0
Papers: User needs and preferences elicitation

Large-Scale Needfinding: Methods of Increasing User-Generated Needs From Large Populations

[+] Author and Article Information
Cory R. Schaffhausen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: schaf390@umn.edu

Timothy M. Kowalewski

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: timk@umn.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received September 11, 2014; final manuscript received February 13, 2015; published online May 19, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Carolyn Seepersad.

J. Mech. Des 137(7), 071403 (Jul 01, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: MD-14-1561; doi: 10.1115/1.4030161 History: Received September 11, 2014; Revised February 13, 2015; Online May 19, 2015

Understanding user needs and preferences is increasingly recognized as a critical component of early stage product development. The large-scale needfinding methods in this series of studies attempt to overcome shortcomings with existing methods, particularly in environments with limited user access. The three studies evaluated three specific types of stimuli to help users describe higher quantities of needs. Users were trained on need statements and then asked to enter as many need statements and optional background stories as possible. One or more stimulus types were presented, including prompts (a type of thought exercise), shared needs, and shared context images. Topics used were general household areas including cooking, cleaning, and trip planning. The results show that users can articulate a large number of needs unaided, and users consistently increased need quantity after viewing a stimulus. A final study collected 1735 needs statements and 1246 stories from 402 individuals in 24 hr. Shared needs and images significantly increased need quantity over other types. User experience (and not expertise) was a significant factor for increasing quantity, but may not warrant exclusive use of high-experience users in practice.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Patnaik, D., and Becker, R., 1999, “Needfinding: The Why and How of Uncovering People's Needs,” Des. Manage. J., 10(2), pp. 37–43. [CrossRef]
Zenios, S. A., Makower, J., Yock, P. G., Brinton, T. J., Kumar, U. N., Denend, L., and Krummel, T. M., 2010, Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies, Cambridge University, New York. [CrossRef]
Getzels, J. W., 1979, “Problem Finding: A Theoretical Note,” Cognit. Sci., 3(2), pp. 167–172. [CrossRef]
Beckman, S. L., and Barry, M., 2007, “Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking,” Calif. Manage. Rev., 50(1), pp. 25–56. [CrossRef]
Martin, J., Murphy, E., Crowe, J., and Norris, B., 2006, “Capturing User Requirements in Medical Device Development: The Role of Ergonomics,” Physiol. Meas., 27(8), pp. R49–R62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cooper, R., and Edgett, S., 2008, “Ideation for Product Innovation: What Are the Best Methods?,” PDMA Visions Mag., 1, pp. 12–17.
Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D., and Goyal, A., 2011, Product Design and Development, Vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kelley, T., and Littman, J., 2001, The Art of Innovation, Crown Business, New York.
Gundlin, E., 2000, The 3M Way to Innovation, 1st ed., Kodansha Intl., Tokyo.
Alkaya, M., Visser, F. S., and De Lille, C., 2012, “Supporting NPD Teams in Innovation: Structuring User Data on the Foundations of Empathy,” Leading Innovation Through Design: Proceedings of the Design Management Institute 2012 International Research Conference, Design Management Institute, pp. 1–8.
Kouprie, M., and Visser, F. S., 2009, “A Framework for Empathy in Design: Stepping Into and Out of the User's Life,” J. Eng. Des., 20(5), pp. 437–448. [CrossRef]
Johnson, D. G., Genco, N., Saunders, M. N., Williams, P., Seepersad, C. C., and Hölttä-Otto, K., 2014, “An Experimental Investigation of the Effectiveness of Empathic Experience Design for Innovative Concept Generation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(5), p. 051009. [CrossRef]
Elliott, R., and Jankel-Elliott, N., 2003, “Using Ethnography in Strategic Consumer Research,” Qual. Mark. Res., 6(4), pp. 215–223. [CrossRef]
Savenye, W., and Robinson, R., 1996, “Qualitative Research Issues and Methods: An Introduction for Educational Technologists,” Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, Macmillan Library Reference, New York, pp. 1171–1195.
Weiss, R., 1995, Learning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies, 1st ed., Free Press, New York.
Rubin, H. J., and Rubin, I. S., 2011, Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R., 1993, “The Voice of the Customer,” Mark. Sci., 12(1), pp. 1–27. [CrossRef]
Bayus, B. L., 2008, “Understanding Customer Needs,” The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management, S.Shane, ed., Wiley, West Sussex, UK, pp. 115–141.
Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D. R., and Mazursky, D., 2001, “The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success,” Manage. Sci., 47(1), pp. 69–84. [CrossRef]
Balachandra, R., and Friar, J. H., 1997, “Factors for Success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A Contextual Framework,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 44(3), pp. 276–287. [CrossRef]
Holbrook, M. B., and Hirschman, E. C., 1982, “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” J. Consum. Res., 9(2), pp. 132–140. [CrossRef]
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., and Griffin, M., 1994, “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” J. Consum. Res., 20(4), pp. 644–656. [CrossRef]
Desmet, P. M., and Hekkert, P., 2007, “Framework of Product Experience,” Int. J. Des., 1(1), pp. 57–66.
Kudrowitz, B. M., and Wallace, D., 2013, “Assessing the Quality of Ideas From Prolific, Early-Stage Product Ideation,” J. Eng. Des., 24(2), pp. 120–139. [CrossRef]
Dean, D. L., Hender, J. M., Rodgers, T. L., and Santanen, E. L., 2006, “Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 7(10), pp. 646–698.
Osborn, A. F., 1953, Applied Imagination, Scribner's, New York.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., and Balthazard, P. A., 1996, “Lessons From a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings,” J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 13(3), pp. 163–207.
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., and Maynard, M. T., 2004, “Virtual Teams: What do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?,” J. Manage., 30(6), pp. 805–835.
VanGundy, A. B., 1984, “Brain Writing for New Product Ideas: An Alternative to Brainstorming,” J. Consum. Mark., 1(2), pp. 67–74. [CrossRef]
Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., and Nunamaker, J. F., 1992, “Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size,” Acad. Manage. J., 35(2), pp. 350–369. [CrossRef]
Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B., and Hoppen, N., 1999, “Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity,” Inf. Syst. Res., 10(2), pp. 110–133. [CrossRef]
DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., and Hantula, D. A., 2007, “The Medium Matters: Mining the Long-Promised Merit of Group Interaction in Creative Idea Generation Tasks in a Meta-Analysis of the Electronic Group Brainstorming Literature,” Comput. Hum. Behav., 23(3), pp. 1549–1581. [CrossRef]
Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., and Arditti, L. E., 2011, “Effects of Quantity and Quality Instructions on Brainstorming,” J. Creat. Behav., 45(1), pp. 38–46. [CrossRef]
Diehl, M., and Stroebe, W., 1987, “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 53(3), pp. 497–509. [CrossRef]
Dugosh, K. L., and Paulus, P. B., 2005, “Cognitive and Social Comparison Processes in Brainstorming,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 41(3), pp. 313–320. [CrossRef]
Morgan, J., and Wang, R., 2010, “Tournaments for Ideas,” Calif. Manage. Rev., 52(2), pp. 77–97. [CrossRef]
Jansson, D. G., and Smith, S. M., 1991, “Design Fixation,” Des. Stud., 12(1), pp. 3–11. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K., and Schunn, C., 2010, “A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(4), p. 041003. [CrossRef]
Viswanathan, V. K., and Linsey, J. S., 2013, “Design Fixation and Its Mitigation: A Study on the Role of Expertise,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(5), p. 051008. [CrossRef]
IDEO, 2003, Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design, Palo Alto, CA.
Lin, J., and Seepersad, C. C., 2007, “Empathic Lead Users: The Effects of Extraordinary User Experiences on Customer Needs Analysis and Product Redesign,” ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 289–296.
Chesbrough, H. W., 2006, “The Era of Open Innovation,” Managing Innovation Change, 127(3), pp. 34–41.
Dow, S., Gerber, E., and Wong, A., 2013, “A Pilot Study of Using Crowds in the Classroom,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’13, ACM, pp. 227–236. [CrossRef]
Stone, T., and Choi, S.-K., 2013, “Extracting Consumer Preference From User-Generated Content Sources Using Classification,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-13228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed]
Faste, H., 2011, “Opening ‘Open’ Innovation,” Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI’11, ACM, pp. 54:1–54:8.
Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., and Lodewijkx, H. F., 2002, “Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Groups: Exposure Effects in an Idea Generation Task,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 38(6), pp. 535–544. [CrossRef]
Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., and Yang, H.-C., 2000, “Cognitive Stimulation in Brainstorming,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 79(5), pp. 722–735. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kohn, N. W., Paulus, P. B., and Choi, Y., 2011, “Building on the Ideas of Others: An Examination of the Idea Combination Process,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 47(3), pp. 554–561. [CrossRef]
