Research Papers: Design for Manufacture and the Life Cycle

A Pareto-Optimal Approach to Multimaterial Topology Optimization

[+] Author and Article Information
Amir M. Mirzendehdel

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: mirzendehdel@wisc.edu

Krishnan Suresh

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: ksuresh@wisc.edu

Contributed by the Design for Manufacturing Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 10, 2015; final manuscript received July 10, 2015; published online August 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carolyn Seepersad.

J. Mech. Des 137(10), 101701 (Aug 06, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: MD-15-1081; doi: 10.1115/1.4031088 History: Received February 10, 2015

As additive manufacturing (AM) expands into multimaterial, there is a demand for efficient multimaterial topology optimization (MMTO), where one must simultaneously optimize the topology and the distribution of various materials within the topology. The classic approach to multimaterial optimization is to minimize compliance or stress while imposing two sets of constraints: (1) a total volume constraint and (2) individual volume-fraction constraint on each of the material constituents. The latter can artificially restrict the design space. Instead, the total mass and compliance are treated as conflicting objectives, and the corresponding Pareto curve is traced; no additional constraint is imposed on the material composition. To trace the Pareto curve, first-order element sensitivity fields are computed, and a two-step algorithm is proposed. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated through illustrative examples in 3D.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

From problem specification to optimal part

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Design space for a TO problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The Pareto-optimal curve and topologies for a single material (A)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Topological and element sensitivity fields for the single-material 2D L-bracket problem: (a) plot of 2D topological sensitivity field and (b) plot of 2D element sensitivity field

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Tracing the Pareto curve and the two substeps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Feasible regions with respect to change in inefficiency and cost

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Subalgorithm 1, reducing C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Subalgorithm 2, increasing performance while keeping C constant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Three-dimensional structuring element for morphological filtering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The Pareto curves and topologies for single material (A) and two materials (A and B)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

CG iterations for the L-bracket with (a) single material A and (b) two materials A and B

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pareto curves for 10,000 and 40,000 elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

MBB structure with 10,000 and 40,000 elements at weight fraction of 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Cantilevered beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Effect of number of materials on Pareto curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

C-bracket problem considered in Ref. [51]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Convergence plot of C-bracket

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Table design geometry and boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Table design using a single material

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Table design using three materials




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In