Papers: Incorporating user needs into engineering design

Requirements Development: Approaches and Behaviors of Novice Designers

[+] Author and Article Information
Ibrahim Mohedas

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
2350 Hayward Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: imohedas@umich.edu

Shanna R. Daly

College of Engineering,
University of Michigan,
210 Gorguze Family Laboratory,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: srdaly@umich.edu

Kathleen H. Sienko

Departments of Mechanical &
Biomedical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
2350 Hayward Street,
Ann Arbor, MI, 48109
e-mail: sienko@umich.edu

Observations were available 11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. and stakeholder interviews were available 10:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m.–3:40 p.m.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 29, 2014; final manuscript received February 22, 2015; published online May 19, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carolyn Seepersad.

J. Mech. Des 137(7), 071407 (Jul 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-14-1657; doi: 10.1115/1.4030058 History: Received September 29, 2014; Revised February 22, 2015; Online May 19, 2015

Elicitation and development of product requirements are crucial aspects of front-end design and have significant impacts on future product success. This study sought to better understand how novice designers approach the development of product requirements during a front-end design task. Results showed that the stakeholder validity of participants' requirements and the level of tailoring of the requirements to the design context and stakeholders were highly correlated to the number of distinct information sources used and moderately correlated to participants' dependency on particular information sources. Furthermore, an in-depth exploration of participants' information gathering behavior during the design task elucidated specific strategies and processes that may explain why some participants were more successful than others.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Design
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Gupta, A. K., and Wilemon, D. L., 1990, “Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products,” Calif. Manage. Rev., 32(2), pp. 24–44.
Cooper, R. G., 1988, “Predevelopment Activities Determine New Product Success,” Ind. Mark. Manage., 17(3), pp. 237–247. [CrossRef]
Khurana, A., and Rosenthal, S. R., 1998, “Towards Holistic ‘Front Ends' in New Product Development,” J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 15(1), pp. 57–74. [CrossRef]
Kim, J., and Wilemon, D., 2002, “Focusing the Fuzzy Front-End in New Product Development,” R&D Manage., 32(4), pp. 269–279. [CrossRef]
Murphy, S. A., and Kumar, V., 1997, “The Front End of New Product Development: A Canadian Survey,” R&D Manage., 27(1), pp. 5–15. [CrossRef]
Dorst, K., and Cross, N., 2001, “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem–Solution,” Des. Stud., 22(5), pp. 425–437. [CrossRef]
McGuinness, N. W., and Conway, H. A., 1989, “Managing the Search for New Product Concepts: A Strategic Approach,” R&D Manage., 19(4), pp. 297–308. [CrossRef]
Davis, A. M., 1993, Software Requirements: Objects, Functions, and States, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Dieter, G. E., 2012, “Problem Definition and Need Identification,” Engineering Design, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 75–115.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K. H., 2006, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 3rd ed., Springer, London, UK.
Nuseibeh, B., and Easterbrook, S., 2000, “Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap,” Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, ACM, Limerick, Ireland, June 4–11, pp. 35–46 [CrossRef].
Dym, C. L., Little, P., and Orwin, E., 2013, Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Maiden, N., and Rugg, G., 1996, “ACRE: Selecting Methods For Requirements Acquisition,” Software Eng. J., 11(3), pp. 183–192. [CrossRef]
Davis, A. M., 1992, “Operational Prototyping: A New Development Approach,” IEEE Software, 9(5), pp. 70–78. [CrossRef]
Goguen, J. A., and Linde, C., 1993, “Techniques for Requirements Elicitation,” 1st IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’93), IEEE, San Diego, CA, Jan. 4–6, pp. 152–164 [CrossRef].
Sommerville, I., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Bentley, R., and Twidale, M., 1993, “Integrating Ethnography into the Requirements Engineering Process,” 1st IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’93), IEEE, San Diego, CA, Jan. 4–6, pp. 165–173 [CrossRef].
Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R., and Sienko, K. H., 2015, “Applying Design Ethnography: A Case Example of a Medical Device in a Low-Resource Setting,” International Conference on Engineering Design.
Macaulay, L., and Mylopoulos, J., 1995, “Requirements Engineering: An Educational Dilemma,” Autom. Software Eng., 2(4), pp. 343–351. [CrossRef]
Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R., and Sienko, K. H., 2015, “Characterizing Novice Use of Design Ethnography Utilizing Skill Acquisition and Learning Theories,” Mudd Design Workshop, Los Angeles.
Mohedas, I., Cravens, G. L., Daly, S. R., and Sienko, K. H., 2015, “Student Perceptions of Stakeholders During Capstone Design,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R., and Sienko, K. H., 2014, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 30(4), pp. 888–900.
Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., and Nachtmann, H. L., 1999, “A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes,” Des. Stud., 20(2), pp. 131–152. [CrossRef]
Atman, C. J., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., and Adams, R., 2005, “Comparing Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes: An In-Depth Follow-Up Study,” Des. Stud., 26(4), pp. 325–357. [CrossRef]
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J., 2007, “Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners,” J. Eng. Educ., 96(4), pp. 359–379. [CrossRef]
Bursic, K. M., and Atman, C. J., 1997, “Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process,” Qual. Manage. J., 4(4), pp. 60–75.
Sobek, D. K., II, and Jain, V. K., 2007, “Relating Design Process to Quality: A Virtual Design of Experiments Approach,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(5), pp. 483–490. [CrossRef]
Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R., and Sienko, K. H., 2014, “Gathering and Synthesizing Information During the Development of User Requirements and Engineering Specifications,” 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15–18, Paper No. 10353.
Mohedas, I., Daly, S. R., and Sienko, K. H., 2014, “Student Use of Design Ethnography Techniques During Front-End Phases of Design,” 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15–18, Paper No. 10357.
Ingwersen, P., and Jarvelin, K., 2005, The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilson, T. D., 1999, “Models in Information Behavior Research,” J. Doc., 55(3), pp. 249–270. [CrossRef]
Tanni, M., and Sormunen, E., 2008, “A Critical Review of Research on Information Behavior in Assigned Learning Tasks,” J. Doc., 64(6), pp. 893–914. [CrossRef]
Alexandersson, M., and Limberg, L., 2003, “Constructing Meaning Through Information Artefacts,” New Rev. Inf. Behav. Res., 4(1), pp. 17–30 [CrossRef].
Hultgren, F., and Limberg, L., 2003, “A Study of Research on Children's Information Behaviour in a School Context,” New Rev. Inf. Behav. Res., 4(1), pp. 1–15 [CrossRef].
Limberg, L., 1999, “Experiencing Information Seeking and Learning: A Study of the Interaction Between Two Phenomena,” Inf. Res., 5(1), pp. 5–1.
McGregor, J. H., and Streitenberger, D. C., 1998, “Do Scribes Learn?: Copying and Information Use,” Sch. Libr. Media Res., 1, pp. 1–16.
Wertz, R. E. H., Purzer, Ş., Fosmire, M. J., and Cardella, M. E., 2013, “Assessing Information Literacy Skills Demonstrated in an Engineering Design Task,” J. Eng. Educ., 102(4), pp. 577–602. [CrossRef]
Blandin, J. S., Brown, W. B., and Kock, J. L., 1974, “Uncertainty and Information-Gathering Behavior: An Empirical Investigation,” Academy of Management National Meetings, Seattle, WA, pp. 54–55.
Austin-Breneman, J., Honda, T., and Yang, M. C., 2012, “A Study of Student Design Team Behaviors in Complex System Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(12), p. 124504. [CrossRef]
Walthall, C. J., Devanathan, S., Kisselburgh, L. G., Ramani, K., Hirleman, E. D., and Yang, M. C., 2011, “Evaluating Wikis as a Communicative Medium for Collaboration Within Colocated and Distributed Engineering Design Teams,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(7), p. 071001. [CrossRef]
Lemons, G., Carberry, A., Swan, C., Jarvin, L., and Rogers, C., 2010, “The Benefits of Model Building in Teaching Engineering Design,” Des. Stud., 31(3), pp. 288–309. [CrossRef]
Ensici, A., and Badke-Schaub, P., 2011, “Information Behavior in Multidisciplinary Design Teams,” 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11), Impacting Society Through Engineering Design, Vol. 7: Human Behaviour in Design, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, Aug. 15–18, pp. 414–423, p. DS 68-7.