Dennis, A. R., Minas, R. K., and Bhagwatwar, A. P., 2013, “Sparking Creativity: Improving Electronic Brainstorming With Individual Cognitive Priming,” J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 29(4), pp. 195–216. [CrossRef]
Rosenthal, S., and Capper, M., 2006, “Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences,” J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 23(3), pp. 215–237. [CrossRef]
Toh, C. A., and Miller, S. R., 2014, “The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(9), p. 091004. [CrossRef]
Martin, J., and Barnett, J., 2012, “Integrating the Results of User Research Into Medical Device Development: Insights From a Case Study,” BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making, 12(74), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Kramer, D. B., Xu, S., and Kesselheim, A. S., 2012, “How Does Medical Device Regulation Perform in the United States and the European Union? A Systematic Review,” PLoS Med., 9(7), p. 1001276. [CrossRef]
Money, A., Barnett, J., Kuljis, J., Craven, M., Martin, J., and Young, T., 2011, “The Role of the User Within the Medical Device Design and Development Process: Medical Device Manufacturers' Perspectives,” BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making, 11(15), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Shah, A., and Alshawi, S., 2010, “The Role of User Requirements Research in Medical Device Development,” European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Abu Dhabi, UAE, EMCIS2010, pp. 1–25.
Poulton, B., 1999, “User Involvement in Identifying Health Needs and Shaping and Evaluating Services: Is it Being Realised?,” J. Adv. Nurs., 30(6), pp. 1289–1296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ram, M., Campling, N., Grocott, P., and Weir, H., 2008, “A Methodology for a Structured Survey of the Healthcare Literature Related to Medical Device Users,” Evaluation, 14(1), pp. 49–73. [CrossRef]
Vredenburg, K., Mao, J., Smith, P., and Carey, T., 2002, “A Survey of User-Centered Design Practice,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves, ACM, pp. 471–478. [CrossRef]
Aquino Shluzas, L., Steinert, M., and Leifer, L. J., 2011, “Designing to Maximize Value for Multiple Stakeholders: A Challenge to Med-Tech Innovation,” 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 10: Design Methods and Tools pt. 2, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Aug. 15–19, pp. 159–166.
Shah, S., and Robinson, I., 2007, “Benefits of and Barriers to Involving Users in Medical Device Technology Development and Evaluation,” Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 23(1), pp. 131–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kauppinen, M., Kujala, S., Aaltio, T., and Lehtola, L., 2002, “Introducing Requirements Engineering: How to Make a Cultural Change Happen in Practice,” IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 43–51. [CrossRef]
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., and Ipeirotis, P., 2010, “Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk,” Judgment Decis. Making, 5(5), pp. 411–419.
Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., and Westfall, P., 2010, Multiple Comparisons Using R, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [CrossRef]
Mason, W., and Watts, D. J., 2010, “Financial Incentives and the Performance of Crowds,” ACM SigKDD Explor. Newslett., 11(2), pp. 100–108. [CrossRef]
Nov, O., Anderson, D., and Arazy, O., 2010, “Volunteer Computing: A Model of the Factors Determining Contribution to Community-Based Scientific Research,” Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM, pp. 741–750. [CrossRef]
Curran, V. R., and Fleet, L., 2005, “A Review of Evaluation Outcomes of Web-Based Continuing Medical Education,” Med. Educ., 39(6), pp. 561–567. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Summary schematic of study 1 and study 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Study 3 user interface for entering needs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Summary outline of prompt matrix

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Study 2 comparison of stimulus types

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Study 3 needs submitted for each help type

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Study 3 diminishing returns with increasing help (lines at 90%, 95%, and 98% are shown)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Needs submitted by each expertise group (group sizes, n, are shown)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Needs submitted by each experience group (group sizes, n, are shown)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Distribution of needs submitted per person across expertise groups

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Rates of need entries for studies 2 and 3 (line at 90% shown)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In