Research Papers: Design of Mechanisms and Robotic Systems

Dynamics and Trajectory Planning for Reconfigurable Space Multibody Robots

[+] Author and Article Information
Quan Hu

School of Aerospace Engineering,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
Beijing 100081, China
e-mail: huquan2690@bit.edu.cn

Jingrui Zhang

School of Aerospace Engineering,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
Beijing 100081, China
e-mail: zhangjingrui@bit.edu.cn

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 15, 2014; final manuscript received June 30, 2015; published online July 30, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Ettore Pennestri.

J. Mech. Des 137(9), 092304 (Jul 30, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: MD-14-1588; doi: 10.1115/1.4031055 History: Received September 15, 2014

A free-floating space robot equipped with multiple reconfigurable manipulators is designed and investigated in this paper. Lockable passive cylindrical joints (PCJs) are utilized to make the manipulator have the ability of changing its length and twisted angle. Each cylindrical joint, connecting two adjacent rigid links, has no embedded actuators but a brake mechanism. Normally, the mechanism is locked during the operation. When in the reconfiguration stage, two manipulators grasp each other to form a closed loop. Then one PCJ is unlocked, whose relative rotation and translation can be changed by the active torques at other joints. This system is a typical space multibody system. The dynamics of the space robot with unlocked cylindrical joints and a closed structural loop is investigated. The equations of motion are derived through Maggi–Kane's method. The obtained mathematical model is free of multipliers, which makes it suitable for controller design. A trajectory planning algorithm capable of avoiding the configuration singularity of the manipulators is proposed. A slide mode controller embedded with an extended state observer (ESO) is designed for the trajectory tracking control. Numerical simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the trajectory planning and control strategy for the reconfiguration process.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ghafoor, N. , and Sallaberger, C. , 2006, “Canadian Robotic Systems for Space Exploration,” 57th International Astronautical Congress, Valencia, Spain, Oct. 2–6, Paper No. IAC-06-A5.2.03.
Nguyen Huynh, T. C. , and Sharf, I. , 2010, “Capture of Spinning Target With Space Manipulator Using Magneto Rheological Damper,” AIAA Paper No. 2010-7753.
Akin, D. L. , 2009, “Integrating Dexterous Robotics Into the Constellation Architecture: Challenges and Opportunities,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-1867.
Kumar, A. , and Waldron, K. J. , 1981, “The Workspaces of a Mechanical Manipulator,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 103(3), pp. 665–672. [CrossRef]
Gupta, K. C. , and Roth, B. , 1982, “Design Considerations for Manipulator Workspace,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 104(4), pp. 704–711. [CrossRef]
Zhu, W. , Lamarche, T. , Dupuis, E. , Jameux, D. , Barnard, P. , and Liu, G. , 2013, “Precision Control of Modular Robot Manipulators: The VDC Approach With Embedded FPGA,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 29(5), pp. 1162–1179. [CrossRef]
Aghili, F. , and Parsa, K. , 2009, “A Reconfigurable Robot With Lockable Cylindrical Joints,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 25(4), pp. 785–797. [CrossRef]
Aghili, F. , 2010, “A Reconfigurable Robot With Telescopic Links for In-Space Servicing,” AIAA Paper No. 2010-8021.
Wang, J. T. , and Huston, R. L. , 1987, “Kane's Equations With Undetermined Multipliers-Application of Constrained Multibody Systems,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 54(2), pp. 424–429. [CrossRef]
Mariti, L. , Belfiore, N. P. , Pennestrì, E. , and Valentini, P. P. , 2011, “Comparison of Solution Strategies for Multibody Dynamics Equations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 88(7), pp. 637–656. [CrossRef]
Cheng, H. , Yiu, Y. , and Li, Z. , 2003, “Dynamics and Control of Redundantly Actuated Parallel Manipulators,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 8(4), pp. 483–491. [CrossRef]
Banerjee, A. K. , 2003, “Contributions of Multibody Dynamics to Space Flight: A Brief Review,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 26(3), pp. 385–394. [CrossRef]
Muller, A. , 2011, “Semialgebraic Regularization of Kinematic Loop Constraints in Multibody System Models,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 6(4), p. 041010. [CrossRef]
Saha, S. K. , 1997, “A Decomposition of the Manipulator Inertia Matrix,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 13(2), pp. 301–304. [CrossRef]
Saha, S. K. , 1999, “Dynamics of Serial Multibody Systems Using the Decoupled Natural Orthogonal Complement Matrices,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 66(4), pp. 986–996. [CrossRef]
Shah, S. V. , Saha, S. K. , and Dutt, J. K. , 2013, Dynamics of Tree-Type Robotic Systems, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Banerjee, A. K. , and Kane, T. R. , 1984, “Large Motion Dynamics of a Spacecraft With a Closed-Loop, Articulated, Flexible Appendage,” AIAA Paper No. A84-34911.
Kane, T. R. , and Levinson, D. A. , 1985, Dynamics Theory and Application, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bajodah, A. H. , Hodges, D. H. , and Chen, Y. H. , 2003, “A New Form of Kane's Equations of Motion for Constrained Systems,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 26(1), pp. 79–88. [CrossRef]
Hu, Q. , Jia, Y. , and Xu, S. , 2012, “A New Computer-Oriented Approach With Efficient Variables for Multibody Dynamics With Motion Constraints,” Acta Astronaut., 81(1), pp. 380–389. [CrossRef]
De Silva , C. W. , 1991, “Trajectory Design for Robotic Manipulators in Space Applications,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 14(3), pp. 670–674. [CrossRef]
