0
Research Papers

Design and Experimental Validation of Compact, Quick-Response Shape Memory Alloy Separation Device

[+] Author and Article Information
Xiaoyong Zhang

e-mail: zhangyong9119@163.com

Xiaojun Yan

e-mail: yanxiaojun@buaa.edu.cn
School of Energy and Power Engineering
Beihang University,
Xueyuan Road No. 37,
Haidian District,
Beijing 100191, China

Qiaolong Yang

China Academy of Space Technology,
Youyi Road,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: yang_qiao_long@hotmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Innovation and Devices of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received November 14, 2012; final manuscript received October 9, 2013; published online November 26, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Diann Brei.

J. Mech. Des 136(1), 011009 (Nov 26, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1560; doi: 10.1115/1.4025795 History: Received November 14, 2012; Revised October 09, 2013

The shape memory alloy (SMA)-actuated separation devices that are currently used in small satellites were usually designed to handle large separation loads. As a result, they have complex structures, large footprints, and high power consumptions. In this paper, we report a simpler and more compact separation device. A design methodology for the load-shifting SMA actuator (LSSA) used in a device was developed. Four prototypes were fabricated and tested to demonstrate the design concept and the LSSA design methodology. Experiments showed that this separation device has the merits of a quick response time, compact size, and simple structure, which give it potential for small-satellite applications.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lin, L. X., 1997, “Modern Small Satellites and Its Key Technology,” Technical Report No. DTIC Document.
Peffer, A., Fosness, E., Hill, S., Gammill, W., and Sciulli, D., 2000, “Development and Transition of Low-Shock Spacecraft Release Devices for Small Satellites,” 14th Annual/USU Conference on Small Satellites, SSC00-XI-5, pp. 1–9.
Spaggiari, A., and Dragoni, E., 2011, “Multiphysics Modeling and Design of Shape Memory Alloy Wave Springs as Linear Actuators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(6), p. 061008. [CrossRef]
Calkins, F. T., and Mabe, J. H., 2010, “Shape Memory Alloy Based Morphing Aerostructures,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(11), p. 111012. [CrossRef]
Ganesh, N. J., Maniprakash, S., Chandrasekaran, L., Srinivasan, S. M., and Srinivasa, A. R., 2011, “Design and Development of a Sun Tracking Mechanism Using the Direct SMA Actuation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(7), p. 075001. [CrossRef]
Georges, T., Brailovski, V., Morellon, E., Coutu, D., and Terriault, P., 2009, “Design of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators for Morphing Laminar Wing With Flexible Extrados,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(9), p. 091006. [CrossRef]
Tuszynski, A., 2002, “Alternatives to Pyrotechnics—Nitinol Release Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 36th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, Glenn Research Center, May 15–17, NASA/CP—2002-211506, pp. 137–140.
Vázquez, J., and Bueno, J., 2001, “Non Explosive Low Shock Reusable 20 Kn Hold-Down Release Actuator,” Proceedings of the 9th European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium, 19–21 September 2001, Liège, Belgium, Compiled by R. A. Harris, ESA SP-480, Noordwijk, Netherlands, ESA Publications Division, pp. 131–136.
Christiansen, S., Tibbitts, S., and Dowen, D., 1999, “Fast Acting Non-Pyrotechnic 10 kn Separation Nut,” Space Mechanisms and Tribology, Proceedings of the 8th European Symposium, 29 September–1 October, 1999 in Toulouse, France, edited by D. Danesy, European Space Agency, ESA-SP, Vol. 438, 1999, pp. 323–328.
Yan, X., and Zhang, K., 2007, “Development of a Small Reusable Space Release Device Using SMA,” The 14th International Symposium on: Smart Structures and Materials & Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, Vol. 6529, p. 65290J.
Liang, C., and Rogers, C. A., 1997, “Design of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators,” J. Intell. Mater Syst. Struct., 8(4), pp. 303–313. [CrossRef]
Kim, W., Barnes, B. M., Luntz, J. E., and Brei, D. E., 2011, “Conglomerate Stabilization Curve Design Method for Shape Memory Alloy Wire Actuators With Cyclic Shakedown,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(11), p. 111010. [CrossRef]
Redmond, J. A., Brei, D., Luntz, J., Browne, A. L., Johnson, N. L., and Strom, K. A., 2010, “The Design and Experimental Validation of an Ultrafast Shape Memory Alloy Resettable (Smart) Latch,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132(6), p. 061007. [CrossRef]
Wada, K., and Liu, Y., 2005, “Shape Recovery of Niti Shape Memory Alloy under Various Pre-Strain and Constraint Conditions,” Smart Mater. Struct., 14, pp. S273–S286. [CrossRef]
Churchill, C. B., and Shaw, J. A., 2008, “Shakedown Response of Conditioned Shape Memory Alloy Wire,” Proceedings of the SPIE 15th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Vol. 6929, p. 69291F.
Li, Y., Mi, X., Tan, J., and Gao, B., 2009, “Thermo-Mechanical Cyclic Transformation Behavior of Ti-Ni Shape Memory Alloy Wire,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 509(1–2), pp. 8–13. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Operation stages of separation device: (a) pretrigger, (b) at trigger point, (c) at release point, and (d) after release

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Force balance of sleeve during operations: (a) before trigger point and (b) after release

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Design scheme of separation device

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic diagram of LSSA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

LSSA design concept

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Experimental load–displacement data for selected SMA wire

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Actuation curves of LSSA (experiment versus simulation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Influence of spring rate on output displacement of LSSA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Actuation curve depicting separation device's operation process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experimental setup for separation load test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Force analysis of nut segment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Experiment setup for LSSA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Prototypes of separation device

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Response time as function of separation force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Response time and required energy as function of power consumption

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Folded solar array simulator fastened by four devices on vibration table

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In