Research Papers: Mechanisms and Robotics

Kinetostatic Modeling of Fully Compliant Bistable Mechanisms Using Timoshenko Beam Constraint Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Guimin Chen

School of Electro-Mechanical Engineering,
Xidian University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
e-mail: guimin.chen@gmail.com

Fulei Ma

School of Electro-Mechanical Engineering,
Xidian University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received November 6, 2013; final manuscript received October 20, 2014; published online November 26, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Kazuhiro Saitou.

J. Mech. Des 137(2), 022301 (Feb 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1513; doi: 10.1115/1.4029024 History: Received November 06, 2013; Revised October 20, 2014; Online November 26, 2014

Fully compliant bistable mechanisms (FCBMs) have numerous applications in both micro- and macroscale devices, but the nonlinearities associated with the deflections of the flexible members and the kinetostatic behaviors have made it difficult to design. Currently, the design of FCBMs relies heavily on nonlinear finite element modeling. In this paper, an analytical kinetostatic model is developed for FCBMs based on the beam constraint model (BCM) that captures the geometric nonlinearities of beam flexures that undergo relatively small deflections. An improved BCM (i.e., Timoshenko BCM (TBCM)) is derived based on the Timoshenko beam theory in order to include shear effects in the model. The results for three FCBM designs show that the kinetostatic model can successfully identify the bistable behaviors and make reasonable predictions for the locations of the unstable equilibrium points and the stable equilibrium positions. The inclusion of shear effects in the TBCM model significantly improves the prediction accuracy over the BCM model, as compared to the finite element analysis (FEA) results.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A simple beam flexure subject to combined force and moment loads. Δx(L) and Δx(L) are denoted as Δx and Δx for convenience, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Photographs of a FCBM prototype at its as-fabricated position and second stable equilibrium position. This prototype contains six identical bistable fixed-guided limbs (Nl = 6).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Deflections of beam flexures subject to pure transverse forces predicted using BCM and TBCM (with the value of the ratio YTBCM/BCM for each flexure shown)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic showing the parameterization of a bistable fixed-guided limb. The out-of-plane thickness of the mechanism is denoted as w.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The free body diagram of a bistable limb. The positive directions of the forces and the deflections are indicated by the reference arrows.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The kinetostatic behaviors of design 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The kinetostatic behaviors of design 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Prototype photographs of design 1 at its two stable positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The axial and the transverse forces of beam flexure 1 at different deflected positions and their contributions to shear deflections along the Y1-axis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Fixed-guided bistable compliant mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The kinetostatic behaviors of design 3




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In