0
Research Papers: Design Automation

Hinge-Free Compliant Mechanism Design Via the Topological Level-Set

[+] Author and Article Information
Anirudh Krishnakumar

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
UW-Madison,
Madison, WI 53706

Krishnan Suresh

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
UW-Madison,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: suresh@engr.wisc.edu

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received June 16, 2013; final manuscript received October 24, 2014; published online January 30, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Shinji Nishiwaki.

J. Mech. Des 137(3), 031406 (Mar 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1264; doi: 10.1115/1.4029335 History: Received June 16, 2013; Revised October 24, 2014; Online January 30, 2015

The objective of this paper is to introduce and demonstrate a new method for the topology optimization of compliant mechanisms. The proposed method relies on exploiting the topological derivative, and exhibits numerous desirable properties including: (1) the mechanisms are hinge-free; (2) mechanisms with different geometric and mechanical advantages (GA and MA) can be generated by varying a single control parameter; (3) a target volume fraction need not be specified, instead numerous designs, of decreasing volume fractions, are generated in a single optimization run; and (4) the underlying finite element stiffness matrices are well-conditioned. The proposed method and implementation are illustrated through numerical experiments in 2D and 3D.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The secondary output problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The primary input problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Classic inverter problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A hypothetical topological change

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

A hypothetical shape change

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The three topological sensitivity fields. (a) Input topological sensitivity, (b) Output topological sensitivity fields, and (c) Mutual topological sensitivity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pathological case of a disconnected mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Topological sensitivity field for w = (0,0,1). (a) Topological sensitivity field and a cutting plane and (b) Induced domain Ωτ.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Fixed point iteration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

A finite element model with bilinear quad elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

A new topology with reduced volume fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Estimating the topological sensitivities over the out elements. (a) Compute field over in-elements, (b) Estimate field over the nodes, and (c) Estimate over ‘out’ elements near boundary.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The proposed algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

2D finite element model for the inverter problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The inverter design; deformation in (b) is scaled for clarity. (a) Final design and (b) Un-deformed and deformed mesh.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Mechanism history for the inverter. (a) Geometric and mechanical advantages and (b) Objective function.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Intermediate designs for the inverter at volume fractions of 0.3 and 0.4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

History of the GA and MA for the symmetric inverter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Symmetric inverter for 1000 elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Cruncher design for η = 0.5. (a) Final design and (b) Geometric and mechanical advantages.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Cruncher for η = 0.6. (a) Final design and (b) Geometric and mechanical advantages.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Grasper problem. (a) Full model and (b) Model exploiting symmetry.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Symmetric inverter problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Symmetric inverter for 500 elements (η = 0.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

3D inverter problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 28

Finite element discretization with 2000 elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 29

3D inverter design. (a) Un-deformed and (b) Deformed.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In