0
Research Papers: Design Automation

Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis Using the Total Probability Theorem

[+] Author and Article Information
Zissimos P. Mourelatos

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Oakland University,
2200 N. Squirrel Road,
Rochester, MI 48309
e-mail: mourelat@oakland.edu

Monica Majcher

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Oakland University,
2200 N. Squirrel Road,
Rochester, MI 48309
e-mail: mtmajch2@oakland.edu

Vijitashwa Pandey

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Oakland University,
2200 N. Squirrel Road,
Rochester, MI 48309
e-mail: pandey2@oakland.edu

Igor Baseski

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Oakland University,
2200 N. Squirrel Road,
Rochester, MI 48309
e-mail: ibaseski@oakland.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received July 11, 2014; final manuscript received November 28, 2014; published online January 9, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Xiaoping Du.

J. Mech. Des 137(3), 031405 (Mar 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MD-14-1417; doi: 10.1115/1.4029326 History: Received July 11, 2014; Revised November 28, 2014; Online January 09, 2015

A new reliability analysis method is proposed for time-dependent problems with explicit in time limit-state functions of input random variables and input random processes using the total probability theorem and the concept of composite limit state. The input random processes are assumed Gaussian. They are expressed in terms of standard normal variables using a spectral decomposition method. The total probability theorem is employed to calculate the time-dependent probability of failure using time-dependent conditional probabilities which are computed accurately and efficiently in the standard normal space using the first-order reliability method (FORM) and a composite limit state of linear instantaneous limit states. If the dimensionality of the total probability theorem integral is small, we can easily calculate it using Gauss quadrature numerical integration. Otherwise, simple Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) or adaptive importance sampling are used based on a Kriging metamodel of the conditional probabilities. An example from the literature on the design of a hydrokinetic turbine blade under time-dependent river flow load demonstrates all developments.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Singh, A., Mourelatos, Z. P., and Li, J., 2010, “Design for Lifecycle Cost Using Time-Dependent Reliability,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(9), p. 091008. [CrossRef]
Singh, A., Mourelatos, Z. P., and Li, J., 2010, “Design for Lifecycle Cost and Preventive Maintenance Using Time-Dependent Reliability,” Adv. Mater. Res., 118–120(10), pp. 10–16. [CrossRef]
Andrieu-Renaud, C., Sudret, B., and Lemaire, M., 2004, “The PHI2 Method: A Way to Compute Time-Variant Reliability,” Reliab. Eng. Saf. Syst., 84(1), pp. 75–86. [CrossRef]
Rice, S. O., 1954, “Mathematical Analysis of Random Noise,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., 23(3), pp. 282–332 [Republished in: Wax, N., ed., 1954, Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes, Dover, New York]. [CrossRef]
Rackwitz, R., 1998, “Computational Techniques in Stationary and NonStationary Load Combination—A Review and Some Extensions,” J. Struct. Eng., 25(1), pp. 1–20.
Sudret, B., 2008, “Analytical Derivation of the Outcrossing Rate in Time-variant Reliability Problems,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 4(5), pp. 356–362. [CrossRef]
Zhang, J., and Du, X., 2011, “Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis for Function Generator Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(3), p. 031005. [CrossRef]
Savage, G. J., and Son, Y. K., 2009, “Dependability-Based Design Optimization of Degrading Engineering Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(1), p. 011002. [CrossRef]
Son, Y. K., and Savage, G. J., 2007, “Set Theoretic Formulation of Performance Reliability of Multiple Response Time-Variant Systems due to Degradations in System Components,” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 23(2), pp. 171–188. [CrossRef]
Singh, A., and Mourelatos, Z. P., 2010, “On the Time-Dependent Reliability of Non-Monotonic, Non-Repairable Systems,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 3(1), pp. 425–444. [CrossRef]
Hu, Z., and Du, X., 2013, “A Sampling Approach to Extreme Value Distribution for Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(7), p. 071003. [CrossRef]
Hu, Z., Li, H., Du, X., and Chandrashekhara, K., 2012, “Simulation-Based Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis for Composite Hydrokinetic Turbine Blades,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 47(5), pp. 765–781. [CrossRef]
