0
Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search

[+] Author and Article Information
Jeremy Murphy

Schlumberger Limited,
Sugarland, TX 77478

Katherine Fu

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Singapore University of Technology and Design,
Cambridge, MA 02139

Kevin Otto, Kristin Wood

Engineering Product,
Development Pillar,
Singapore University of Technology and Design,
Singapore 138682

Maria Yang

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139

Dan Jensen

United States Air Force Academy,
Colorado Springs, CO 80840

Freepatentsonline.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received June 20, 2013; final manuscript received July 16, 2014; published online August 14, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jonathan Cagan.

J. Mech. Des 136(10), 101102 (Aug 14, 2014) (16 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1271; doi: 10.1115/1.4028093 History: Received June 20, 2013; Revised July 16, 2014

Design-by-analogy is a powerful approach to augment traditional concept generation methods by expanding the set of generated ideas using similarity relationships from solutions to analogous problems. While the concept of design-by-analogy has been known for some time, few actual methods and tools exist to assist designers in systematically seeking and identifying analogies from general data sources, databases, or repositories, such as patent databases. A new method for extracting functional analogies from data sources has been developed to provide this capability, here based on a functional basis rather than form or conflict descriptions. Building on past research, we utilize a functional vector space model (VSM) to quantify analogous similarity of an idea's functionality. We quantitatively evaluate the functional similarity between represented design problems and, in this case, patent descriptions of products. We also develop document parsing algorithms to reduce text descriptions of the data sources down to the key functions, for use in the functional similarity analysis and functional vector space modeling. To do this, we apply Zipf's law on word count order reduction to reduce the words within the documents down to the applicable functionally critical terms, thus providing a mapping process for function based search. The reduction of a document into functional analogous words enables the matching to novel ideas that are functionally similar, which can be customized various ways. This approach thereby provides relevant sources of design-by-analogy inspiration. As a verification of the approach, two original design problem case studies illustrate the distance range of analogical solutions that can be extracted. This range extends from very near-field, literal solutions to far-field cross-domain analogies.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Salton, G., 1971, The SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Retrieval, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Salton, G., Wong, A., and Yang, C. S., 1975, “A Vector Space Model for Automatic Indexing,” Commun. ACM, 18(11), pp. 613–620. [CrossRef]
Schmid, H., 1994, “Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Tree,” International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, Manchester, UK, Vol. 12, pp. 44–49.
Kurfman, M., Rajan, J., Stone, R., and Wood, K., 2001, “Functional Modeling Experimental Studies,” ASME Paper No. DETC2001-21709. [CrossRef]
Kurfman, M., Rajan, J., Stone, R., and Wood, K., 2003, “Experimental Studies Assessing the Repeatability of a Functional Modeling Derivation Method,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(4), pp. 682–693. [CrossRef]
Stone, R., and Wood, K. L., 2000, “Development of a Functional Basis for Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 122(4), pp. 359–370. [CrossRef]
Hirtz, J., Stone, R. B., Mcadams, D. A., Szykman, S., and Wood, K. L., 2002, “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts,” Res. Eng. Des., 13, pp. 65–82. [CrossRef]
Otto, K., and Wood, K., 2001, Product Design Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., and Schutz, H., 2009, An Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Salton, G., and Waldstein, R. K., 1978, “Term Relevance Weights in On-Line Information Retrieval,” Inform. Process. Manage., 14(1), pp. 29–35. [CrossRef]
Wyllys, R. E., 1981, “Empirical and Theoretical Bases of Zipf's Law,” Libr. Trends, 30(1), pp. 53–64.
Zipf, G. K., 1949, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley, Oxford, UK.
Fellbaum, C., 1998, WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Miller, G. A., 1995, “WordNet: A Lexical Database for English,” Commun. ACM, 38(11), pp. 39–41. [CrossRef]
Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., and Kotovsky, K., 2011, “On the Benefits and Pitfalls of Analogies for Innovative Design: Ideation Performance Based on Analogical Distance, Commonness, and Modality of Examples,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(8), p. 081004. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J., Murphy, J., Markman, A., Wood, K. L., and Kortoglu, T., 2006, “Representing Analogies: Increasing the Probability of Innovation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2006-99383. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T. P., 2001, “A Scheme for Functional Reasoning in Conceptual Design,” Des. Stud., 22(6), pp. 493–517. [CrossRef]
