Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Empirical Studies of Designer Thinking: Past, Present, and Future

[+] Author and Article Information
Mahmoud Dinar

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Arizona State University,
Tempe, AZ 85287
e-mail: mdinar@asu.edu

Jami J. Shah

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
Arizona State University,
Tempe, AZ 85287
e-mail: jami.shah@asu.edu

Jonathan Cagan

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Carnegie Mellon University,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
e-mail: jcag@andrew.cmu.edu

Larry Leifer

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Stanford University,
Stanford, CA 94305
e-mail: larry.leifer@stanford.edu

Julie Linsey

George W. Woodruff
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30313
e-mail: julie.linsey@me.gatech.edu

Steven M. Smith

Department of Psychology,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: stevesmith@tamu.edu

Noe Vargas Hernandez

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at El Paso,
El Paso, TX 79902
e-mail: nvargas@utep.edu

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received November 12, 2013; final manuscript received November 3, 2014; published online November 26, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Janis Terpenny.

J. Mech. Des 137(2), 021101 (Feb 01, 2015) (13 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1523; doi: 10.1115/1.4029025 History: Received November 12, 2013; Revised November 03, 2014; Online November 26, 2014

Understanding how designers think is core to advancing design methods, tools, and outcomes. Engineering researchers have effectively turned to cognitive science approaches to studying the engineering design process. Empirical methods used for studying designer thinking have included verbal protocols, case studies, and controlled experiments. Studies have looked at the role of design methods, strategies, tools, environment, experience, and group dynamics. Early empirical studies were casual and exploratory with loosely defined objectives and informal analysis methods. Current studies have become more formal, factor controlled, aiming at hypothesis testing, using statistical design of experiments (DOE) and analysis methods such as analysis of variations (ANOVA). Popular pursuits include comparison of experts and novices, identifying and overcoming fixation, role of analogies, effectiveness of ideation methods, and other various tools. This paper first reviews a snapshot of the different approaches to study designers and their processes. Once the current basis is established, the paper explores directions for future or expanded research in this rich and critical area of designer thinking. A variety of data may be collected, and related to both the process and the outcome (designs). But there are still no standards for designing, collecting and analyzing data, partly due to the lack of cognitive models and theories of designer thinking. Data analysis is tedious and the rate of discoveries has been slow. Future studies may need to develop computer based data collection and automated analyses, which may facilitate collection of massive amounts of data with the potential of rapid advancement of the rate of discoveries and development of designer thinking cognitive models. The purpose of this paper is to provide a roadmap to the vast literature for the benefit of new researchers, and also a retrospective for the community.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Design , Teams
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Classification of protocol study methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Graphical language for coding (from Ref. [62])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Alternative representation of protocol data (from Ref. [61])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experiment fixation experiment procedure [68]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Wilde's teamology [140,141] (a) classification of roles and (b) mapping team composite characteristics




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In