Yale, G. E. , and Agrawal, B. N. , 1998, “Lyapunov Controller for Cooperative Space Manipulators,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 21(3), pp. 477–484. [CrossRef]
Su, H. J. , Dietmaier, P. , and McCarthy, J. M. , 2004, “Trajectory Planning for Constrained Parallel Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(4), pp. 709–716 . [CrossRef]
Wang, Z. , and Ghorbel, F. H. , 2006, “Control of Closed Kinematic Chains Using a Singularly Perturbed Dynamics Model,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 128(1), pp. 142–151. [CrossRef]
Ghorbel, F. H. , Chetelat, O. , Gunawardana, R. , and Longchamp, R. , 2000, “Modeling and Set Point Control of Closed-Chain Mechanisms: Theory and Experiment,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 8(5), pp. 801–815. [CrossRef]
Hughes, P. C. , 1986, Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics, Wiley, New York, pp. 522–534.
Banerjee, A. K. , and Lemak, M. E. , 2007, “Recursive Algorithm With Efficient Variables for Flexible Multibody Dynamics With Multiloop Constraints,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 30(3), pp. 780–790. [CrossRef]
Yoon, S. , Howe, R. M. , and Greenwood, D. T. , 1995, “Stability and Accuracy Analysis of Baumgarte's Constraint Violation Stabilization Method,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 117(3), pp. 446–453. [CrossRef]
Bauchau, O. A. , and Laulusa, A. , 2008, “Review of Contemporary Approaches for Constraint Enforcement in Multibody Systems,” ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 3(1), p. 011005. [CrossRef]
Kurdila, A. K. , 1990, “Multibody Dynamics Formulations Using Maggi's Approach,” Mechanics and Control of Large Flexible Structures, J. L. Junkins , ed., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC, pp. 101–144.
Shah, S. V. , Saha, S. K. , and Dutt, J. K. , 2012, “Modular Framework for Dynamics of Tree-Type Legged Robots,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 49, pp. 234–255. [CrossRef]
Wie, B. , 2005, “Singularity Escape/Avoidance Steering Logic for Control Moment Gyro Systems,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 28(5), pp. 948–956. [CrossRef]
Kurokawa, H. , 2007, “Survey of Theory and Steering Laws of Single-Gimbal Control Moment Gyros,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 30(5), pp. 1331–1340. [CrossRef]
Jia, Y. , Hu, Q. , and Xu, S. , 2013, “Dynamics of a Spacecraft With Motion Constrained Multi-Strut Passive Damper for Large Flexible Appendage,” Acta Mech. Sin., 29(2), pp. 294–308. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y. , and Han, J. , 2000, “Analysis and Design for the Second Order Nonlinear Continuous Extended States Observer,” Chin. Sci. Bull., 45(21), pp. 1938–1944. [CrossRef]
Walker, M. W. , and Orin, D. E. , 1982, “Efficient Dynamic Computer Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 104(3), pp. 205–211. [CrossRef]
Fijany, A. , Sharf, I. , and D'Eleuterio, G. M. T. , 1995, “Parallel O(log N) Algorithms for Computation of Manipulator Forward Dynamics,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 11(3), pp. 389–400. [CrossRef]
Agarwal, A. , Shah, S. V. , Bandyopadhyay, S. , and Saha, S. K. , 2014, “Dynamics of Serial Kinematic Chains With Large Number of Degrees-of-Freedom,” Multibody Syst. Dyn., 32(3), pp. 273–298. [CrossRef]
Banerjee, A. K. , 1993, “Block-Diagonal Equations for Multibody Elastodynamics With Geometric Stiffness and Constraints,” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 16(6), pp. 1092–1100. [CrossRef]
Guo, B. , and Zhao, Z. , 2011, “On the Convergence of an Extended State Observer for Nonlinear Systems With Uncertainty,” Syst. Control Lett., 60(6), pp. 420–430. [CrossRef]
Guo, B. , and Zhao, Z. , 2013, “On Convergence of the Nonlinear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for MIMO Systems,” SIAM J. Control Optim., 51(2), pp. 1727–1757. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A space platform with three reconfigurable manipulators

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Reference frames and sizes of the manipulators, and (b) the length of the links is changeable

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Expand manipulators 1 and 2 from their initial position; (b) the EEs grasp each other to form a loop; (c) unlock PCJ 1 to change the length of the first long link of manipulator 1; (d) lock PCJ 1 and unlock PCJ 2 to change the length of the second long link of manipulator 1; (e) the EEs release each other after the length changing of manipulators 1 and 2; and (f) the configuration of the manipulator 3 can also be changed by the same approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Sketch of a reconfigurable space robot at the reconfiguration stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Revolute joint and (b) cylindrical joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Equivalent system for the robot in reconfiguration stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Motion at the released PCJ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Joint torques of (a) links 11–13 and (b) links 14–16

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Singularity measurement of M2′

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Attitude response of B1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Disturbing force and torque at the PCJ of B12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Desired relative rotational speeds: (a) links 11–13 and (b) links 14–16

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Errors of the relative rotational angles: (a) links 11–13 and (b) links 14–16

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Block diagram of the controller

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

(a) Momentum balance and (b) energy balance




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In