Cheong, H., Chiu, I., Shu, L. H., Stone, R., and McAdams, D., 2011, “Biologically Meaningful Keywords for Functional Terms of the Functional Basis,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(2), p. 021007. [CrossRef]
Shu, L. H., Ueda, K., Chiu, I., and Cheong, H., 2011, “Biologically Inspired Design,” CIRP Ann., 60(2), pp. 673–693. [CrossRef]
Stone, R., and Wood, K., 2000, “A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures,” Des. Stud., 21(1), pp. 5–31.
Salonen, M., Holtta-Otto, K., and Otto, K., 2008, “Effecting Product Reliability and Life Cycle Costs With Early Design Phase Product Architecture Decisions,” Int. J. Prod. Dev., 5(1/2), pp. 109–124. [CrossRef]
Bohm, M., and Stone, R., 2004, “Product Design Support: Exploring a Design Repository System,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2004-61746. [CrossRef]
Bohm, M. R., Vucovich, J. P., and Stone, R. B., 2005, “Capturing Creativity: Using a Design Repository to Drive Concept Innovation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2005-85105. [CrossRef]
Bohm, M., and Stone, R., 2004, “Representing Functionality to Support Reuse: Conceptual and Supporting Functions,” ASME Paper No. DETC2004-57693. [CrossRef]
Szykman, S., Sriram, R. D., Bochenek, C., and Racz, J., 1999, “The NIST Design Repository Project,” Advances in Soft Computing—Engineering Design and Manufacturing, R. Roy, T. Furuhashi, and P. K. Chawdhry, eds., Springer-Verlag, London.
Szykman, S., Sriram, R. D., Bochenek, C., and Senfaute, J., 2000, “Design Repositories: Next-Generation Engineering Design Databases,” IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl., 15(3), pp. 48–55. [CrossRef]
Bryant, C., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Kurtoglu, T., and Campbell, M., 2005, “Concept Generation From the Functional Basis of Design,” 15th International Conference on Engineering Design: Engineering Design and the Global Economy, A. Samuel and W. Lewis (eds.), Barton, A.C.T. Engineers, Australia, pp. 1702–1715.
Bryant, C., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Kurtoglu, T., and Campbell, M., 2005, “A Computational Technique for Concept Generation,” ASME Paper No. DETC2005-85323. [CrossRef]
Terpenny, J., and Mathew, D., 2004, “Modeling Environment for Function-Based Conceptual Design,” ASME Paper No. DETC2004-57492. [CrossRef]
Potter, S., Culley, S. J., Darlington, M. J., and Chawdhry, P. K., 2003, “Automatic Conceptual Design Using Experience-Derived Heuristcs,” Res. Eng. Des., 14(3), pp. 131–144. [CrossRef]
Chiu, M., 2003, “Design Moves in Situated Design With Case-Based Reasoning,” Des. Stud., 24,(1) pp. 1–25. [CrossRef]
Gentner, D., 1983, “Structure Mapping—A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognit. Sci., 7, pp. 155–170.
Falkenhainer, B. F., Forbus, K. D., and Gentner, D., 1989, “The Structure Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 41(1), pp. 1–63. [CrossRef]
Gentner, D., and Markman, A. B., 1997, “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity,” Am. Psychol., 52(1), pp. 45–56. [CrossRef]
Fu, K., Chan, J., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K., Schunn, C., and Wood, K., 2013, “The Meaning of “Near” and “Far”: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(2), p. 021007. [CrossRef]
Kryssanov, V. V., Tamaki, H., and Kitamura, S., 2001, “Understanding Design Fundamentals: How Synthesis and Analysis Drive Creativity, Resulting in Emergence,” Artif. Intell. Eng., 15(4), pp. 329–342. [CrossRef]
Goldschmidt, G., and Weil, M., 1998, “Contents and Structure in Design Reasoning,” Des. Issues, 14(3), pp. 85–100. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K., and Schunn, C., 2010, “A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(4), p. 1041003. [CrossRef]
Goel, A., Bhatta, S., and Stroulia, E., 1997, “Kritik: An Early Case-Based Design System,” Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning in Design, M.Maher and P.Pu, eds., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 87–132.
Goel, A., and Chandrasekaran, B., 1989, “Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving,” Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1388–1394.
Bhatta, S., Goel, A., and Prabhakar, S., 1994, “Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach,” Artificial Intelligence in Design'94, Springer Netherlands, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 57–74.
Goel, A., and Bhatta, S., 2004, “Use of Design Patterns in Analogy-Based Design,” Adv. Eng. Inf., 18(2), pp. 85–94. [CrossRef]
Navinchandra, D., Sycara, K. P., and Narasimhan, S., 1991, “Behavioral Synthesis in CADET, a Case-Based Design Tool,” Seventh IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Application s, Vol. 1, pp. 217–221.
Qian, L., and Gero, J. S., 1992, “A Design Support System Using Analogy,” Artificial Intelligence in Design, J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks, eds., Springer, The Netherlands, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 795–813.
