0
Research Papers

Design and Validation of a Compatible 3-Degrees of Freedom Shoulder Exoskeleton With an Adaptive Center of Rotation

[+] Author and Article Information
Hua Yan

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power
Transmission and Control,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: wereyh@zju.edu.cn

Canjun Yang

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power
Transmission and Control,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: ycj@zju.edu.cn

Yansong Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power
Transmission and Control,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: zyansld@163.com

Yiqi Wang

State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power
Transmission and Control,
Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310027, China
e-mail: jialeng@zju.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 4, 2013; final manuscript received March 19, 2014; published online April 28, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Matthew B. Parkinson.

J. Mech. Des 136(7), 071006 (Apr 28, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1064; doi: 10.1115/1.4027284 History: Received February 04, 2013; Revised March 19, 2014

This paper outlines an experimentally based design method for a compatible 3-DOF shoulder exoskeleton with an adaptive center of rotation (CoR) by matching the mechanical CoR with the anatomical CoR to reduce human–machine interaction forces and improve comfort during dynamic humeral motion. The spatial–temporal description for anatomical CoR motion is obtained via a specific experimental task conducted on six healthy subjects. The task is comprised of a static section and a dynamic section, both of which are recorded with an infrared motion capture system using body-attached markers. To reduce the influence of human soft tissues, a custom-made four-marker group block was placed on the upper arm instead of using discrete markers. In the static section, the position of anatomical CoR is kept stationary and calculated using a well-known functional method. Based on the static results, the dynamic section determines the statistical relationship between the dynamic CoR position and the humeral orientation using an optimization method when subjects move their upper arm freely in the sagittal and coronal planes. Based on the resolved anatomical CoR motion, a new mechanical CoR model derived from a traditional ball-and-socket joint is applied to match the experimental results as closely as possible. In this mechanical model, the CoR motion in three-dimensional space is adjusted by translating two of the three intersecting joint axes, including the shoulder abduction/adduction and flexion/extension. A set of optimal translation parameters is obtained through proper matching criterion for the two CoRs. Based on the translation parameters, a compatible shoulder exoskeleton was manufactured and compared with a traditional shoulder exoskeleton with a fixed CoR. An experimental test was conducted to validate the CoR motion adaptation ability by measuring the human–machine interaction force during passive shoulder joint motion. The results provide a promising direction for future anthropomorphic shoulder exoskeleton design.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hogfors, C., Peterson, B., Sigholm, G., and Herberts, P., 1991, “Biomechanical Model of the Human Shoulder Joint—II. The Shoulder Rhythm,” J. Biomech., 24(8), pp. 699–709. [CrossRef]
Perry, J. C., Rosen, J., and Burns, S., 2007, “Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Desing,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech., 12(4), pp. 408–417. [CrossRef]
Sugar, T. G., He, J., Koeneman, E. J., Koeneman, J. B., Herman, R., Huang, H., Schultz, R. S., Herring, D., Wanberg, J., and Balasubramanian, S., 2007, “Design and Control of RUPERT: A Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 15(3), pp. 336–346. [CrossRef]
Caldwell, D. G., Tsagarakis, N., Kousidou, S., Costa, N., and Sarakoglou, I., 2007, “‘Soft’ Exoskeleton for Upper and Lower Body Rehabilitation–Design, Control, and Testing,” Int. J. Hum. Rob., 4(3), pp. 549–574. [CrossRef]
Schiele, A., and Van Der Helm, F. C. T., 2006, “Kinematic Design to Improve Ergonomics in Human Machine Interaction,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 14(4), pp. 456–469. [CrossRef]
