Design Innovation Paper

Topology Optimization of an Automotive Tailor-Welded Blank Door

[+] Author and Article Information
Guangyao Li, Fengxiang Xu

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design
and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body,
Hunan University,
Changsha 410082, China

Xiaodong Huang

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design
and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body,
Hunan University,
Changsha 410082, China
Centre for Innovative Structures and Materials,
School of Civil, Environmental,
and Chemical Engineering,
RMIT University,
GPO Box 2476,
Melbourne 3001, Australia

Guangyong Sun

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design
and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body,
Hunan University,
Changsha 410082, China
e-mail: sgy800@126.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Innovation and Devices of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received August 8, 2013; final manuscript received September 16, 2014; published online March 5, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Kazuhiro Saitou.

J. Mech. Des 137(5), 055001 (May 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1341; doi: 10.1115/1.4028704 History: Received August 08, 2013; Revised September 16, 2014; Online March 05, 2015

Bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method has been successfully applied for a wide range of topology optimization problems. In this paper, the BESO method is further extended to the optimal design of an automotive tailor-welded blank (TWB) door with multiple thicknesses. Different from the traditional topology optimization for solid-void designs, topology optimization of the TWB door needs to identify the weld lines which joint sheets with different thicknesses. The finite element (FE) model of the automotive door assembly is established and verified by a series of stiffness experiments. Then, the proposed optimization procedure is applied to the optimization of the automotive TWB indoor panel for the optimal thickness layout and weld lines locations. Numerical results give guidelines for the lightweight design of TWB components to some extent.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bendsøe, M. P., and Kikuchi, N., 1988, “Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 71(2), pp. 197–224. [CrossRef]
Rozvany, G. I. N., Zhou, M., and Birker, T., 1992, “Generalized Shape Optimization Without Homogenization,” Struct. Optim., 4(3–4), pp. 250–252. [CrossRef]
Rozvany, G. I. N., Bendsøe, M. P., and Kirsch, U., 1995, “Layout Optimization of Structures,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 48(2), p. 41. [CrossRef]
Xie, Y. M., and Steven, G. P., 1993, “A Simple Evolutionary Procedure for Structural Optimization,” Comput. Struct., 49(5), pp. 885–896. [CrossRef]
Maute, K., and Frangopol, D. M., 2003, “Reliability-Based Design of MEMS Mechanisms by Topology Optimization,” Comput. Struct., 81(8–11), pp. 813–824. [CrossRef]
Kang, Z., and Tong, L., 2008, “Integrated Optimization of Material Layout and Control Voltage for Piezoelectric Laminated Plates,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 19(8), pp. 889–904. [CrossRef]
Paulino, G. H., Silva, E. C. N., and Le, C. H., 2009, “Optimal Design of Periodic Functionally Graded Composites With Prescribed Properties,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 38(5), pp. 469–489. [CrossRef]
Andreasen, C. S., Gersborg, A. R., and Sigmund, O., 2009, “Topology Optimization of Microfluidic Mixers,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 61(5), pp. 498–513. [CrossRef]
Diaz, A. R., and Sigmund, O., 2010, “A Topology Optimization Method for Design of Negative Permeability Metamaterials,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 41(2), pp. 163–177. [CrossRef]
Xie, Y. M., and Steven, G. P., 1997, Basic Evolutionary Structural Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Chu, D. N., Xie, Y. M., Hira, A., and Steven, G. P., 1996, “Evolutionary Structural Optimization for Problems With Stiffness Constraints,” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 21(4), pp. 239–251. [CrossRef]
Xie, Y. M., and Steven, G. P., 1996, “Evolutionary Structural Optimization for Dynamic Problems,” Comput. Struct., 58(6), pp. 1067–1073. [CrossRef]
Jiao, H. Y., Zhou, Q. C., Li, W. J., and Li, Y., 2012, “A New Algorithm for Evolutionary Structural Optimization in Mechanical Engineering,” Adv. Mech. Electron. Eng., 176, pp. 303–309. [CrossRef]
Hu, X., Cheng, H., and Tao, Y., 2012, “Modified Rejection Ratio for Multiple Load Cases Evolutionary Structural Optimization,” Procedia Eng., 31, pp. 627–633. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., and Xie, Y. M., 2010, Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures: Methods and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
Huang, X., Xie, Y. M., and Burry, M. C., 2007, “Advantages of Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO) Over Evolutionary Structural Optimization (ESO),” Adv. Struct. Eng., 10(6), pp. 727–737. [CrossRef]