Liu, Y.-C., Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T. P., 2000, Artificial Intelligence in Design'00, J. S. Gero (ed.), Springer Netherlands, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 499–519.
Liu, Y.-C., Bligh, T. P., and Chakrabarti, A., 2003, “Towards an `Ideal' Approach for Concept Generation,” Des. Stud., 24(4), pp. 341–355. [CrossRef]
Hacco, E., and Shu, L. H., 2002, “Biomimetic Concept Generation Applied to Design for Remanufacture,” ASME Paper No. DETC2002/DFM-34177. [CrossRef]
Charlton, C. T., and Wallace, K. M., 2000, “A Web Broker for Component Retrieval in Mechanical Engineering,” Des. Stud., 21(2), pp. 167–186. [CrossRef]
Nagel, J. K., Stone, R., and McAdams, D., 2010, “An Engineering-to-Biology Thesaurus for Engineering Design,” ASME Paper No. DETC2010-28233. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., and Nataraju, B. S., 2005, “A Functional Representation for Aiding in Biomimetic and Artificial Inspiration of New Ideas,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 19(2), pp. 113–132. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, A., 2009, “Design Creativity Research,” Product Research, N. R. Srinivasa Raghavan and J. A. Cafeo, eds., Springer Netherlands, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 17–39.
Yang, M. C., Wood, W. H., and Cutkosky, M. R., 2005, “Design Information Retrieval: A Thesauri-Base Approach for Reuse of Informal Design Information,” Eng. Comput., 21(2), pp. 177–192. [CrossRef]
Wood, W. H., Yang, M. C., Cutkosky, M. R., and Agogino, A. M., 1998, “Design Information Retrieval: Improving Access to the Informal Side of Design,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Atlanta, GA.
Yang, M. C., and Cutkosky, M. R., 1997, “Automated Indexing of Design Concepts for Information Management,” International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Schriftenreihe WDK, pp. 191–196.
Ahmed, S., 2005, “An Approach to Assist Designers With Their Queries and Designs,” ASME Paper No. DETC2006-99705. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J., Markman, A. B., and Wood, K. L., 2008, “WordTrees: A Method for Design-by-Analogy,” ASEE Annual Conference.
Linsey, J., Markman, A. B., and Wood, K. L., 2012, “Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 134(4), p. 041009. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J. S., Wood, K. L., and Markman, A. B., 2008, “Increasing Innovation: Presentation and Evaluation of the WordTree Design-by-Analogy Method,” ASME Paper No. DETC2008-49317. [CrossRef]
Segers, N. M., De Vries, B., and Achten, H. H., 2005, “Do Word Graphs Stimulate Design?,” Des. Stud., 26(6), pp. 625–647. [CrossRef]
Segers, N., and De Vries, B., 2003, “The Idea Space System: Words as Handles to a Comprehensive Data Structure,” 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, Digital Design—Research and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Verhaegen, P., D'hondt, J., Vandevenne, D., Dewulf, S., and Duflou, J. R., 2011, “Identifying Candidates for Design-by-Analogy,” Comput. Ind., 62(4), pp. 446–459. [CrossRef]
Gentner, D., 1981, “Some Interesting Differences Between Verbs and Nouns,” Cognit. Brain Theory, 4(2), pp. 161–178.
Chiu, I., and Shu, L. H., 2007, “Using Language as Related Stimuli for Concept Generation,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 21(2), pp. 103–121. [CrossRef]
Kang, I., Na, S., Kim, J., and Lee, J., 2007, “Cluster-Based Patent Retrieva,” Inform. Process. Manage., 43(5), pp. 1173–1182. [CrossRef]
Trippe, A. J., 2003, “Patinformatics: Tasks to Tools,” World Pat. Inform., 25(3), pp. 211–221. [CrossRef]
Tseng, Y., Lin, C., and Lin, Y., 2007, “Test Mining Techniques for Patent Analysis,” Inf. Process. Manage., 43(5), pp. 1216–1247. [CrossRef]
Altshuller, G. S., and Shapiro, R. B., 1956, “О Психологии изобретательского творчества (On the Psychology of Inventive Creation),” Вопросы Психологии (Psychol. Issues), 6, pp. 37–39 (in Russian).
Zhang, R., Cha, J., and Lu, Y., 2007, “A Conceptual Design Model Using Axiomatic Design, Functional Basis and TRIZ,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE IEEM, Singapore, pp. 1807–1810. [CrossRef]
Cascini, G., and Russo, D., 2007, “Computer-Aided Analysis of Patents and Search for TRIZ Contradictions,” Int. J. Prod. Dev., 4(1/2), pp. 52–67. [CrossRef]
Souili, A., Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., and Zanni, C., 2011, “Starting From Patents to Find Inputs to the Problem Graph Model of IDM-TRIZ,” TRIZ Future 2011, Dublin, Ireland.
Souili, A., and Cavallucci, D., 2012, “Toward an Automatic Extraction of IDM Concepts From Patents,” CIRP Design, Bangalore, India, Apr. 28–30.
Fu, K., “Discovering and Exploring Structure in Design Databases and Its Role in Stimulating Design by Analogy,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Fu, K., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K., and Wood, K., 2013, “Discovering Structure in Design Databases Through Function and Surface Based Mapping,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 135(3), p. 031006 [CrossRef]
