Technical Briefs

Using the Pareto Set Pursuing Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Hybridization of a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle

[+] Author and Article Information
Shashi K. Shahi

Product Design and Optimization Laboratory,  Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canadashashi_k_shahi@yahoo.ca

G. Gary Wang1

Product Design and Optimization Laboratory,  Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canadagary_wang@sfu.ca

Liqiang An

Mechanical Engineering Department,  North China Electric Power University, Baoding, Chinaanliqiang@gmail.com

Eric Bibeau

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,  University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canadabibeauel@cc.umanitoba.ca

Zhila Pirmoradi

Product Design and Optimization Laboratory,  Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canadazpirmora@sfu.ca


Corresponding author.

J. Mech. Des 134(9), 094503 (Aug 07, 2012) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007149 History: Received November 14, 2011; Revised May 24, 2012; Published August 07, 2012; Online August 07, 2012

A plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) can improve fuel economy and emission reduction significantly compared to hybrid electric vehicles and conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Currently there lacks an efficient and effective approach to identify the optimal combination of the battery pack size, electric motor, and engine for PHEVs in the presence of multiple design objectives such as fuel economy, operating cost, and emission. This work proposes a design approach for optimal PHEV hybridization. Through integrating the Pareto set pursuing (PSP) multiobjective optimization algorithm and powertrain system analysis toolkit (PSAT) simulator on a Toyota Prius PHEV platform, 4480 possible combinations of design parameters (20 batteries, 14 motors, and 16 engines) were explored for PHEV20 and PHEV40 powertrain configurations. The proposed approach yielded the optimal solution in a small fraction of computational time, as compared to an exhaustive search. This confirms the efficiency and applicability of PSP to problems with discrete variables. In the design context we have found that battery, motor, and engine collectively define the optimal hybridization scheme, which also varies with the drive cycle and all electric range (AER). The proposed method and software platform could be applied to optimize other powertrain designs.

Copyright © 2012 by by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Flow chart of the Pareto set pursuing approach

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Flow chart of the program structure for the automated optimization process

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Fuel efficiency, operation cost, and GHG emissions for PHEV20 using UDDS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

PSP multiobjective optimization algorithm with PSAT as a black box

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Optimal battery sizing




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In