Research Papers: Design Automation

A Novel Transformable Structural Mechanism for Doubly Ruled Hypar Surfaces

[+] Author and Article Information
Feray Maden

Department of Architecture,
Izmir Institute of Technology,
Izmir 35430, Turkey
e-mail: feraymaden@gmail.com

Engin Aktaş

Department of Civil Engineering,
Izmir Institute of Technology,
Izmir 35430, Turkey
e-mail: enginaktas@iyte.edu.tr

Koray Korkmaz

Department of Architecture,
Izmir Institute of Technology,
Izmir 35430, Turkey
e-mail: koraykorkmaz@iyte.edu.tr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received May 22, 2014; final manuscript received November 17, 2014; published online January 9, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Matthew B. Parkinson.

J. Mech. Des 137(3), 031404 (Mar 01, 2015) (14 pages) Paper No: MD-14-1295; doi: 10.1115/1.4029231 History: Received May 22, 2014; Revised November 17, 2014; Online January 09, 2015

A novel structural mechanism (SM) that is capable of transforming itself into various hyperbolic paraboloid (hypar) geometries is introduced in this paper. Composed of straight bars and novel joint types, the SM is designed based on the ruled surface generation method. Thus, the paper first investigates the geometrical properties and morphology of the hypar surface. Second, it constructs the SM and discusses its transformation capability with respect to its kinematic properties. Then, it presents a parametric model not only to analyze the geometry and possible configurations of the SM but also to prepare a model for the structural analysis. Finally, a transformable shelter structure is proposed as an architectural application of the SM and its feasibility is tested based on the structural analysis conducted in different configurations of the structure. According to the results of the structural analysis, the strength, and the stiffness of the structure are discussed in detail.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Pinero, E., 1961, “Project for a Mobile Theatre,” Archit. Des., 31(12), p. 570.
Zeigler, T., 1976, “Collapsable Self-Supporting Structures,” U.S. Patent No. 3,968,808.
Escrig, F., 1985, “Expendable Space Structures,” Int. J. Space Struct., 1(2), pp. 79–91.
Gantes, C., Connor, J. J., Logcher, R. D., and Rosenfeld, Y., 1989, “Structural Analysis and Design of Deployable Structures,” Comput. Struct., 32(3/4), pp. 661–669. [CrossRef]
Hoberman, C., 1993, “The Iris Dome,” L'Arca, 5(73), pp. 54–57.
Kokawa, T., 2000, “Structural Idea of Retractable Loop-Dome,” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spat. Struct., 41(133), pp. 107–114.
You, Z., and Pellegrino, S., 1997, “Foldable Bar Structures,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 34(15), pp. 1825–1847. [CrossRef]
Gioia, F., Dureisseix, D., Motro, R., and Maurin, B., 2012, “Design and Analysis of a Foldable/Unfoldable Corrugated Architectural Curved Envelop,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(3), p. 031003. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y., and You, Z., 2005, “Deployable Structure,” U.S. Patent Application No. 6,941,704 B2.
Langbecker, T., and Albermani, F., 2001, “Kinematic and Non-Linear Analysis of Foldable Barrel Vaults,” Eng. Struct., 23(2), pp. 158–171. [CrossRef]
Van Mele, T., De Temmerman, N., De Laet, L., and Mollaert, M., 2010, “Scissor-Hinged Retractable Membrane Structures,” Int. J. Struct. Eng., 1(3/4), pp. 374–396. [CrossRef]
Akgün, Y., Gantes, C. J., Sobek, W., Korkmaz, K., and Kalochairetis, K., 2011, “A Novel Adaptive Spatial Scissor-Hinge Structural Mechanism for Convertible Roofs,” Eng. Struct., 33(4), pp. 1365–1376. [CrossRef]
Al Khayer, M., and Lalvani, H., 1998, “Scissors-Action Deployables Based on Space-Filling of Polygonal Hyperboloids,” IUTAM-IASS Symposium on Deployable Structures: Theory and Applications, Cambridge, UK, Sept. 6–9, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Langbecker, T., 2000, “Kinematic and Non-Linear Analysis of Foldable Scissor Structures,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Hoberman, C., “Expanding Helicoid and Expanding Hypar,” Available at: http://www.hoberman.com/portfolio.php
Petrova, P., 2008, “An Anti-Clastic, Double-Curved SELs Structure,” Proceeding of the 1st Symposium on Architectural Geometry, Advances in Architectural Geometry, Vienna, pp. 111–114.
Roovers, K., Mira, L. A., and De Temmerman, N., 2013, “From Surface to Scissor Structure,” Proceedings of the First Conference Transformables, Seville, Editorial Starbooks, Seville, Spain, pp. 275–280.
Maden, F., Korkmaz, K., and Akgün, Y., 2013, “Design of Reconfigurable Doubly-Curved Canopy Structure,” Proceedings of the ICSA 2013—Structures and Architecture: Concepts, Applications, and Challenges, P. J. S.Cruz., ed., Gumaraes, Portugal, July 24–26, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, pp. 1040–1047.
Alizade, R., 2010, “Structural Synthesis of Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the AZcIFToMM 2010 International Symposium of Mechanism and Machine Science, Izmir, pp. 11–32.
Korkmaz, K., Akgün, Y., and Maden, F., 2012, “Design of a 2DOF 8R Linkage for Transformable Hypar Structure,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., 40(1), pp. 19–32. [CrossRef]
European Structural Steel Standard EN 10025, 2004, “Part 2—Technical Delivery Conditions for Non-Alloy Structural Steels,” BSI, London.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 1991-1-4, 2005, Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures—Part 1-4: General Actions—Wind Actions, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
Australian/New Zealand Standard, 2002, Structural Design Actions; Part 2: Wind Actions, AS/NZS, Sydney, Australia.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 1991-1-3, 2003, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 1-3: General Actions—Snow Loads, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 1990, 2002, Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Transformation process of 2DOF LM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Transformation process of 2DOF SM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) y = 0 plane; (b) y = b/n plane; (c) x = 0 plane; and (d) x = b/n plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Generation of doubly ruled hypar surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Hyperboloid composed of SLEs; (b) hyperboloid composed of straight bars; (c) hypar composed of SLEs; and (d) hypar composed of straight bars

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) New joint type; (b) 3R joint; (c) C2R joint; and (d) 2CR joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Transformation process of 2DOF SM composed of three SGs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Parametric model of the hypar generated in Grasshopper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Hypar surface generated by increasing the number of SG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Hypar surface generated by changing the deployment angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Configuration 2 (β1 = β2 = 30): distribution of von Misses stresses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Configuration 3 (β1 = β2 = 45): distribution of von Misses stresses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Configuration 4 (β1 = β2 = −30): distribution of von Misses stresses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Configuration 5 (β1 = β2 = −45): distribution of von Misses stresses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Proposed transformable shelter structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Configuration 1 (β1 = β2 = 0): distribution of von Misses stresses



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In