Technical Briefs

Decision Methods for Design: Insights from Psychology

[+] Author and Article Information
Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Systems Division, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 3-449D, Cambridge MA 02139-4307; Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germanykatsikop@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

J. Mech. Des 134(8), 084504 (Jul 23, 2012) (4 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007001 History: Received February 27, 2012; Revised April 27, 2012; Published July 23, 2012; Online July 23, 2012

This work aims at stimulating constructive conversation about decision methods in engineering design by using insights from psychology. I point out that any decision method has two components: coherence, which refers to internal consistency (do design choices satisfy a logical axiom?) and correspondence, which refers to external effectiveness (does a design concept satisfy a functional requirement?). Some researchers argue for “rational” methods such as multi-attribute utility theory, whereas others argue for “heuristics” such as the Pugh process, and the coherence/correspondence distinction can clarify this debate in two ways. First, by analyzing statements in the design literature, I argue that the debate is essentially about different strategies for achieving correspondence: Multi-attribute utility theory aims at achieving coherence with the expectation that coherence will imply correspondence, whereas the Pugh process aims at directly achieving correspondence. Second, I propose a new research question for design: “Under what conditions does achieving coherence imply achieving correspondence?”

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Topics: Design
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In