Research Papers

Evaluating the Directed Intuitive Approach for Bioinspired Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael W. Glier

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: glierm@tamu.edu

Joanna Tsenn

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: joanna.tsenn@tamu.edu

Julie S. Linsey

Assistant Professor
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: julie.linsey@me.gatech.edu

Daniel A. McAdams

Associate Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: dmcadams@tamu.edu

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received October 2, 2013; final manuscript received January 14, 2014; published online May 12, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Janis Terpenny.

J. Mech. Des 136(7), 071012 (May 12, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1440; doi: 10.1115/1.4026825 History: Received October 02, 2013; Revised January 14, 2014

Bioinspired design, the practice of looking to nature to find inspiration for solutions to engineering problems, is increasingly a desired approach to design. It allows designers to tap a wealth of time-tested solutions to difficult problems in a domain less considered by designers. Only recently have researchers developed organized, systematic methods for bioinspired design. Traditionally, bioinspired design has been conducted without the benefit of any organized method. Designers relied on the informal “directed intuitive approach” of bioinspired design, which simply directs designers to consider how nature might solve a problem. This paper presents an experiment to explore the impact of the directed approach on idea generation. This experiment is foundationally important to bioinspired engineering design method research. The results of this experiment serve as a fundamental baseline and benchmark for the comparison of more systematic, and often more involved, bioinspired design methods. A group of 121 novice designers are given one of two design problems and instructed to either generate solutions using the directed approach or to generate solutions without being prompted in any additional fashion. Based on the findings presented here, the directed approach offers designers no advantage in the average number of nonredundant ideas, quality, novelty, or variety of the solutions produced. In conclusion, systematic and organized methods for bioinspired design should be sought to effectively leverage nature's design knowledge.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Jenkins, C. H., 2012, Bio-Inspired Engineering, Momentum Press, New York.
Krieger, K., 2004, “Do Pool Sharks Swim Faster?,”Science, 305(5684), pp. 636–637. [CrossRef]
Biomimicry Institute, 2009, “Learning From Humpback Whales How to Create Wind Power,” http://www.biomimicryinstitute.org/case-studies/case-studies/energy.html
Vincent, J., Bogatyreva, O., and Bogatyrev, N., 2006, “Biology Doesn't Waste Energy—That's Really Smart,”Proc. SPIE, 6168, pp. 61680-1–616801-9. [CrossRef]
Vincent, J. F. V., and Mann, D. L., 2002, “Systematic Technology Transfer From Biology to Engineering,”Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 360(1791), pp. 159–173. [CrossRef]
Biomimicry Guild, 2010, “A Conversation With Janine Benyus,” http://www.biomimicryguild.com/janineinterview.html
Biomimicry Institute, 2012, “What is Biomimicry,” http://www.biomimicryinstitute.org/about-us/what-is-biomimicry.html
Gordon, W. J., 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, Harper & Brothers, Oxford, UK.
French, M. J., 1988, Invention and Evolution: Design in Nature and Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Dahmus, J., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., and Otto, K., “Modular Product Architecture,” Proc. Proceedings of DETC2000.
Dieter, G. E., and Schmidt, L. C., 2009, Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, St. Louis, MO.
Dym, C., and Little, P., 2004, Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction, John Wiley & Sons, Hobokin, NJ.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K. H., 2007, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer Verlag, London.
Dahmus, J., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., and Otto, K., 2001, “Modular Product Architecture,”Des. Stud., 22(5), pp. 409–424. [CrossRef]
Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., and Pahl, A.-K., 2006, “Biomimetics: Its Practice and Theory,”J. R. Soc., Interface, 3, pp. 471–482. [CrossRef]
Altshuller, G., and Rodman, S., 1999, The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity, Technical Innovation Center Inc., Worcester, MA.
Nagel, J. K. S., Nagel, R. L., Stone, R. B., and McAdams, D. A., 2010, “Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf., 24(4), pp. 521–535. [CrossRef]
Tinsley, A., Midha, P. A., Nagel, R. L., McAdams, D. A., Stone, R. B., and Shu, L. H., 2008, “Exploring the Use of Functional Models as a Foundation for Biomimetic Conceptual Design,” Design Engineering Technical Conference 2007, Las Vegas, NV, September 4–7, 2007. Paper No. DETC2007-35604 (DTM).
Nagel, J. K. S., Stone, R. B., and McAdams, D. A., 2010, “Exploring the Use of Category and Scale to Scope a Biological Functional Model,” ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering ConferenceMontreal, Quebec, Canada.
Chiu, I., and Shu, L. H., 2004, “Natural Language Analysis for Biomimetic Design,” Design Engineering Technical Conference 2004, Salt Lake City, UT.
