-assembly systems can handle many car body styles; however, the used model-specific BIW framing systems are large, expensive, and the changeover to accommodate different car models takes considerable time. The proposed modularization design methodology aggregates a set of design structure matrices (DSMs) to represent the required changes in the fixtures, the spatial relationships between the used tools and fixtures, and the flow of exchanged information between them. The best granularity level of the modular fixture design architecture is determined using “Cladistics”: a hierarchical biological classification tool. Different tools within the framing system are combined into switchable modules, which allows these integrated systems to be easily reconfigured between different car body styles (product variants). A case study involving four car body styles is used for illustrating the presented design methodology. Results show the validity of the proposed methodology and demonstrate the obtained design of new modular automotive BIW framing system and the methods used for postprocessing and redesigning to improve the framing system's changeability.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cladistics analysis of a group of work-pieces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Modules of a commonly used automotive framing system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Frame structure: (a) a picture of a typical automotive framing system showing the three rows of positioning tools, (b) a schematic of a typical integrated dedicated frame for a specific automotive body style, and (c) tool relative locations in a frame layout

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The difference between tool variants (a), module variants (b), and different modules (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Frame tool changes between the four car body styles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The three different domains DSMs and the aggregated DSM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The optimum frame granularity cladogram showing the modular architecture at each granularity level

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Module change map and change cost

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The modular solution steps. (a) The new modular design of the four car BIW framing system. (b) The framing system with reduced modules after postprocessing. (c) The car BIW final framing system after redesign Improvements.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In