Research Papers

Form Function Fidelity

[+] Author and Article Information
Ian Tseng

Graduate Student Integrated Design Innovation Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA 15213 e-mail: ian.h.tseng@gmail.com

Jonathan Cagan

George Tallman & Florence Barrett Ladd, Professor, Integrated Design Innovation Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 e-mail: cagan@cmu.edu

Kenneth Kotovsky

Professor e-mail: kotovsky@cmu.edu

Matthew Wood

Graduate Student and DoD SMART Scholar Integrated Design Innovation Group, Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Contributed by Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received September 13, 2012; final manuscript received October 8, 2012; published online November 21, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Panos Y. Papalambros.

J. Mech. Des 135(1), 011006 (Nov 21, 2012) (9 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1455; doi: 10.1115/1.4007933 History: Received September 13, 2012; Revised October 08, 2012

Engineering goals are typically rooted in addressing the functional needs of a product. While these engineering goals and specifications can be important in consumers' buying decisions, many times the first impression of the product comes from judgments of the product's aesthetic form. For this reason, this paper set out to study how well human judgment of performance based on a car's shape correlates with the actual measured performance of the car's shape, and what features of the car's shape most influence this judgment. More specifically, participants were asked to rate how aerodynamic, sporty, fuel efficient, and rugged a computer generated car design appeared to them, and these ratings were analyzed against the actual aerodynamics of the vehicle as well as key indicators of sportiness and cornering stability such as center of gravity and wheel stance. The inter-rater consistency of human judgments was also studied. Using this human judgment data, the attributes in car design with the greatest effect on participant judgment of vehicle performance were identified, and were compared against their importance and effect in actual vehicle performance. Analysis of this data gives key insights about how car designers can create designs that better convey the desired goals of a car to consumers while also meeting those performance goals. The results of this study provide evidence that consumers are reasonably accurate at determining certain functional performance traits, such as aerodynamics, but are insensitive to other traits, such as the wheelbase of the vehicle design. It was also determined that the stylistic and functional performance judgments of the consumers surveyed may have been influenced by social norms and conventions learned from past experiences with vehicle designs.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Parsons, G., and Carlson, A., 2009, Functional Beauty, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Ewen, S., 1990, All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture, Basic Books, NY.
Morgan, G., 1998, Images of Organization: The Executive Edition [Abridged], Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Harrison, L. E., and Huntington, S. P., eds., 2001, Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, Basic Books, NY.
Hazelrigg, G. A., 1998, “A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design,” J. Mech. Des., 120(4), pp. 653–659. [CrossRef]
Li, H., and Azarm, S., 2000, “Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage,” J. Mech. Des., 122(4), pp. 411–418. [CrossRef]
Wassenaar, H. J., Chen, W., Cheng, J., and Sudjianto, A., 2005, “Enhancing Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(4), pp. 514–523. [CrossRef]
Michalek, J. J., Ceryan, O., Papalambros, P. Y., and Koren, Y., 2006, “Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 128(6), pp. 1196–1204. [CrossRef]
Stiny, G., 1980, “Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars,” Environ. Plann. B, 7(3), pp. 343–351. [CrossRef]
Stiny, G., and Mitchell, W. J., 1978, “The Palladian Grammar,” Environ. Plann. B, 5(1), pp. 5–18. [CrossRef]
Cagdas, G., 1996, “A Shape Grammar: The Language of Traditional Turkish Houses,” Environ. Plann. B, 23(4), pp. 443–464. [CrossRef]
Agarwal, M., and Cagan, J., 1998, “A Blend of Different Tastes: The Language of Coffee Makers,” Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des., 25(2), pp. 205–226. [CrossRef]
Pugliese, M., and Cagan, J., 2002, “Capturing a Rebel: Modeling the Harley-Davidson Brand Through a Motorcycle Shape Grammar,” Res. Eng. Des., 13(3), pp. 139–156.
McCormack, J. P., Cagan, J., and Vogel, C. M., 2004, “Speaking the Buick Language: Capturing, Understanding, and Exploring Brand Identity With Shape Grammars,” Des. Stud., 25, pp. 1–29. [CrossRef]
Orsborn, S., Cagan, J., Pawlicki, R., and Smith, R. C., 2006, “Creating Cross-Over Vehicles: Defining and Combining Vehicle Classes Using Shape Grammars,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 20, pp. 217–246. [CrossRef]
Orsborn, S., Cagan, J., and Boatwright, P., 2008, “Quantifying Aesthetic Form Preference in a Utility Function,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Aug. 3–6, Brooklyn, NY.
