Research Papers

Observations From Radical Innovation Projects Considering the Company Context

[+] Author and Article Information
Bernard Yannou

e-mail: bernard.yannou@ecp.fr

Marija Jankovic

Assistant Professor
e-mail: marija.jankovic@ecp.fr

Yann Leroy

Assistant Professor
e-mail: yann.leroy@ecp.fr
Laboratoire Genie Industriel, Ecole Centrale Paris,
Chatenay-Malabry 92290, France

Gül E. Okudan Kremer

Associate Professor
Harold and Inge Marcus Department of
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,
Penn State University,
361 Leonhard Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: gkremer@psu.edu

Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the Journal of Mechanical Design. Manuscript received February 5, 2012; final manuscript received October 27, 2012; published online January 7, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Jonathan Cagan.

J. Mech. Des 135(2), 021005 (Jan 07, 2013) (17 pages) Paper No: MD-12-1093; doi: 10.1115/1.4023150 History: Received February 05, 2012; Revised October 27, 2012

The development of product-service innovation projects within the context of a company is not yet supported by clear theories and methodologies. Our objective is to analyze innovation and idea generation for such projects from the fuzzy front end to the selected design concept, assessing their potential to be successfully developed and launched on the market. We present a protocol study, using which data derived from 19 innovation projects of five types and conducted by 86 students are analyzed. Sixty-one variables are observed, thus generating 700 data vectors. Bayesian network learning is used to explore conditional inferences among these variables. We examine conditional probabilities between the innovation process means and the significant results produced for the company, modulated by the influence of contextual variables. A number of surprising findings are drawn about the link between problem setting and problem solving processes, the importance of certain contextual variables, and the potential discrepancies between the apparent and produced results of innovative projects. Conducted analyses imply the need for novel innovation evaluation frameworks.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., and Vargas-Hernandez, N., 2000, “Evaluation of Idea Generation Methods for Conceptual Design: Effectiveness Metrics and Design of Experiments,” J. Mech. Des., 122(4), pp. 377–385. [CrossRef]
Motte, D., Bjärnemo, R., and Yannou, B., 2011, “On the Interaction Between the Engineering Design and Development Process Models—Part I: Elaborate Elaborations on the Generally Accepted Process Models,” Proceedings of the ICoRD: 3rd International Conference on Research Into Design, Jan. 10–12, Bangalore, India.
Motte, D., Bjärnemo, R., and Yannou, B., 2011, “On the Interaction Between the Engineering Design and the Development Process Models—Part II: Shortcomings and Limitations,” Proceedings of the ICoRD: 3rd International Conference on Research into Design, Jan. 10–12, Bangalore, India.
Motte, D., Yannou, B., and Bjärnemo, R., 2011, “The Specificities of Radical Innovation,” Proceedings of the ICoRD: 3rd International Conference on Research into Design, Jan. 10–12, Bangalore, India.
Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, Technology & Industrial Arts, London and New York.
Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D., 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cross, N., 1994, Engineering Design Methods—Strategies for Product Design, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Liu, Y. C., Chakrabarti, A., and Bligh, T., 2003, “Towards and “Ideal” Approach for Concept Generation,” Des. Stud., 24(4), pp. 341–355. [CrossRef]
Pugh, S., 1990, Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineers, Addison Wesley, New-York.
Lawson, B., 2006, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Architectural Press, Oxford.
Portillo, M., 2009, Color Planning for Interiors: An Integrated Approach to Color in Designed Spaces, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Portillo, M., and Dohr, J. H., 1994, “Bridging Process and Structure Through Criteria,” Des. Stud., 15(4), pp. 403–416. [CrossRef]
Gann, D., Salter, A., and Whyte, J., 2003, “Design Quality Indicators as a Tool for Thinking,” Build. Res. Inf., 31(5), pp. 318–333. [CrossRef]
Jones, E., Stanton, N. A., and Harrison, D., 2001, “Applying Structured Methods to Ecoinnovation. An evaluation of the Product Ideas Tree diagram,” Des. Stud., 22(6), pp. 519–542. [CrossRef]
Pinch, S., Sunley, P., and Macmillen, J., 2010, “Cognitive Mapping of Creative Practice: A Case Study of Three English Design Agencies,” Geoforum, 41, pp. 377–387. [CrossRef]
Shah, J., and Vargas-Hernandez, N., 2003, “Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness,” Des. Stud., 24(2), pp. 111–134. [CrossRef]
Astebro, T., 2004, “Key Success Factors for Technological Enterpreneurs' R&D Projects,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 51(3), pp. 314–321. [CrossRef]
