0
Technical Briefs

The Discrete Topology Optimization of Structures Using the Improved Hybrid Discretization Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Hong Zhou

e-mail: hong.zhou@tamuk.edu

Rutesh B. Patil

e-mail: rutesh.patil@gmail.com
Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering, Texas A&M University-Kingsville,
Kingsville, TX 78363

Contributed by the Design Education Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received February 29, 2012; final manuscript received September 12, 2012; published online October 26, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Shinji Nishiwaki.

J. Mech. Des 134(12), 124503 (Nov 15, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007841 History: Received February 29, 2012; Revised September 12, 2012

In the discrete topology optimization, material state is either solid or void and there is no topology uncertainty caused by any intermediate material state. In this paper, the improved hybrid discretization model is introduced for the discrete topology optimization of structures. The design domain is discretized into quadrilateral design cells and each quadrilateral design cell is further subdivided into triangular analysis cells. The dangling and redundant solid design cells are completely eliminated from topology solutions in the improved hybrid discretization model to avoid sharp protrusions. The local stress constraint is directly imposed on each triangular analysis cell to make the designed structure safe. The binary bit-array genetic algorithm is used to search for the optimal topology to circumvent the geometrical bias against the vertical design cells. The presented discrete topology optimization procedure is illustrated by two topology optimization examples of structures.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bendsoe, M. P., Kikuchi, N., 1988, “Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 71, pp. 197–224. [CrossRef]
Bendsoe, M. P., 1995, “Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, and Material,” Springer, New York.
Hinton, E., and Hassani, B., 1999, Homogenization and Structural Topology Optimization: Theory, Practice and Software, Springer, New York.
Eschenauer, H. A., and Olhoff, N., 2001, “Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures: A Review,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 54, pp. 331–389. [CrossRef]
Rozvany, G. I. N., 2009, “A Critical Review of Established Methods of Structural Topology Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 37, pp. 217–237. [CrossRef]
Diaz, A. R., and Sigmund, O., 1995, “Checkerboard Patterns in Layout Optimization,” Struct. Optim., 10, pp. 40–45. [CrossRef]
Jog, C. S., and Haber, R. B., 1996, “Stability of Finite Element Models for Distributed Parameter Optimization and Topology Design,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 130, pp. 203–226. [CrossRef]
Poulsen, T. A., 2002, “A Simple Scheme to Prevent Checkerboard Patterns and One-Node Connected Hinges in Topology Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 24, pp. 396–399. [CrossRef]
Poulsen, T. A., 2003, “A New Scheme for Imposing a Minimum Length Scale in Topology Optimization,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 57, pp. 741–760. [CrossRef]
Pomezanski, V., Querin, O. M., and Rozvany, G. I. N., 2005, “CO-SIMP: Extended SIMP Algorithm With Direct Corner Contact Control,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 30, pp. 164–168. [CrossRef]
Haber, R. B., Jog, S. C., and Bendsoe, M. P., 1996, “A New Approach to Variable-Topology Shape Design Using a Constraint on Perimeter,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 11, pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Petersson, J., 1999, “Some Convergence Results in Perimeter-Controlled Topology Optimization,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 171, pp. 123–140. [CrossRef]
Petersson, J., and Sigmund, O., 1998, “Slope Constrained Topology Optimization,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 41, pp. 1417–1434. [CrossRef]
Zhou, M., Shyy, Y. K., and Thomas, H. L., 2001, “Checkerboard and Minimum Member Size Control in Topology Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 21, pp. 152–158. [CrossRef]
Jang, G. W., Jeong, J. H., Kim, Y. Y., Sheen, D., Park, C., and Kim, M. N., 2003, “Checkerboard-Free Topology Optimization Using Non-Conforming Finite Elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 57, pp. 1717–1735. [CrossRef]
Jang, G. W., Lee, S., Kim, Y. Y., and Sheen, D., 2005, “Topology Optimization Using Non-Conforming Finite Elements: Three-Dimensional Case,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 63, pp. 859–875. [CrossRef]
Belytschko, T., Xiao, S. P., and Parimi, C., 2003, “Topology Optimization With Implicit Functions and Regulation,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 57, pp. 1177–1196. [CrossRef]
Rahmatalla, S. F., and Swan, C. C., 2004, “A Q4/Q4 Continuum Structural Topology Optimization Implementation,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 27, pp. 130–135. [CrossRef]
Matsui, K., and Terada, K., 2004, “Continuous Approximation of Material Distribution for Topology Optimization,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 59, pp. 1925–1944. [CrossRef]
Guest, J. K., Prevost, J. H., and Belytschko, T., 2004, “Achieving Minimum Length Scale in Topology Optimization Using Nodal Design Variables and Projection Functions,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 61, pp. 238–254. [CrossRef]
Saxena, A., 2008, “A Material-Mask Overlay Strategy for Continuum Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms Using Honeycomb Discretization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 130, p. 082304. [CrossRef]
Jain, C., and Saxena, A., 2010, “An Improved Material-Mask Overlay Strategy for Topology Optimization of Structures and Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132, p. 061006. [CrossRef]
Saxena, A., 2011, “An Adaptive Material Mask Overlay Method: Modifications and Investigations on Binary, Well Connected Robust Compliant Continua,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133, p. 041004. [CrossRef]