Querin, O. M., Young, V., Steven, G. P., and Xie, Y. M., 2000, “Computational Efficiency and Validation of Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimisation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 189(2), pp. 559–573. [CrossRef]
Yang, X. Y., Xie, Y. M., Steven, G. P., and Querin, O. M., 1999, “Bidirectional Evolutionary Method for Stiffness Optimization,” AIAA J., 37(11), pp. 1483–1488. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., and Xie, Y. M., 2007, “Convergent and Mesh-Independent Solutions for the Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization Method,” Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 43(14), pp. 1039–1049. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., Zuo, Z. H., and Xie, Y. M., 2010, “Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Vibrating Continuum Structures for Natural Frequencies,” Comput. Struct., 88(5–6), pp. 357–364. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., Xie, Y. M., and Lu, G., 2007, “Topology Optimization of Energy Absorption Structures,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, 12(6), pp. 663–675. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., and Xie, Y. M., 2009, “Bi-Directional Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures With One or Multiple Materials,” Comput. Mech., 43(3), pp. 393–401. [CrossRef]
Michell, A. G. M., 1904, “LVIII. The Limits of Economy of Material in Frame-structures,” Phil. Mag., 8(47), pp. 589–597. [CrossRef]
Bulman, S., Sienz, J., and Hinton, E., 2001, “Comparisons Between Algorithms The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Mag for Structural Topology Optimization Using a Aeries of Benchmark Studies,” Comput. Struct., 79(12), pp. 1203–1218. [CrossRef]
Bendsøe, M. P., and Sigmund, O., 1999, “Material Interpolation Schemes in Topology Optimization,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 69(9–10), pp. 635–654. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., and Xie, Y. M., 2010, “A Further Review of ESO Type Methods for Topology Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 41(5), pp. 671–683. [CrossRef]
Young, V., Querin, O. M., Steven, G. P., and Xie, Y. M., 1999, “3D and Multiple Load Case Bi-Directional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO),” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 18(2–3), pp. 183–192. [CrossRef]
Young, V., Querin, O. M., Steven, G. P., and Xie, Y. M., 1998, “3D Bi-directional Evolutionary Structural Optimisation (BESO),” Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Structural Optimization, Sydney, Australia, pp. 275–282.
Cai, K., Gao, Z., and Shi, J., 2012, “Compliance Optimization of a Continuum With Bimodulus Material Under Multiple Load Cases,” Comput. Aided Des., 45(2), pp. 195–203. [CrossRef]
Pan, F., Zhu, P., and Zhang, Y., 2010, “Metamodel-Based Lightweight Design of B-pillar With TWB Structure Via Support Vector Regression,” Comput. Struct., 88(1–2), pp. 36–44. [CrossRef]
Song, S. I., and Park, G. J., 2006, “Multidisciplinary Optimization of an Automotive Door With a Tailored Blank,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D., 220(2), pp. 151–163. [CrossRef]
Chan, S. M., Chan, L. C., and Lee, T. C., 2003, “Tailor-Welded Blanks of Different Thickness Ratios Effects on Forming Limit Diagrams,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 132(1–3), pp. 95–101. [CrossRef]
Kusuda, H., Takasago, T., and Natsumi, F., 1997, “Formability of Tailored Blanks,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 71(1), pp. 134–140. [CrossRef]
Shin, J. K., Lee, K. H., Song, S. I., and Park, G. J., 2002, “Automotive Door Design With the ULSAB Concept Using Structural Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 23(4), pp. 320–327. [CrossRef]
Lee, K. H., Shin, J. K., Song, S. I., Yoo, Y. M., and Park, G. J., 2003, “Automotive Door Design Using Structural Optimization and Design of Experiments,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D., 217(10), pp. 855–865. [CrossRef]
Zienkiewicz, O. C., 1971, The Finite Element in Engineering Sciences, McGraw-Hill Co., London, UK.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Process of continuous laser welding for TWB structures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Exploded view of the door assembly: (a) outer panel and its accessories; (b) inner panel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Loading and boundary conditions for automotive door stiffness: (a) vertical sag analysis; (b) upper lateral analysis; and (c) lower lateral analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Stiffness experimental tests of automotive door assembly: (a) vertical sag; (b) upper lateral; and (c) lower lateral

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental results from door stiffness analysis. (a) vertical sag; (b) upper lateral; and (c) lower lateral.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Evolution histories of the mean compliance and volume fraction (Vf) of TWB indoor panel: (a) case a; (b) case b; (c) case c; and (d) case d

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

BESO optimal designs for TWB indoor panel under various load cases: (a) case a; (b) case b; (c) case c; and (d) case d




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In