Swamy, S., Orsborn, S., Michalek, J., and Cagan, J., 2007, “Measurement of Headlight Form Preference Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis,” Proceedings of ASME IDETC/CIE 2007, Sept. 4–7, Las Vegas, NV.
Hsiao, S. W., and Liu, M. C., 2002, “A Morphing Method for Shape Generation and Image Prediction in Product Design,” Des. Stud., 23(5), pp. 533–556. [CrossRef]
Smith, R. C., Pawlicki, R., Kokai, I., Finger, J., and Vetter, T., 2007, “Navigating in a Shape Space of Registered Models,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 13(6), pp. 1552–1559. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nagamachi, M., 2002, “Kansei Engineering as a Powerful Consumer-Oriented Technology for Product Development,” Appl. Ergon., 33, pp. 289–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bouchard, C., Lim, D., and Aoussat, A., 2003, “Development of a Kansei Engineering System for Industrial Design: Identification of Input Data for KES,” 6th Asian Design International Conference, ADC, Tsukuba.
Osgood, C., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P., 1957, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Il.
Likert, R., 1932, “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes,” Arch. Psychol., 140, pp. 1–55.
Chen, X., McKay, A., de Pennington, A., and Chau, H. H., 2004, “Package Shape Design Principles to Support Brand Identity,” 14th IAPRI World Conference on Packaging, 14th IAPRI World Conference on Packaging.
Achiche, S., and Ahmed, S., 2008, “Mapping Shape Geometry and Emotions Using Fuzzy Logic,” Proceedings from ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
Chang, C. C., and Shih, Y. Y., 2003, “A Differential Study on the Product Form Perceptions of Different Age Group Users,” Proceedings of the 6th Asian Design InternationalConference.
Yanagisawa, H., and Murakami, T., 2008, “Factors Affecting Viewpoint Shifts When Evaluating Shape Aesthetics Towards Extracting Customer's Latent Needs of Emotional Quality,” Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
Reid, T., Gonzalez, R., and Papalambros, P., 2009, “A Methodology for Quantifying the Perceived Environmental Friendliness of Vehicle Silhouettes in Engineering Design,” Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
Tseng, I. H., 2011, “The Unification of Stylistic Form and Function,” Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.
Calkins, D. E., and Chan, W. T., 1998, “CDaero—A Parametric Aerodynamic Drag Prediction Tool,” International Congress and Exposition, Feb., Detroit, MI, SAE Technical Paper No. 980398.
Guan, L., 1995, “Feature Based Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient Metamodel,” M.S. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Chan, W. T., 1997, “Empirical Prediction of Automobile Drag Coefficient,” M.S. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Carr, G. W., and Stapleford, W. R., 1981, “A Proposed Empirical Method for Predicting the Aerodynamic Drag of Cars,” Motor Industry Research Association (MIRA), England.
Shrout, P., and Fleiss, J., 1979, “Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability,” Psychol. Bull., 86(2), pp. 420–428. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
McGraw, K. O., and Wong, S. P., 1996, “Forming Inferences About Some Intraclass Correlation Coefficients,” Psychol. Methods, 1(1), pp. 30–46. [CrossRef]
Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., and Mumford, M. D., 2004, “Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Effects of Appraisal and Revision Standards,” Creativity Res. J., 16(2&3), pp. 231–246. [CrossRef]
Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., and Teach, R., 1993, “Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity,” Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 55, pp. 120–151. [CrossRef]
Robinson, M. A., Sparrow, P. R., Clegg, C., and Birdi, K., 2005, “Design Engineering Competencies: Future Requirements and Predicted Changes in the Forthcoming Decade,” Des. Stud., 26(2), pp. 123–153. [CrossRef]
Gelman, A., and Hill, J., 2006, “Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models,” Cambridge University, Cambridge, New York.
Seltzman, H., 2012, “Experimental Design and Analysis,” http://www.stat.cmu.edu/∼hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf
Field, A., 2005, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
Keppel, G., and Wickens, T. D., 2004, Design and Analysis a Researcher's Handbook, 4th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Jolliffe, I. T., 2002, Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed., Springer, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Survey program interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Curves in vehicle design model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in sportiness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in fuel efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in aerodynamics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Vehicle design in line with high ratings in ruggedness



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In