Research Papers: Design Automation

Analyzing the Tradeoffs Between Economies of Scale, Time-Value of Money, and Flexibility in Design Under Uncertainty: Study of Centralized Versus Decentralized Waste-to-Energy Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Michel-Alexandre Cardin

Department of Industrial and
Systems Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
Block E1A, #06-25,
1 Engineering Drive 2,
Singapore 117576, Singapore
e-mail: macardin@nus.edu.sg

Junfei Hu

Department of Industrial and
Systems Engineering,
National University of Singapore,
Block E1A, #06-25,
1 Engineering Drive 2,
Singapore 117576, Singapore

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received April 19, 2015; final manuscript received August 16, 2015; published online November 4, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Harrison M. Kim.

J. Mech. Des 138(1), 011401 (Nov 04, 2015) Paper No: MD-15-1298; doi: 10.1115/1.4031422 History: Received April 19, 2015; Revised August 16, 2015

This paper presents and applies a simulation-based methodology to assess the value of flexible decentralized engineering systems design (i.e., the ability to flexibly expand the capacity in multiple sites over time and space) under uncertainty. This work differs from others by analyzing explicitly the tradeoffs between economies of scale (EoS)—which favors designing large capacity upfront to reduce unit cost and accommodate high anticipated demand—and the time value of money—which favors deferring capacity investments to the future and deploying smaller modules to reduce unit cost. The study aims to identify the best strategies to design and deploy the capacity of complex engineered systems over time and improve their economic lifecycle performance in the face of uncertainty by exploiting the idea of flexibility. This study is illustrated using a waste-to-energy (WTE) system operated in Singapore. The results show that a decentralized design with the real option to expand the capacity in different locations and times improves the expected net present value (ENPV) by more than 30% under the condition of EoS  α  = 0.8 and discount rate λ   = 8%, as compared to a fixed centralized design. The results also indicate that a flexible decentralized design outperforms other rigid designs under certain circumstances since it not only reduces transportation costs but also takes advantage of flexibility, such as deferring investment and avoiding unnecessary capacity deployment. The modeling framework and results help designers and managers better compare centralized and decentralized design alternatives facing significant uncertainty. The proposed method helps them analyze the value of flexibility (VOF) in small-scale urban environments, while considering explicitly the tradeoffs between EoS and the time-value of money.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

NPV (expressed in S$million) of fixed designs capacities (expressed in tpd) under deterministic analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Recycled food waste in each sector and (b) GBM simulation of total recycled food waste (5 out of 2000 runs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

NPVs of flexible centralized design and optimum fixed design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

VOF with different discount rates (EoS factor α = 0.8)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In