0
Research Papers: Design Automation

Miura-Base Rigid Origami: Parametrizations of Curved-Crease Geometries

[+] Author and Article Information
Joseph M. Gattas

School of Civil Engineering,
University of Queensland,
St. Lucia QLD 4072, Australia
e-mail: j.gattas@uq.edu.au

Zhong You

Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 3PJ, UK
e-mail: zhong.you@eng.ox.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received November 5, 2013; final manuscript received September 1, 2014; published online October 20, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Karthik Ramani.

J. Mech. Des 136(12), 121404 (Oct 20, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1509; doi: 10.1115/1.4028532 History: Received November 05, 2013; Revised September 01, 2014

Curved-crease (CC) origami differs from prismatic, or straight-crease origami, in that the folded surface of the pattern is bent during the folding process. Limited studies on the mechanical performance of such geometries have been conducted, in part because of the difficulty in parametrizing and modeling the pattern geometry. This paper presents a new method for generating and parametrizing rigid-foldable, CC geometries from Miura-derivative prismatic base patterns. The two stages of the method, the ellipse creation stage and rigid subdivision stage, are first demonstrated on a Miura-base pattern to generate a CC Miura pattern. It is shown that a single additional parameter to that required for the straight-crease pattern is sufficient to completely define the CC variant. The process is then applied to tapered Miura, Arc, Arc-Miura, and piecewise patterns to generate CC variants of each. All parametrizations are validated by comparison with physical prototypes and compiled into a matlab Toolbox for subsequent work.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Demaine, E., Demaine, M., Koschitz, D., and Tachi, T., 2011, “Curved Crease Folding: A Review on Art, Design and Mathematics,” Proceedings of the IABSE-IASS Symposium: Taller, Longer, Lighter (IABSE-IASS2011), London, England, Sept. 20–23.
Demaine, E., Demaine, M., and Koschitz, D., 2011, “Reconstructing David Huffman's Legacy in Curved-Crease Folding,” Origami 5: Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education, P.Wang-Iverson, R. J.Lang, and M.Yim, eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Singapore, pp. 39–52.
Huffman, D. A., 1976, “Curvature and Creases: A Primer on Paper,” IEEE Trans. Comput. C, 25(10), pp. 1010–1019. [CrossRef]
Miura, K., 1972, “Zeta-Core Sandwich—Its Concept and Realization,” Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo, Report No. 480, pp. 137–164.
Heimbs, S., 2013, “Foldcore Sandwich Structures and Their Impact Behaviour: An Overview,” Dynamic Failure of Composite and Sandwich Structures, SE-11 (Vol. 192 of Solid Mechanics and Its Applications), Springer, Netherlands, pp. 491–544.
Saito, K., Pellegrino, S., and Nojima, T., “Manufacture of Arbitrary Cross-Section Composite Honeycomb Cores Based on Origami Techniques,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 136(5), p. 051011. [CrossRef]
Schenk, M., and Guest, S. D., 2011, “Origami Folding: A Structural Engineering Approach,” Origami 5: Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education, R. J.Lang, P.Wang-Iverson, and M.Yim, eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Singapore, pp. 291–303.
Gioia, F., Dureisseix, D., Motro, R., and Maurin, B., “Design and Analysis of a Foldable/Unfoldable Corrugated Architectural Curved Envelop,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(3), p. 031003. [CrossRef]
Ma, J., and You, Z., 2014, “Energy Absorption of Thin-Walled Square Tubes With a Prefolded Origami Pattern—Part I: Geometry and Numerical Simulation,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 81(1), p. 011003. [CrossRef]
Tachi, T., 2013, “Designing Freeform Origami Tessellations by Generalizing Resch's Patterns,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(11), p. 111006. [CrossRef]
Davis, E., Demaine, E. D., Demaine, M. L., and Ramseyer, J., 2013, “Reconstructing David Huffman's Origami Tessellations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(11), p. 111010. [CrossRef]
Klett, Y., and Drechsler, K., 2011, “Designing Technical Tessellations,” Origami 5: Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education, P.Wang-Iverson, R. J.Lang, and M.Yim, eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Singapore, pp. 305–322.
Bowen, L. A., Grames, C. L., Magleby, S. P., Lang, R. J., and Howell, L. L., 2013, “An Approach for Understanding Action Origami as Kinematic Mechanisms,” ASME Paper No. DETC2013-13407. [CrossRef]
Tachi, T., 2009, “Generalization of Rigid-Foldable Quadrilateral-Mesh Origami,” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct., 50(162), pp. 173–179.
Nojima, T., and Saito, K., 2006, “Development of Newly Designed Ultra-Light Core Structures,” JSME Int. J., Ser. A, 49(1), pp. 38–42. [CrossRef]
Buri, H., Stotz, I., and Yves, W., 2011, “Curved Folded Plate Timber Structures,” IABSE-IASS Symposium, vol. CD-ROM IABSE-IASS, London, England.
Tachi, T., 2011, “Rigid-Foldable Thick Origami,” Origami 5: Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education, P.Wang-Iverson, R. J.Lang, and M.Yim, eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Singapore, pp. 253–264.
Kilian, M., Flöry, S., Chen, Z., Mitra, N. J., Sheffer, A., and Pottmann, H., 2008, “Curved Folding,” ACM Trans. Graphics (TOG), 27(3), p. 75. [CrossRef]
Solomon, J., Vouga, E., Wardetzky, M., and Grinspun, E., 2012, “Flexible Developable Surfaces,” Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 31, Wiley Online Library, pp. 1567–1576.
Epps, G., and Verma, S., 2013, “Curved Folding: Design to Fabrication Process of Robofold,” Shape Modeling International, Bournemouth, UK, July 10–13, pp. 75–83.
Gattas, J., Wu, W., and You, Z., 2013 “Miura-Base Rigid Origami: Parameterizations of First-Level Derivative and Piecewise Geometries,” ASME J. Mech. Des.135(11), p. 11011. [CrossRef]
Abbott, P., 2008, “On the Perimeter of an Ellipse,” Math. J., 11(2), pp. 172–185.
Edison, C. E., 2011, “Compression and Rotational Limitations of Curved Corrugations,” Origami 5: Fifth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education , Taylor & Francis Group, Singapore, pp. 69–79.
Gattas, J., 2013, “Rigid Origami Toolbox,” available at http://joegattas.com/rigid-origami-toolbox/

