0
Research Papers

Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ

[+] Author and Article Information
Noe Vargas Hernandez

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Texas at El Paso,
El Paso, TX 79968
e-mail: nvargas@utep.edu

Linda C. Schmidt

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: lschmidt@umd.edu

Gül E. Okudan

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing
Engineering,
Penn State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: gek3@engr.psu.edu

Word English Dictionary, accessed online at dictionary.reference.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Education Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received May 1, 2012; final manuscript received June 23, 2013; published online September 11, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Janis Terpenny.

J. Mech. Des 135(10), 101009 (Sep 11, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1230; doi: 10.1115/1.4024976 History: Received May 01, 2012; Revised June 23, 2013

The objective of this paper is to present experimental results of a specific ideation method TRIZ (an abbreviation of a Russian acronym of “Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch” meaning theory of inventive problem solving) as compared to ad hoc methods used by students. It is critical to understand how and why TRIZ works as it can lead to improvements on how to teach this method, and also how to analyze ideation methods in general. Our hypothesis is that TRIZ improves the creativity level of subjects using it as observed in the produced design outcomes. The experiments were conducted simultaneously at two institutions: University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) and University of Maryland (UMD). The results were analyzed as part of an existing research partnership with Pennsylvania State University (PSU). The ideation task present here has been used in all three institutions; it is the redesign of a traffic light that uses light-emitting diodes (LED) instead of incandescent bulbs leading to snow build-up on the lights in certain climates as LED's generate less heat to melt the snow. UTEP and UMD student groups were tasked with redesigning the LED traffic lights to resolve this issue. The assessment was performed on the outcome (i.e., ideas generated) using quantity, novelty and variety as metrics. Numerical results of these metrics are shown along with conclusions based on observations of the experimental process. Data presented in this paper conclude that TRIZ does improve the ideation effectiveness metrics Novelty and Variety while slightly reducing Quantity when compared to a control group using ad hoc ideation methods.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

León-Rovira, N., Heredia-Escorza, Y., and Río, L., 2008, “Systematic Creativity, Challenge-Based Instruction and Active Learning: A Study of Its Impact on Freshman Engineering Students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 24(6), pp. 1051–1061. Available at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intjee/ijee/2008/00000024/00000006/art00003
Michalko, M., 1991, Thinkertoys, Ten Speed, Berkeley, CA.
Morrison, T., DeRocco, E. S., Maciejewski, B., McNelly, J., Giffi, C., and Carrick, G., 2011, Boiling Point? The Skills Gap in U.S. Manufacturing, Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, Washington, DC.
Hennessey, B. A., and Amabile, T. M., 2010, “Creativity,” Annual Review of Psychology 2010, 61, pp. 569–598. [CrossRef]
Kazerounian, K., and Foley, S., 2997, “Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(7), pp. 761–768. [CrossRef]
White, C., Talley, A., Jensen, D., Wood, K., Szmerekovsky, A., and Crawford, R., 2010, “From Brainstorming to C-Sketch to Principles of Historical Innovators: Ideation Techniques to Enhance Student Creativity,” Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20–23, Louisville, Kentucky.
Vargas Hernandez, N., Schmidt, L. C., Okudan, G., and Linsey, J., 2010, “Systematic Ideation Curriculum Effectiveness Investigation & Deployment to Enhance Design Learning,” Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2010 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug. 15–18, Paper No. DETC2010-28785.
Shah, J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., and Smith, S., 2003, “Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness,” Des. Stud., 24(2), pp. 111–134. [CrossRef]
Gordon, W. J. J., 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, Harper & Brothers, New York.
Howard, T. H., Culley, S. J., and Dekoninck, E., 2008, “Describing the Creative Design Process by the Integration of Engineering Design and Cognitive Psychology Literature,” Des. Stud., 29(2), pp. 160–180. [CrossRef]
Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., and Kotovsky, K., 2011, “On the Benefits and Pitfalls of Analogies for Innovative Design: Ideation Performance Based on Analogical Distance, Commonness, and Modality of Examples,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(8), p. 081004. [CrossRef]
Lopez, R., Linsey, J. S., and Smith, S. M., 2011, “Characterizing the Effect of Domain Distance in Design-by-Analogy,” Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2011 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Aug. 29–31, Washington, DC, Paper No. DETC2011-48428.
Ahmed, S., and Christensen, B. T., 2009, “An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 131(11), p. 111004. [CrossRef]
Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., and Markham, A. B., 2010, “An Experimental Study of Group Ideation Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133(3), p. 031008. [CrossRef]
Altshuller, G., and Shulyak, L., 2002, 40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Technical Innovation, Technical Innovation Center, Inc., Worcester, MA.
Orloff, M. A., 2006, Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ: A Practical Guide, Springer, New York.
Rantanen, K., and E.Domb, 2002, Simplified TRIZ: New Problem Solving Applications for Engineers & Manufacturing Professionals, St. Lucie;Times Mirror, London.
Raskin, A., 2003, ‘A Higher Plane of Problem-Solving,’ Business 2.0, June 2003, www.business2.com/b2/web/articles/0,17863,515713,00.html
Okudan, G. E., Ogot, M., and Shirwaiker, R., 2006, “An Investigation on the Effectiveness Design Ideation Using TRIZ,” Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006 Design Education Conference, Sept. 10–13, Philadelphia, PA.
Pham, D. T., and Liu, H., 2009, “An I-Ching-TRIZ-Inspired Approach to Design Concept Generation,” Proc. ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Aug. 30–Sept. 2, San Diego, CA, Paper No. DETC2009-86642.
Osborn, A.F., 1993, Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving, CEF Press, Hadley, MA.
Nakagawa, T., 2001, “Learning and Applying the Essence of TRIZ With Easier USIT Procedure,” ETRIA World Conference: TRIZ Future 2001, Nov. 7–9, Bath, UK, pp. 151–164.
Howard, T., Culley, S., and Dekoninck, E., 2008, “Creative Stimulations in Conceptual Design: An Analysis of Industrial Case Studies,” Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, Aug. 3–6, Brooklyn, New York, Paper No. DETC2008-49672.
Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 2007, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, London, England.
Shirwaiker, R., and Okudan, G. E., 2008, “TRIZ and Axiomatic Design: A Review of Case-Studies and a Proposed Synergistic Use,” J. Intell. Manuf., 19(1), pp. 33–47. [CrossRef]
ABC News, 2010, “Energy-Efficient Traffic Lights Can’t Melt Snow,” Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wirestory?id=9345450&page=2nn
Okudan, G. E., Chiu, M.-C., Lin, C., Schmidt, L., Vargas, N., and Linsey, J. “A Pilot Exploration of Systematic Ideation Methods and Tools on Design Learning,” Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Apr. 29th–May 1.
Vargas Hernandez, N., Okudan Kremer, G. E., and Schmidt, L., “Effectiveness Metrics for Ideation: Merging Genealogy Trees and Improving Novelty Metric,” Proceedings of International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (ASME-IDETC 2012), Aug. 15–18, Chicago, IL.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Overview of TRIZ steps and information flows (Adapted from Ref. [13])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimentation methodology applied across institutions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Handout developed to introduce the traffic light design task to students (paper from Ref. [26])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Sample genealogy tree diagram for function 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sample TRIZ solutions generated at UTEP and UMD that show the use of TRIZ principles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Sample sketches generated at UTEP with the TRIZ methodology using a change of geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Sample sketches generated at UTEP with the TRIZ methodology using a heating system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Traffic light redesign merged genealogy tree with idea counts for UTEP and UMD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Graphical summary of results

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In