Wu, G., Van DerHelm, F. C. T., Veeger, H., Makhsous, M., Van Roy, P., Anglin, C., Nagels, J., Karduna, A. R., Mcquade, K., and Wang, X., 2005, “ISB Recommendation on Definitions of Joint Coordinate Systems of Various Joints for the Reporting of Human Joint Motion—Part II: Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, and Hand,” J. Biomech., 38(5), pp. 981–992. [CrossRef]
Morrow, M. M. B., Kaufman, K. R., and An, K. N., 2011, “Scapula Kinematics and Associated Impingement Risk in Manual Wheelchair Users During Propulsion and a Weight Relief Lift,” Clin. Biomech., 26(4), pp. 352–357. [CrossRef]
Hingtgen, B., Mcguire, J. R., Wang, M., and Harris, G. F., 2006, “An Upper Extremity Kinematic Model for Evaluation of Hemiparetic Stroke,” J. Biomech., 39(4), pp. 681–688. [CrossRef]
Harryman, D. T., Sidles, J. A., Harris, S. L., Lippitt, S. B., and Matsen, F. A., 1995, “The Effect of Articular Conformity and the Size of the Humeral Head Component on Laxity and Motion after Glenohumeral Arthroplasty—A Study in Cadavera,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am., 77(4), pp. 555–563. Available at: http://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=22935
Poppen, N., and Walker, P., 1976, “Normal and Abnormal Motion of the Shoulder,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am., 58(2), pp. 195–201. [CrossRef]
Karduna, A. R., 2001, “Direct 3-Dimensional Measurement of Scapular Kinematics During Dynamic Movements in vivo,” J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 10(3), pp. 269–277. [CrossRef]
Camomilla, V., Cereatti, A., Vannozzi, G., and Cappozzo, A., 2006, “An Optimized Protocol for Hip Joint Centre Determination Using the Functional Method,” J. Biomech., 39(6), pp. 1096–1106. [CrossRef]
Lempereur, M., Leboeuf, F., Brochard, S., Rousset, J., Burdin, V., and Rémy-Néris, O., 2010, “In vivo Estimation of the Glenohumeral Joint Centre by Functional Methods: Accuracy and Repeatability Assessment,” J. Biomech., 43(2), pp. 370–374. [CrossRef]
Gamage, S. S., and Lasenby, J., 2002, “New Least Squares Solutions for Estimating the Average Centre of Rotation and the Axis of Rotation,” J. Biomech., 35(1), pp. 87–93. [CrossRef]
Halvorsen, K., 2003, “Bias Compensated Least Squares Estimate of the Center of Rotation,” J. Biomech., 36(7), pp. 999–1008. [CrossRef]
Ehrig, R. M., Taylor, W. R., Duda, G. N., and Heller, M. O., 2006, “A Survey of Formal Methods for Determining the Centre of Rotation of Ball Joints,” J. Biomech., 39(15), pp. 2798–2809. [CrossRef]
Chang, J. H., Hsu, A. T., and Chang, G. L., 2008, “In vitro Estimation of Glenohumeral Joint Center of Rotation,” J. Med. Biol. Eng., 28(4), pp. 191–195. Available at: http://jmbe.bme.ncku.edu.tw/index.php/bme/article/viewArticle/306
Woltring, H., Huiskes, R., De Lange, A., and Veldpaus, F., 1985, “Finite Centroid and Helical Axis Estimation From Noisy Landmark Measurements in the Study of Human Joint Kinematics,” J. Biomech., 18(5), pp. 379–389. [CrossRef]
Frisoli, A., Salsedo, F., Bergamasco, M., Rossi, B., and Carboncini, M. C., 2009, “A Force-Feedback Exoskeleton for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation in Virtual Reality,” Appl. Bionics Biomech., 6(2), pp. 115–126. [CrossRef]
Kobayashi, H., Suzuki, H., Iba, M., and Hasegawa, S., 2006, “Development of a Shoulder Mechanism for a Muscle Suit Supporting Upper Limb Motion and Proposal of a Posture Control Method,” Trans. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng., 42(4), pp. 376–385. Available at: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sicetr1965/42/4/42_4_376/_article
Zhang, J., Fu, H., Dong, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, C., and Chen, Y., 2008, “Novel 6-DOF Wearable Exoskeleton Arm With Pneumatic Force-Feedback for Bilateral Teleoperation,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 21(3), pp. 58–65. [CrossRef]
Mihelj, M., Nef, T., and Riener, R., 2007, “A Novel Paradigm for Patient-Cooperative Control of Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robots,” Adv. Rob., 21(8), pp. 843–867. [CrossRef]
Gijbels, D., Lamers, I., Kerkhofs, L., Alders, G., Knippenberg, E., and Feys, P., 2011, “The Armeo Spring as Training Tool to Improve Upper Limb Functionality in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 8(5), pp. 223–230. [CrossRef]
