Technical Briefs

A Closed-Form Solution for Minimizing the Cycle Time in Motion Programs With Constant Velocity Segments

[+] Author and Article Information
Forrest W. Flocker

e-mail: flocker_f@utpb.edu

Ramiro H. Bravo

e-mail: bravo_r@utpb.edu
Department of Engineering and Technology,
University of Texas of the Permian Basin,
4901 E. University, Odessa, TX 79762

Contributed by the Mechanisms and Robotics Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received March 22, 2012; final manuscript received June 5, 2012; published online November 19, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Ashitava Ghosal.

J. Mech. Des 135(1), 014502 (Nov 19, 2012) (7 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1170; doi: 10.1115/1.4007930 History: Received March 22, 2012; Revised June 05, 2012

An important need for some dynamic systems is to design a periodic motion program that has a constant velocity segment for a specified time. A few examples of such systems are cam-follower systems used in continuous motion manufacturing, linear actuators, space-based scanners, and industrial robots. In this paper, the closed-form solution is given for a motion program that minimizes the cycle time subject to user-specified limits on positive and negative acceleration and jerk. The main benefit of minimizing cycle time is to maximize the throughput. Two motion programs that address the problem are presented and critically examined. For general applicability, the solution is presented in dimensionless form and an example is given to show its implementation to a typical problem. Conclusions regarding the profiles are drawn and given.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Cycles , Acceleration
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

General form of the optimal acceleration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensionless form of the problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Illustration of the problem to be solved

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A typical machine with periodic output motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Follower kinematics for illustrative problem with trapezoidal acceleration: (a) follower position, (b) follower velocity, (c) follower acceleration, and (d) follower jerk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cycle time as a function of jerk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of jerk on kinematics: (a) follower position, (b) follower velocity, and (c) follower acceleration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Splined trapezoidal acceleration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Follower kinematics for illustrative problem with splined trapezoidal acceleration: (a) follower acceleration and (b) follower jerk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Spectral energy for the two acceleration functions used in the illustrative problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Strength ratio of harmonic components—optimal to smoothed profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Spectral energy for trapezoidal acceleration at three jerk levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Strength ratio of harmonic components—large to minimum jerk profiles




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In