0
Research Papers

Form Function Fidelity

[+] Author and Article Information
Ian Tseng

Graduate Student Integrated Design Innovation Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA 15213 e-mail: ian.h.tseng@gmail.com

Jonathan Cagan

George Tallman & Florence Barrett Ladd, Professor, Integrated Design Innovation Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu

Kenneth Kotovsky

Professor e-mail: kotovsky@cmu.edu

Matthew Wood

Graduate Student and DoD SMART Scholar Integrated Design Innovation Group, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Contributed by Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received September 13, 2012; final manuscript received October 8, 2012; published online November 21, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Panos Y. Papalambros.

J. Mech. Des 135(1), 011006 (Nov 21, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1455; doi: 10.1115/1.4007933 History: Received September 13, 2012; Revised October 08, 2012

Engineering goals are typically rooted in addressing the functional needs of a product. While these engineering goals and specifications can be important in consumers' buying decisions, many times the first impression of the product comes from judgments of the product's aesthetic form. For this reason, this paper set out to study how well human judgment of performance based on a car's shape correlates with the actual measured performance of the car's shape, and what features of the car's shape most influence this judgment. More specifically, participants were asked to rate how aerodynamic, sporty, fuel efficient, and rugged a computer generated car design appeared to them, and these ratings were analyzed against the actual aerodynamics of the vehicle as well as key indicators of sportiness and cornering stability such as center of gravity and wheel stance. The inter-rater consistency of human judgments was also studied. Using this human judgment data, the attributes in car design with the greatest effect on participant judgment of vehicle performance were identified, and were compared against their importance and effect in actual vehicle performance. Analysis of this data gives key insights about how car designers can create designs that better convey the desired goals of a car to consumers while also meeting those performance goals. The results of this study provide evidence that consumers are reasonably accurate at determining certain functional performance traits, such as aerodynamics, but are insensitive to other traits, such as the wheelbase of the vehicle design. It was also determined that the stylistic and functional performance judgments of the consumers surveyed may have been influenced by social norms and conventions learned from past experiences with vehicle designs.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Survey program interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Curves in vehicle design model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in aerodynamics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in sportiness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in fuel efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in ruggedness

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In