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Straight-crease Miura-base unit geometries and relevant parameters. Crease pattern, on left and folded configuration, on right. (a) Miura, (b) tapered Miura, (c) Arc, and (d) Arc-Miura.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

CC surfaces from developable surface inversion. (a) Cylindrical inversion and (b) conical inversion.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Ellipse creation on a prismatic Miura-base pattern. (a) Ellipse through three points, (b) longitudinal axes projection, (c) base and ellipse parameters, and (d) lower and upper bounds of ϕ .

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Crease pattern unrolled from a folded configuration. (a) Perpendicular projected ellipse and (b) unrolled pattern.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Rigid subdivision of CC pattern. (a) S = 1, 2, and 4 divisions, (b) straight-line segments between subdivided points, and (c) K rigid strips.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Maximum and minimum limits of CC foldability. (a) Isometric view and (b) top view.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of folding motion of simulated (left) and aluminum prototype (right) CC-Miura pattern

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Two tessellations of the CC-Miura pattern unit geometry. (a) Tessellation 1 and (b) tessellation 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Curved crease tapered Miura geometry creation. (a) Three point ellipse, (b) projected surface, (c) divisor lines and exploded rigid strips, and (d) crease pattern.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of folding motion of simulated (left) and paper prototype (right) CC-tapered Miura pattern

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

CC Arc geometry creation. (a) Three point ellipse, (b) projected curved surface, (c) divisor lines and exploded rigid panels, and (d) crease pattern.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of folding motion of simulated (left) and plastic prototype (right) CC-Arc pattern

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

CC Arc-Miura geometry creation. (a) Three point ellipse, (b) projected curved surface, (c) divisor lines and exploded rigid panels, and (d) crease pattern.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of folding motion of simulated (left) and paper prototype (right) CC-Arc-Miura pattern

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Formation of complex CC geometries from by conversion of straight-crease geometries. (a) Preserved closure condition in prismatic and CC Tapered Miura patterns and (b) CC piecewise geometries formed from Miura/Arc-Miura assemblies.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In