Saxena, A., 2011, “Are Circular Shaped Masks Adequate in Adaptive Mask Overlay Topology Synthesis Method,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133, p. 011001. [CrossRef]
Zhou, H., 2010, “Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms Using Hybrid Discretization Model,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132, p. 111003. [CrossRef]
Zhou, H., and Killekar, P. P., 2011, “The Modified Quadrilateral Discretization Model for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 133, p. 111007. [CrossRef]
Black, J., 2008, Lean Production, Industrial Press, New York.
Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Kim, I. Y., and Weck, O. L., 2005, “Variable Chromosome Length Genetic Algorithm for Progressive Refinement in Topology Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 29, pp. 445–456. [CrossRef]
Kim, D. S., Jung, D. H., and Kim, Y. Y., 2008, “Multiscale Multiresolution Genetic Algorithm With a Golden Sectioned Population Composition,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 74, pp. 349–367. [CrossRef]
Chapman, C. D., Saitou, K., and Jakiela, M. J., 1994, “Genetic Algorithms as an Approach to Configuration and Topology Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116, pp. 1005–1012. [CrossRef]
Chapman, C. D., and Jakiela, M. J., 1996, “Genetic Algorithm-Based Structural Topology Design With Compliance and Topology Simplification Considerations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, pp. 89–98. [CrossRef]
Kane, C., and Schoenauer, M., 1996, “Topological Optimum Design Using Genetic Algorithms,” Control Cybern., 25, pp. 1059–1088.
Duda, J. W., and Jakiela, M. J., 1997, “Generation and Classification of Structural Topologies Genetic Algorithm Speciation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119, pp. 127–131. [CrossRef]
Wang, S. Y., and Tai, K., 2005, “Structural Topology Design Optimization Using Algorithms With a Bit-Array Representation,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194, pp. 3749–3770. [CrossRef]
Tai, K., and Prasad, J., 2007, “Target-Matching Test Problem for Multiobjective Topology Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm for Progressive Refinement in Topology Optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 34, pp. 333–345. [CrossRef]
Wang, N. F., and Tai, K., 2008, “Design of Grip-and-Move Manipulators Using Symmetric Path Generating Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 130, p. 112306. [CrossRef]
Wang, N. F., and Tai, K., 2010, “Design of 2-DOF Compliant Mechanisms to Form Grip-and-Move Manipulators for 2D Workspace,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132, p. 031007. [CrossRef]
Deo, N., 1990, Graph Theory With Applications to Engineering and Computer Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Haupt, R. L., and Haupt, S. E., 2004, Practical Genetic Algorithms, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
Haslinger, J., and Makinen, R. A. E., 2003, Introduction to Shape Optimization: Theory, Approximation and Computation, Siam, Philadelphia, PA.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A subdivided quadrilateral design cell and its inner and corner triangular analysis cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The four corner triangles between two neighboring quadrilateral design cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two solid neighboring quadrilateral design cells in different directions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The quadrilateral design cells and the subdivided triangular analysis cells in a hybrid discretization model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The quadrilateral design cells and the triangular analysis cells of a topology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The topology of Fig. 5 after dangling design cells are removed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The topology of Fig. 6 after redundant design cells are removed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The topology of Fig. 5 after all dangling and redundant design cells are removed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The eight neighboring design cells around a design cell

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The design domain in example 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The discretization in example 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The subdivision in example 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The topology optimization results of example 1 from the improved hybrid discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The stiffness of example 1 from the improved hybrid discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The constraints of example 1 from the improved hybrid discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

The topology optimization results of example 1 from the quadrilateral discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

The stiffness of example 1 from the quadrilateral discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

The constraints of example 1 from the quadrilateral discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

The design domain in example 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

The discretization in example 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

The subdivision in example 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

The topology optimization results of example 2 from the improved hybrid discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

The stiffness of example 2 from the improved hybrid discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

The constraints of example 2 from the improved hybrid discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

The topology optimization results of example 2 from the quadrilateral discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

The stiffness of example 2 from the quadrilateral discretization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

The constraints of example 2 from the quadrilateral discretization

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In