Szykman, S., Sriram, R. D., Bochenek, C., Racz, J. W., and Senfaute, J., 2000, “Design Repositories: Engineering Design's New Knowledge Base,” IEEE Intell. Syst., 15, pp. 48–55. [CrossRef]
Koch, S., Bosch, H., Giereth, M., and Ertl, T., 2009, “Iterative Integration of Visual Insights during Patent Search and Analysis,” IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Atlantic City, NJ, pp. 203–210. [CrossRef]
Mukherjea, S., Bhuvan, B., and Kankar, P., 2005, “Information Retrieval and Knowledge Discovery Utilizing a BioMedical Patent Semantic Web,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17(8), pp. 1099–1110. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., Agrawal, R., and Raghavan, P., 1998, “Scalable Feature Selection, Classification and Signature Generation for Organizing Large Text Databases Into Hierarchical Topic Taxonomies,” VLDB J., 7(3), pp. 163–178. [CrossRef]
Duran-Novoa, R., Leon-Rovira, N., Aguayo-Tellez, H., and Said, D., 2011, “Inventive Problem Solving Based on Dialectical Negation, Using Evolutionary Algorithms and TRIZ Heuristics,” Comput. Ind., 62(4), pp. 437–445. [CrossRef]
Hernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., and Okudan, G. E., 2012, “Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ,” ASME Paper No. DETC2012-70294. 10.1115/DETC2012-70294 [CrossRef]
Hernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., and Okudan, G. E., 2012, “Experimental Assessment of TRIZ Effectiveness in Idea Generation,” ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX.
Krasnoslobodtsev, V., and Langevin, R., 2005, “TRIZ Application in Development of Climbing Robots,” First TRIZ Symposium, Japan.
Liang, Y., Tan, R., and Ma, J., 2008, “Patent Analysis With Text Mining for TRIZ,” IEEE ICMIT, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1147–1151. [CrossRef]
Nakagawa, T., 2012, “Creative Problem-Solving Methodologies TRIZ/USIT: Overview of My 14 Years in Research, Education, and Promotion,” The Bulletin of the Cultural and Natural Sciences in Osaka Gakuin University, Vol. 64.
Nix, A. A., Sherret, B., and Stone, R. B., 2011, “A Function Based Approach to TRIZ,” ASME Paper No. DETC2011-47973. [CrossRef]
Houssin, R., and Coulibaly, A., 2011, “An Approach to Solve Contradiction Problems for Safety Integration in Innovative Design Process,” Comput. Ind., 62(4), pp. 398–406. [CrossRef]
Mann, D., Dewulf, S., Zlotin, B., and Zusman, A., 2003, Matrix 2003, Updating the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix, CREAX, Kurtrijk, Belgium.
CREAX, 2012, “CREAX: Creativity for Innovation,” http://www.creax.com
Goldfire, I. M., 2012, “Invention Machine Goldfire: Unleashing the Power of Research,” Available: http://inventionmachine.com/products-and-services/innovation-software/goldfire-Research/
Bhatta, S., and Goel, A., 1996, “From Design Experiences to Generic Mechanisms: Model-Based Learning in Analogical Design,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 10(2), pp. 131–136. [CrossRef]
Chiu, I., and Shu, L. H., 2005, “Bridging Cross-Domain Terminology for Biomimetic Design,” ASME Paper No. DETC2005-84908. [CrossRef]
Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyreva, N. R., Bowyer, A., and Pahl, A. K., 2006, “Biomimetics: Its Practice and Theory,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 3(9), pp. 471–482. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Salton, G., and McGill, M. J., 1986, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
van Rijsbergen, C. J., 1979, Information Retrieval, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
Rindflesch, T. C., 1996, “Natural Language Processing,” Ann. Rev. Appl. Linguist., 16, pp. 70–85. [CrossRef]
Moldovan, A., Bot, R. I., and Wanka, G., 2005, “Latent Semantic Indexing for Patent Documents,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 15, pp. 551–560. [CrossRef]
Dumais, S. T., 1995, “Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI): TREC-3 Report,” Proceedings of TREC.
Porter, M. F., 1980, “An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping,” Program, 14(3), pp. 130–137. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., and Markman, A. B., 2011, “An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(3), p. 031008. [CrossRef]
Osborn, A., 1957, Applied Imagination, Scribner, New York, NY.
Markman, A. B., and Wood, K. L., 2009, Tools for Innovation: The Science Behind Practical Methods that Drive New Ideas, Oxford University, New York, NY.
Vangundy, A. B., 1988, Techniques of Structured Problem Solving, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, NY.
McAdams, D., and Wood, K., 2002, “A Quantitative Similarity Metric for Design by Analogy,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(2), pp. 173–182. [CrossRef]
Murphy, J. T., 2011, “Patent-Based Analogy Search Tool for Innovative Concept Generation,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Fu, K., Murphy, J., Yang, M., Otto, K., Jensen, D., and Wood, K. L., 2013, “Investigating the Effect of Functionality Level of Analogical Stimulation on Design Outcomes,” Korea-Japan Design Engineering Workshops (DEWS), Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan, Nov. 28–30.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Overview of the functional analogy search development

