Research Papers

Parameter Screening in Statistical Dynamic Computer Model Calibration Using Global Sensitivities

[+] Author and Article Information
Dorin Drignei

Department of Mathematics and Statistics,  Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309drignei@oakland.edu

Zissimos P. Mourelatos1

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309mourelat@oakland.edu


Corresponding author.

J. Mech. Des 134(8), 081001 (Jul 02, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006874 History: Received July 01, 2011; Revised May 05, 2012; Published June 29, 2012; Online July 02, 2012

Computer, or simulation, models are ubiquitous in science and engineering. Two research topics in building computer models, generally treated separately, are sensitivity analysis and computer model calibration. In sensitivity analysis, one quantifies the effect of each input factor on outputs, whereas in calibration, one finds the values of input factors that provide the best match to a set of test data. In this article, we show a connection between these two seemingly separate concepts for problems with transient signals. We use global sensitivity analysis for computer models with transient signals to screen out inactive input factors, thus making the calibration algorithm numerically more stable. We show that the computer model does not vary with respect to parameters having zero total sensitivity indices, indicating that such parameters are impossible to calibrate and must be screened out. Because the computer model can be computationally intensive, we construct a fast statistical surrogate of the computer model which is used for both sensitivity analysis and computer model calibration. We illustrate our approach with both a simple example and an automotive application involving a road load data acquisition (RLDA) computer model.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Computer model data (dotted) and test data (solid)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Cross-validation results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The 95% confidence bands (dashed) and test data (solid)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In