Research Papers

Effects of Product Attributes in Case-Based Reasoning Methods for Cost Estimation and Cost Uncertainty Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Shun Takai

Department of Technology,
Northern Illinois University,
DeKalb, IL 60115
e-mail: stakai@niu.edu

Karan Banga

Cummins, Inc.,
Whitakers, NC 27891
e-mail: karan.banga@cummins.com

1Corresponding autor.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received May 19, 2013; final manuscript received February 10, 2014; published online March 21, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Bernard Yannou.

J. Mech. Des 136(5), 051005 (Mar 21, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: MD-13-1215; doi: 10.1115/1.4026869 History: Received May 19, 2013; Revised February 10, 2014

This paper presents case-based reasoning methods for cost estimation and cost uncertainty modeling that may help designers select a new product concept at the early stage of product development. The case-based reasoning methods without cost adjustment (CBR) and with cost adjustment (CBR-A) are compared with analogy-based cost estimation (ABCE) and multivariate linear regression analysis (RA). Under the conditions studied in the illustrative example of this paper (i.e., a single knowledge base, sport utility vehicle (SUV) concepts, and up to five concept attributes), leave-one-out cross-validation results indicate that both CBR-A and RA accurately estimate cost and reliably model cost uncertainty; and optimum attribute sets for the most accurate cost estimation and the most reliable cost uncertainty modeling are different in all methods. The results of this paper indicate that designers may need to carefully select attribute sets by analyzing trade-offs between the accuracy of cost estimation and the reliability of cost uncertainty modeling when product cost is used as a criterion to select concepts.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cost estimation using case-based reasoning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Example dendrogram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Portion of the complete knowledge base

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Portion of the modified knowledge base

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Portion of the standardized knowledge base

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dendrograms for automobile retrieval

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Automobile selection criteria graphs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Cost distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. A1

Comparison of various approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. A2

Leave-one-out cross-validation result




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In