Nagel, J., Stone, R., and McAdams, D. A., 2010, “An Engineering-to-Biology Thesaurus for Engineering Design,” International Design Engineering Technical Conference 2010.
Shu, L. H., 2010, “A Natural-Language Approach to Biomimetic Design,”Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf., 24(4), pp. 507–519. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., and Nataraju, B., 2005, “A Functional Representation for Aiding Biomimetic and Artificial Inspiration of New Ideas,”Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf., 19(2), pp. 113–132. [CrossRef]
Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., Helms, M., Goel, A., and Yen, J., 2010, “DANE: Fostering Creativity in and Through Biologically Inspired Design,” Proceedings of First International Conference on Design Creativity, Kobe, Japan.
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., and Nataraju, B., 2005, “A Behavioural Model for Representing Biological and Artificial Systems for Inspiring Novel Designs,” Proc. ICED 05: 15th International Conference on Engineering Design: Engineering Design and the Global Economy, Engineers Australia, p. 1093.
Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., and Vargas-Hernandez, N., 2003, “Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness,”Des. Stud., 24(2), pp. 111–134. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J., Green, M. G., Murphy, J., Wood, K. L., and Markman, A. B., 2005, “Collaborating to Success: An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference 2005 Long Beach, CA, pp. 24–28.
Hyman, B., 1998, Fundamentals of Engineering Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Otto, K., and Wood, K. L., 2001, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design, and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D., 2004, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston, MA.
Bar Cohen, Y., 2003, Biologically Inspired Intelligent Robots, C. Breazeal ed, SPIE Technical Publications, Bellingham, WA.
Center for Biologically Inspired Design, 2012, http://www.cbid.gatech.edu
Bruck, H. A., Gershon, A. L., Golden, I., Gupta, S. K., Gyger, Jr., L. S., Magrab, E. B., and Spranklin, B. W., 2007, “Training Mechanical Engineering Students to Utilize Biological Inspiration During Product Development,”Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2(4), pp. S198–S209. [CrossRef]
Jenkins, C. H., 2011, “Doing BiE: Lessons Learned From Teaching Bio-Inspired Engineering,” IMECE2011, pp. 1–5.
Vincent, J. F. V., 1982, Structural Biomaterials, Wiley, New York.
Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., and Wood, K., 2002, “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts,”Res. Eng. Des., 13(2), pp. 65–82.
Chiu, I., and Shu, L. H., 2005, “Bridging Cross-Domain Terminology for Biomimetic Design,” Design Engineering Technical Conference 2005, Long Beach, CA.
Chiu, I., and Shu, L. H., 2007, “Biomimetic Design Through Natural Language Analysis to Facilitate Cross-Domain Information Retrieval,”Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf., 21(1), pp. 45–59. [CrossRef]
Cheong, H., Shu, L., Stone, R., and McAdams, D., 2008, “Translating Terms of the Functional Basis into Biologically Meaningful Keywords,” Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2008, New York.
Srinivasan, V., and Chakrabarti, A., 2009, “Sapphire—An Approach to Analysis and Synthesis,” ICED09.
Stroble, J. K., Stone, R. B., and McAdams, D. A., 2009, “Conceptualization of Biomimetic Sensors Through Functional Representation of Natural Sensing Solutions,” Proc. ICED 09: 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 53–64.
Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., Helms, M., Goel, A. K., and Yen, J., “Biologically-Inspired Innovation in Engineering Design: A Cognitive Study,” Proceedings of ICDS2010.
Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K., and Seepersad, C., 2010, “An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY.
Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., and Markman, A. B., 2011, “An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods,”ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(3), p. 031008. [CrossRef]
Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G., 1977, “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,”Biometrics, 31(10), pp. 159–174. [CrossRef]
Wilson, J. O., Nelson, B. A., Rosen, D., and Yen, J., 2010, “The Effects of Biological Examples in Idea Generation,”Des. Stud., 31(2), pp. 169–186. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

This page shows two separate solutions: a shirt and nose plugs. The participant indicated that the solutions were separate with numbers and headings.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) (top) and (b) (bottom). Two examples of a vibrating wristwatch alarm clock with different levels of detail.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Three-point rating scale for evaluating quality

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The average number of non-redundant ideas generated by individuals in each group (±1 SE)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The average quality rating of solutions generated by individuals in each group (±1 SE)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The average novelty score for the solutions generated by individuals in each group (±1 SE)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The average variety score for the solutions produced by designers in each group (±1 SE)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In