Millier, P., 1999, Marketing The Unknown: Developing Market Strategies for Technical Innovations, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Dong, A., Hill, A. W., and Agogino, A., 2004, “A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Design Team Performance,” J. Mech. Des., 126, pp. 378–385. [CrossRef]
Yang, M., 2004, “An Examination of Prototyping and Design Outcome,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City.
Yang, M., 2009, “Observations on Concept Generation and Sketching in Engineering Design,” Res. Eng. Des., 20(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Yang, M. C., 2003, “Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations With Design Outcome,” Proceedings of DETC-DTM: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences—Design Theories and Methodologies, Sept. 2–6, Chicago, Illinois.
Gero, J. S., and Kazakov, V., 1995, “An Exploration Based Evolutionary Model of a Generative Design Process,” Microcomput. Civ. Eng., 11, pp. 209–216. [CrossRef]
Roozenburg, N. F., and Eekels, J., 1995, Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Fricke, G., 1996, “Successful Individual Approaches in Engineering Design,” Res. Eng. Des., 8, pp. 151–156. [CrossRef]
Sarkar, P., and Chakrabarti, A., 2007, “Understanding Search in Design,” Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED07), August, Paris, France.
Römer, A., Leinert, S., and Sachse, P., 2000, “External Support of Problem Analysis in Design Problem Solving,” Res. Eng. Des., 12(3), pp. 144–151. [CrossRef]
Tovey, M., Porter, S., and Newman, R., 2003, “Sketching, Concept Development and Automotive Design,” Des. Stud., 24(2), pp. 135–153. [CrossRef]
Yang, M., and Cham, J., 2007, “An Analysis of Sketching Skill and Its Role in Early Stage Engineering Design,” J. Mech. Des., 129(5), pp. 476–482. [CrossRef]
Mabogunje, A., and Leifer, L., 1996, “Measuring the Mechanical Engineering Design Process,” Proceedings of the 26th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference on Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education, Salt Lake City.
Yang, M. C., Wood, W. H., and Cutkosky, R., 2005, “Design Information Retrieval: A Thesauri-Based Approach for Reuse of Informal Design Information,” Eng. Comput., 21, pp. 177–192. [CrossRef]
Kulkarni, S., 1998, “Idea Generation Techniques-A Critical Survey,” Technical Report, ASU/DAL/IG/98-2, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
VanGundy, A. B., 1988, Techniques of Structured Problem Solving, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Chakrabarti, A., 2009, “Design Creativity Research,” Product Research: The Art and Science Behinf Sucessful Product Launches, Springer Science+Business Media B. V., Vol., pp. 17–39.
Davis, G. A., 1999, Creativity is Forever, 4th ed., Kendall Hunt, Dubuque Iowa.
Fox, J. M., and Fox, R. L., 2000, Exploring the Nature of Creativity, Kendal Hunt, Dubuque Iowa.
Gluck, F. W., 1985, ““Big Bang” Management,” J. Bus. Strategy, 6(1), pp. 59–64. [CrossRef]
McKim, R. H., 1980, Thinking Visually: A Strategy Manual for Problem Solving, Lifetime Learning Publications Belmont, CA.
Sarkar, P., and Chakrabarti, A., 2011, “Assessing Design Creativity,” Des. Stud., 32(4), pp. 348–383. [CrossRef]
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., and Nataraju, B. S., 2005, “A Functional Representation for Aiding Biomimetic and Artificial Inspiration of New Ideas,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 19(2), pp. 113–132. [CrossRef]
Srinivasan, V., and Chakrabarti, A., 2008, “Design for Novelty—A Framework?,” Proceedings of the Design Conference, May 19–22, Dubrovnik, pp. 237–244.
Goldschmidt, G., and Tatsa, D., 2005, “How Good are Good Ideas? Correlates of Design Creativity,” Des. Stud., 26(6), pp. 593–611. [CrossRef]
Goldschmidt, G., 1990, “Linkography: Assessing Design Productivity,” Proceedings of the Tenth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Singapore, R Trappl.
Goldschmidt, G., 2003, “Cognitive Economy in Design Reasoning,” Human Behaviour in Design: Individuals, Teams, Tools, U.Lindeman, ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 53–62.
van derLugtR., 2001, “Sketching in Design Idea Generation Meetings,” Ph. D Dissertation, Faculty of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Rianantsoa, N., Yannou, B., and Redon, R., 2010, “Concept-to-Value: Method and Tool for Value Creation in Conceptual Design,” Proceedings of IDETC/DAC: ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences/Design Automation Conference, Aug. 15–18, Montreal, Canada.
Rianantsoa, N., Yannou, B., and Redon, R., 2010, “Dynamics of Definition and Evaluation of Value Creation Strategies and Design Concepts,” Proceedings of IDMME Virtual Concept, Oct. 20–22, Bordeaux, France.
Barton, D. N., Saloranta, T., Moe, S. J., Eggestad, H. O., and Kuikka, S., 2008, “Bayesian Belief Networks as a Meta-Modelling Tool in Integrated River Basin Management—Pros and Cons in Evaluating Nutrient Abatement Decisions Under Uncertainty in a Norwegian River Basin,” Ecol. Econ., 66(1), pp. 91–104. [CrossRef]
Jensen, F. V., and Nielsen, T. D., 2007, Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.
Chan, Z. S. H., Ngan, H. W., Rad, A. B., David, A. K., and Kasabov, N., 2006, “Short-Term ANN Load Forecasting From Limited Data Using Generalization Learning Strategies,” Neurocomputing, 70(1–3), pp. 409–419. [CrossRef]
