0
Research Papers

A Closed-Form Nonlinear Model for the Constraint Characteristics of Symmetric Spatial Beams

[+] Author and Article Information
Shorya Awtar

e-mail: awtar@umich.edu
Precision Systems Design Lab,
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
2350 Hayward Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Uniform implies a non-varying cross- section along the beam length. Symmetric implies equal moments of area of the beam cross-section about the Y and Z axes.

Slender generally implies a length to thickness ratio greater than 20 [12,13].

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received March 1, 2012; final manuscript received October 25, 2012; published online January 24, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Ashitava Ghosal.

J. Mech. Des 135(3), 031003 (Jan 24, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1139; doi: 10.1115/1.4023157 History: Received March 01, 2012; Revised October 25, 2012

The constraint-based design of flexure mechanisms requires a qualitative and quantitative understanding of the constraint characteristics of flexure elements that serve as constraints. This paper presents the constraint characterization of a uniform and symmetric cross-section, slender, spatial beam—a basic flexure element commonly used in three-dimensional flexure mechanisms. The constraint characteristics of interest, namely stiffness and error motions, are determined from the nonlinear load–displacement relations at the beam end. Appropriate assumptions are made while formulating the strain and strain energy expressions for the spatial beam to retain relevant geometric nonlinearities. Using the principle of virtual work, nonlinear beam governing equations are derived and subsequently solved for general end loads. The resulting nonlinear load–displacement relations capture the constraint characteristics of the spatial beam in a compact, closed-form, and parametric manner. This constraint model is shown to be accurate using nonlinear finite element analysis, within a load and displacement range of practical interest. The utility of this model lies in the physical and analytical insight that it offers into the constraint behavior of a spatial beam flexure, its use in design and optimization of 3D flexure mechanism geometries, and its elucidation of fundamental performance tradeoffs in flexure mechanism design.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Spatial beam flexure—undeformed and deformed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A 3 DOF patial flexure mechanism

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Spatial kinematics of beam deformation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Elastic matrix [H1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Kinematic matrices [H2], [H3], and [H7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Elastokinematic matrix [H4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig.7

Elastokinematic matrix [H5]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In