Research Papers

Optimal Magnetorheological Damper Configuration Using the Taguchi Experimental Design Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Zekeriya Parlak

e-mail: zparlak@sakarya.edu.tr

Tahsin Engin

e-mail: engint@sakarya.edu.trDepartment of Mechanical Engineering,
Sakarya University,
Sakarya 54187, Turkey

İsmail Şahin

Vocational School of Akyazi,
Sakarya University,
Sakarya 54405, Turkey
e-mail: isahin@sakarya.edu.tr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Automation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received November 10, 2011; final manuscript received May 17, 2013; published online June 25, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Diann Brei.

J. Mech. Des 135(8), 081008 (Jun 25, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-11-1461; doi: 10.1115/1.4024719 History: Received November 10, 2011; Revised May 17, 2013

Magnetorheological (MR) dampers have attracted the interest of suspension designers and researchers because of their variable damping feature, mechanical simplicity, robustness, low power consumption and fast response. This study deals with the optimal configuration of an MR damper using the Taguchi experimental design approach. The optimal solutions of the MR damper are evaluated for the maximum dynamic range and the maximum damper force separately. The MR dampers are constrained in a cylindrical container defined by radius and height. The optimal damper configurations obtained from this study are fabricated and tested for verification. The verification tests show that the dampers provide the specified damper force and dynamic range.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hitchcock, G. H., 2002, “A Novel Magneto–Rhelogical Fluid Damper,” Master thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Mechanical Engineering University of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Wereley, N. M., and Pang, L., 1998, “Nondimensional Analysis of Semi–Active Electrorheological and Magnetorheological Dampers Using Approximate Parallel Plate Models,” Smart Mater. Struct., 7(5), pp. 732–743. [CrossRef]
Spencer, B. F., Jr., Yang, G., Carlson, J. D., and Sain, M. K., 1998, “Smart Dampers for Seismic Protection of Structures: A Full-Scale Study,” Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, pp. 417–426.
Jolly, M. R., Bender, J. W., And Carlson, J. D., 1999, “Properties and Applications of Commercial Magnetorheological Fluids,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 10(1), pp. 5–13.
Rosenfeld, N. C., and Wereley, N. M., 2004, “Volume-Constrained Optimization of Magnetorheological and Electrorheological Valves and Dampers,” Smart Mater. Struct., 13(6), pp. 1303–1313. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, Q. H., and Choi, S. B., 2009, “Dynamic Modeling of an Electrorheological Damper Considering the Unsteady Behavior of Electrorheological Fluid Flow,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18(5), p. 055016. [CrossRef]
Yang, L., Duan, F., and Eriksson, A., 2008, “Analysis of the Optimal Design Strategy of a Magnetorheological Smart Structure,” Smart Mater. Struct., 17(1), p. 015047. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, Q. H., Choi, S. B., and Wereley, N. M., 2008, “Optimal Design of Magnetorheological Valves via a Finite Element Method Considering Control Energy and a Time Constant,” Smart Mater. Struct., 17(2), p. 025024. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, Q. H., Han, Y. M., Choi, S. B., and Wereley, N. M., 2007, “Geometry Optimization of MR Valves Constrained in a Specific Volume Using the Finite Element Method,” Smart Mater. Struct., 16(6), p. 2242. [CrossRef]
Stanway, R., Sproston, J. L., and El-Wahed, A. K., 1999, “Applications of Electro-Rheological Fluids in Vibration Control: A Survey,” Smart Mater. Struct., 5(4), p. 464. [CrossRef]
Namuduri, C. S., Alexandridis, A. A., Madak, J., and Rule, D. S, 2001, “Magnetorheological Fluid Damper With Multiple Annular Flow Gaps,” U.S. Patent6,279,701.
Delivorias, R. P., 2004, “Application of ER and MR Fluid in an Automotive Crash Energy Absorber,” MT0418, Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven.
Zhang, H. H., Liao, C. R., Chen, W. M., Huang, S. L., 2006, “A Magnetic Design Method of MR Fluid Dampers and FEM Analysis on Magnetic Saturation,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct., 17(8–9), pp. 813–818. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, Q. H., and Choi, S. B., 2009, “Optimal Design of MR Shock Absorber and Application to Vehicle Suspension,” Smart Mater. Struct., 18(3), p. 035012. [CrossRef]
Karakoc, K., Park, E. J., and Suleman, A., 2008, “Design Considerations for an Automotive Magnetorheological Brake,” Mechatronics, 18(8), pp. 434–447. [CrossRef]
Grunwald, A., and Olabi, A. G., 2008, “Design of Magneto-Rheological (MR) Valve,” Sens. Actuators, A, 148(1), pp. 211–223. [CrossRef]
Tonoli, A., Amati, N., Bonfitto, A., Silvagni, M., Staples, B., and Karpenko, E., 2010, “Design of Electromagnetic Dampers for Aero-Engine Applications,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(11), p. 112501. [CrossRef]
Case, D., Taheri, B., and Richer, E., 2011, “Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Magnetorheological Dampers,” ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vol. 7, Dynamic Systems and Control; Mechatronics and Intelligent Machines, Parts A and B.
Gupta, S., and Hirani, H., 2011, “Optimization of Magnetorheological Brake,” ASME/STLE 2011 International Joint Tribology Conference, Los Angeles, California, October 24–26.
Parlak, Z., Engin, T., Arı, V., Şahin, İ., and Çalli, İ., 2010, “Geometrical Optimisation of Vehicle Shock Dampers With Magnetorheological Fluid,” Int. J. Veh. Des., 54(4), pp. 371–392. [CrossRef]
Lord Corporation, 2003, “MR Fluid Product Bulletins,” from http://www.rheonetic.com/fluidbegin.htm
Roy, R. K., 2003, Design Experiments Using the Taguchi Aproach:16 Steps to Product and Process. Improvement, A Wiley–Interscience Publication, New York, NY.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic for the prototyped MR damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Magnetic circuit of the MR damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mesh of the piston head

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Magnetic flux densities for (a) damper 1, (b) damper 2, (c) damper 3, (d) damper 4, (e) damper 5, (f) damper 6, (g) damper 7, (h) damper 8, and (i) damper 9

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Curve, magnetic flux density versus gap width, (b) curve, magnetic flux density versus flange length, and (c) curve, magnetic flux density versus current

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dampers after assembling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The test machine with the damper under test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Force–displacement curve of the optimal damper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Force–displacement curve of the optimal damper



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In