0
Papers: Incorporating user needs into engineering design

Communicating Consumer Needs in the Design Process of Branded Products

[+] Author and Article Information
Golnoosh Rasoulifar

University of Michigan,
216 Gorguze Family Laboratory,
2609 Draper Drive,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101
e-mail: Golnoosh.rasoulifar@gmail.com

Claudia Eckert

Professor
MCT Laboratory,
Open University,
Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
e-mail: claudia.eckert@open.ac.uk

Guy Prudhomme

Associated Professor
G-SCOP Laboratory,
University of Grenoble Alpes,
CNRS, Grenoble F-38000, France
e-mail: guy.prudhomme@g-scop.inpg.fr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 15, 2014; final manuscript received January 24, 2015; published online May 19, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Bernard Yannou.

J. Mech. Des 137(7), 071404 (Jul 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-14-1612; doi: 10.1115/1.4030050 History: Received September 15, 2014; Revised January 24, 2015; Online May 19, 2015

User preferences in design process of branded products are addressed through several layers of mediation occurring at the interfaces between consumers, product designers, and engineering designers, whereby product designers act as proxies for consumers. Rather than interacting directly each group makes assumptions about the consumer needs and preferences, which are not explicitly communicated. This paper explains the mediation layers between design team and consumers through a literature based framework of branded product emotions. The mediation in the design team is explained through a case study of communication across disciplinary boundaries.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Design , Teams
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Several mediation layers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Framework of branded product emotions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Awareness of importance of different data types for product designers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Awareness of importance of different data types for engineering designers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Average level of importance accorded to each information to be exchanged

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Use and efficiency of product representations for the communication

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In