Li, J., and Mourelatos, Z. P., 2009, “Time-Dependent Reliability Estimation for Dynamic Problems Using a Niching Genetic Algorithm,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(7), p. 071009. [CrossRef]
Hu, Z., and Du, X., 2012, “Reliability Analysis for Hydrokinetic Turbine Blades,” Renewable Energy, 48, pp. 251–262. [CrossRef]
Madsen, P. H., and Krenk, S., 1984, “An Integral Equation Method for the First Passage Problem in Random Vibration,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 51(3), pp. 674–679. [CrossRef]
Singh, A., and Mourelatos, Z. P., 2010, “Time-Dependent Reliability Estimation for Dynamic Systems Using a Random Process Approach,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 3(1), pp. 339–355. [CrossRef]
Singh, A., Mourelatos, Z. P., and Nikolaidis, E., 2011, “Time-Dependent Reliability of Random Dynamic Systems Using Time-Series Modeling and Importance Sampling,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 4(1), pp. 929–946. [CrossRef]
Au, S. K., and Beck, J. L., 2001, “Estimation of Small Failure Probability in High Dimensions Simulation,” Probab. Eng. Mech., 16(4), pp. 263–277. [CrossRef]
Au, S. K., and Beck, J. L., 2003, “Subset Simulation and its Application to Seismic Risk Based on Dynamic Analysis,” J. Eng. Mech., 129(8), pp. 901–917. [CrossRef]
Beck, J. L., and Au, S. K., 2002, “Bayesian Updating of Structural Models and Reliability Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation,” J. Eng. Mech., 128(4), pp. 380–391. [CrossRef]
Ching, J., Beck, J. L., and Au, S. K., 2005, “Reliability Estimation for Dynamic Systems Subject to Stochastic Excitation Using Subset Simulation With Splitting,” Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 194(12–16), pp. 1557–1579. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z., Mourelatos, Z. P., Li, J., Baseski, I., and Singh, A., 2014, “Time-Dependent Reliability of Dynamic Systems Using Subset Simulation With Splitting Over a Series of Correlated Time Intervals,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(6), p. 061008. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z., and Wang, P., 2012, “A Nested Extreme Response Surface Approach for Time-Dependent Reliability-Based Design Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(12), p. 121007. [CrossRef]
Chen, J. B., and Li, J., 2007, “The Extreme Value Distribution and Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Nonlinear Structures With Uncertain Parameters,” Struct. Saf., 29(2), pp. 77–93. [CrossRef]
Li, C. C., and Kiureghian, A. D., 1993, “Optimal Discretization of Random Fields,” J. Eng. Mech., 119(6), pp. 1136–1154. [CrossRef]
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., eds, 1965, Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover Publications, New York.
Melchers, R. E., 1999, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, 2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
Liang, J., Mourelatos, Z. P., and E.Nikolaidis, 2007, “A Single-Loop Approach for System Reliability-Based Design Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(12), pp. 1215–1224. [CrossRef]
Martin, O. L. H., 2008, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, 2nd ed., Earthscan, Sterling, VA.
Ye, Q., Li, W., and Sudjianto, A., 2003, “Algorithmic Construction of Optimal Symmetric Latin Hypercube Designs,” J. Stat. Plann. Inference, 90(1), pp. 145–159. [CrossRef]
Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O., 2005, Structural Reliability Methods, 2nd ed. (published online).
Wehrwein, D., and Mourelatos, Z. P., 2009, “Optimization of Engine Torque Management Under Uncertainty for Vehicle Driveline Clunk Using Time-Dependent Metamodels,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of a composite limit state

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Illustration of probability of failure calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cross section of turbine blade at the root [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

River flow load on the turbine blade [11]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Realizations of velocity v(t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Reliability index with random variables at mean values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Composite limit state for t = 8.2 months and Δt = 0.2 months with random variables at mean values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Composite limit state for t = 8.2 months and Δt = 0.05 months

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Sensitivity of conditional probability of failure P(F/W) at t = 8.2 with h1, h2, ɛa, and l1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Conditional probability of failure at all 50 training points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of estimated Pf(0,T) with MCS as a function of Δt

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In