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Knowledge database processing involves parsing, tokenizing, and stemming textual content of 65,000 random patents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Functional vocabulary generation involves checking for convergence of functional terms, defining function regimes using zipf's law, and using wordnet/thesaurus to perform affinity mapping, defining functional vocabulary hierarchy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cumulative functions versus number of patents indexed with horizontal asymptote at ∼1700 functions and 61,000 patents verifying convergence of function vocabulary

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Term-document frequency versus order, showing the frequency falls below a 1% threshold (occur in <∼45,000 patents)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Function vocabulary document frequency versus rank order comparison with zipf's power law distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Query formulation and evaluation involves creating a sample patent database of 275,000 patents, defining how to build query vectors for chosen primary and secondary functions, and establishing a relevancy scoring for any patent in the database to a given functional query

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Query generator user interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Information retrieval and data clustering involves entering desired primary and secondary functions into query generator, exploring top 500 patents in search result viewer clustered by uspto patent class, viewed in PDF form with online patent database website

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Search result viewer showing average total relevancy score for patent class and individual total relevancy score for identified patents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Integration into design process involves input from user generated functional modeling of design problem into patent analogy search, use as one of many possible design inspiration methods/aids during concept generation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Black box functional model (top) and simplified functional model (bottom) of core functionality for an automated window washer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Patent analogy search results. (a) Automated window cleaning device, an example of a near-field analogy (Patent No. 5,086,533), (b) automated floor cleaning device, an example of a far-field analogy (Patent No. 6,883,201), (c) transportable elevator system for vertically traversing buildings under construction (Patent No. 5,033,586).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Simplified functional model of a guitar pickup winder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Search results for pickup winder generic functions showing fruit peeler analogy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Illustrations from analogous patents for the pickup winder. (a) U.S. Patent No. 5,105,735: perfected machine for peeling oranges and similar fruits, (b) U.S. Patent No. 5,121,888: spinning reel with a spool disengageable from a rear-mounted drag, (c) U.S. Patent No. 3,577,684: abrading machine with steering roll and tensioned abrading belt.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Wire tension control analogy solution, U.S. Patent No. 5,038,657

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In