Stienen, A. H. A., Hekman, E. E. G., Van Der Helm, F. C. T., and Van Der Kooij, H., 2009, “Self-Aligning Exoskeleton Axes Through Decoupling of Joint Rotations and Translations,” IEEE Trans. Rob., 25(3), pp. 628–633. [CrossRef]
Mihelj, M., Nef, T., and Riener, R., 2007, “ARMin II–7 DoF Rehabilitation Robot: Mechanics and Kinematics,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, pp. 4120–4125.
Carignan, C., Tang, J., and Roderick, S., 2009, “Development of an Exoskeleton Haptic Interface for Virtual Task Training,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, pp. 3697–3702.
Ball, S. J., Brown, I. E., and Scott, S. H., 2007, “Medarm: A Rehabilitation Robot With 5DOF at the Shoulder Complex,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, ETH Zurich, pp. 1–6.
Park, H. S., Ren, Y., and Zhang, L. Q., 2008, “Intelliarm: An Exoskeleton for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Neurological Impairments,” Proceedings of 2008 IEEE RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Scottsdale, pp. 109–114.
Nef, T., Guidali, M., and Riener, R., 2009, “ARMin III–Arm Therapy Exoskeleton With an Ergonomic Shoulder Actuation,” Appl. Bionics Biomech., 6(2), pp. 127–142. [CrossRef]
Doorenbosch, C. A. M., Harlaar, J., and Veeger, D., 2003, “The Globe System: An Unambiguous Description of Shoulder Positions in Daily Life Movements,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 40(2), pp. 147–156. [CrossRef]
Cave, E. F., and Roberts, S. M., 1936, “A Method for Measuring and Recording Joint Function,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., 18(2), pp. 455–465. Available at: http://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=8431
Gao, B., Conrad, B., and Zheng, N., 2007, “Comparison of Skin Error Reduction Techniques for Skeletal Motion Analysis,” J. Biomech., 40(2), pp. 551–551. [CrossRef]
Inman, V. T., and Abbott, L. R. C., 1944, “Observations on the Function of the Shoulder Joint,” J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am., 26(1), pp. 1–30. Available at: http://jbjs.org/article.aspx?articleid=10010
More, J., 1978, “The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm: Implementation and Theory,” Numer. Anal., 630, pp. 105–116. [CrossRef]
Lenzi, T., Vitiello, N., Rossi, S. M. M. D., Persichetti, A., Giovacchini, F., Roccella, S., Vecchi, F., and Carrozza, M. C., 2011, “Measuring Human–Robot Interaction on Wearable Robots: A Distributed Approach,” Mechatronics, 21(6), pp. 1123–1131. [CrossRef]
Medical Research Council, 1976, Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System, HMSO, London.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Bones and joints of the shoulder complex

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Marker location on the human body

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Coordinate systems and vectors of one marker on an arm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Diagrams of the CoR position during humerus lifting movements in the sagittal plane (a) and coronal plane (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Translation of the axes for abduction/adduction (X) and flexion/extension (Z), (b) flexion around a new axis (Z′), (c) abduction around a new axis (X′), and (d) new CoR position C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Three-dimensional description of the mechanical CoR (point C) motion under different translation parameters. (a) α0 = 270 deg, ρ0 = 1 cm and α1 = 90 deg, ρ1 = 1 cm and (b) α0 = 180 deg, ρ0 = 1 cm and α1 = 135 deg, ρ1 = 2 cm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Matching between the mechanical CoR motion (grid) calculated using the optimal translation parameters and the anatomical CoR motion (red and blue lines) obtained in the experimental task

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Shoulder exoskeleton and subject in experimental test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Exploded view of the semi-circular guide rail

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Interaction force comparison between the new and traditional exoskeleton robots

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In