Daly, S., Adams, R., and Bodner, G., 2012, “What Does It Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences,” J. Eng. Educ., 101(2), pp. 187–219. [CrossRef]
Dally, J. W., and Zhang, G. M., 1993, “A Freshman Engineering Design Course,” J. Eng. Educ., 82(2), pp. 83–91. [CrossRef]
Daly, S. R., McGowan, A., and Papalambros, P., 2013, “Using Qualitative Research Methods in Engineering Design Research,” 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 19–22, pp. 203–212, p. DS 75-2.
Sommerville, I., and Kotonya, G., 1998, Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Garvin, D. A., 1987, “Competing on the 8 Dimensions of Quality,” Harv. Bus. Rev., 65(6), pp. 101–109.
Gause, D. C., and Weinberg, G. M., 1989, Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design, Dorset House, New York.
Génova, G., Fuentes, J. M., Llorens, J., Hurtado, O., and Moreno, V., 2013, “A Framework to Measure and Improve the Quality of Textual Requirements,” Requir. Eng., 18(1), pp. 25–41. [CrossRef]
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., and Chicken, E., 2013, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Ryan, G. W., and Bernard, H. R., 2003, “Techniques to Identify Themes,” Field Methods, 15(1), pp. 85–109. [CrossRef]
Creswell, J. W., 2013, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Westbrook, L., 1994, “Qualitative Research Methods: A Review of Major Stages, Data Analysis Techniques, and Quality Controls,” Libr. Inf. Sci. Res., 16(3), pp. 241–254. [CrossRef]
Patton, M. Q., 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Atman, C. J., Deibel, K., and Borgford-Parnell, J., 2009, “The Process of Engineering Design: A Comparison of Three Representations,” 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 09), Vol. 1: Design Processes, Stanford, CA, Aug. 24–27, pp. 483–494, p. DS 58-1.
Bailey, R., 2008, “Comparative Study of Undergraduate and Practicing Engineer Knowledge of the Roles of Problem Definition and Idea Generation in Design,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 24(2), pp. 226–233.
Schuler, D., and Namioka, A., 1993, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Goffin, K., Varnes, C. J., van der Hoven, C., and Koners, U., 2012, “Beyond the Voice of the Customer: Ethnographic Market Research,” Res. Technol. Manage., 55(4), pp. 45–54. [CrossRef]
Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., and Swenton-Wall, P., 1993, “Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design,” Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, D.Shuler and A.Namioka, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 123–155.
Malterud, K., 2001, “Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Guidelines,” Lancet, 358(9280), pp. 483–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhang, T., and Dong, H., 2009, “Human-Centred Design: An Emergent Conceptual Model,” Include2009, Royal College of Art, London, Apr. 8–10, pp. 1–7.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Validity of participants' (P = participant) product requirements as evaluated by stakeholders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Numbers of requirements developed by participants as classified using Garvin's first six dimensions (basic requirements) and those requirements that were context/stakeholder specific (feature/aesthetic requirements)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Participants' use of diverse information sources (P = participant) and their dependence on particular information sources. Citations were normalized in Fig. 3(b) by dividing the total number of requirements (i.e., 1.0 indicates that the information source was cited in all of the participants' requirements).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Correlations between assessment of participants' requirements and the diversity of information sources (a) and (b); and their dependence on particular sources (c) and (d). Numbers in parentheses indicate overlapping data points (Q1 data points to the left of symbols and Q2 data points to the right of data points).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Timeline showing time use during the interactive design task for Participants 6 and 7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Summary of Participants' 2 and 5 time use during the course of the interactive design task

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time spent discussing specific topics by Participants 6 and 7 during interviews with stakeholders




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In