Saini, L. M., 2008, “Peak Load Forecasting Using Bayesian Regularization, Resilient and Adaptive Backpropagation Learning Based Artificial Neural Networks,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., 78(7), pp. 1302–1310. [CrossRef]
Grünwald, P. D., 2007, The Minimum Description Length Principle, The MIT Press, New York.
Jensen, F. V., 1996, An Introduction to Bayesian Networks, UCL Press, London.
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R., 2000, Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., and Chickering, D. M., 1995, “Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data,” Mach. Learn., 20(3), pp. 197–243. [CrossRef]
Jouffe, L., 2002, “Nouvelle classe de Méthodes D'apprentissage de Réseaux Bayésiens,” Proc. Journées francophones d'Extraction et de Gestion des Connaissances (EGC), Montpellier, France.
Jouffe, L., and Munteanu, P., 2000, “Smart-Greedy+: Apprentissage Hybride de Réseaux Bayésiens,” Colloque francophone sur l'apprentissage (CAP), Saint Etienne, France.
Munteanu, P., and Bendou, M., 2001, “The EQ Framework for Learning Equivalence Classes of Bayesian Networks,” Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (IEEE ICDM), San José, pp. 417–424.
Heckerman, D., Meek, C., and Cooper, G., 1999, “A Bayesian Approach to Causal Discovery,” Computation, Causation, and Discovery, C.Glymour and G.Cooper, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 141–165.
Ben Ahmed, W., and Yannou, B., 2009, “A Bayesian Learning of Probabilistic Relations Between Perceptual Attributes and Technical Characteristics of Car Dashboards to Construct a Perceptual Evaluation Model,” International Journal of Product Development, Special Issue on Engineering Emotional Design (EED) and Kansei Engineering (KE), 7(1–2), pp. 47–72.
Cai, Z., Sun, S., Si, S., and Yannou, B., 2011, “Identifying Product Failure Rate Based on a Conditional Bayesian Network Classifier,” Expert Sys. Applic., 38(5), pp. 5036–5043. [CrossRef]
Bouckaert, R. R., 1993, “Probabilistic Network Construction Using the Minimum Description Length Principle,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 747, pp. 41–51. [CrossRef]
Lam, W., and Bacchus, F., 1994, “Learning Bayesian Belief Networks: An Approach Based on the MDL Principle,” Comput. Intell., 10, pp. 269–293. [CrossRef]
BayesiaLab, 2006, “Bayesia Tutorial Book,” www.bayesialab.com.
Aurisicchio, M., Gourtovaia, M., Bracewell, R., and Wallace, K., 2008, “How to Evaluate Reading and Interpretation of Differently Structured Engineering Design Rationales,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 22, pp. 345–358. [CrossRef]
Bracewell, R., Wallace, K., Moss, M., and Knott, D., 2009, “Capturing Design Rationale,” Computer-Aided Des., 41, pp. 173–186. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The conceptual design process defined by Cross [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Pugh's conceptual design process [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Liu et al. proposition of an “ideal” design process and design support tool [8]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Influencing factors on creativity [34]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Our observation protocol of innovative projects

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The RID innovation wheel: From initial idea to feasibility and innovation dossier through ideal need, perimeter of ambition, brief(s), concepts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The value machine of an innovative project using RID methodology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Tripod concept for weighting machine for African children

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Percentage of product versus service embedded in the initial design statement of the 5 projects: variable P/S

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Evaluation consensus reached considering the knowledge required for the realization of the project according to type of project

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

UML model representing the data collection and RID experimental protocol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Supervised network on D20 (refer to tables 1 to 4 for the meaning of variables). (Green—design team features, red—results, blue—project context, yellow—deliverables, orange—quality.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Semisupervised network on overall quality of problem solving D21

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Semisupervised network concerning the Organization of creativity: brainstorming workshops based upon identified innovation leads D9

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

A major finding of study: the overall quality of problem setting process dramatically influences the overall quality of problem solving process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Supervised learning on R15 “The chosen design concept is innovative, mature, and sufficiently validated”




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In